Mediastinal Lymph Node Dissection in Conjunction With Pulmonary Metastasectomy From Colorectal Cancer

April 10, 2017 updated by: Kåre Hornbech, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Total Mediastinal Lymph Node Dissection in Pulmonary Metastasectomy From Colorectal Cancer - a Randomized, Controlled Trial

To study whether or not total mediastinal lymph node dissection in conjunction with pulmonary metastasectomy from colorectal cancer is associated with improved survival compared to pulmonary metastasectomy only.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The question of lymph node sampling and/or involvement in pulmonary metastasectomy remains controversial. The performance of lymph node dissection during pulmonary metastasectomy is infrequent and varies between institutions. Of all the patients in The International Registry of Lung Metastases only 4,6% of patients underwent lymph node dissection. In a recent survey by Internullo and colleagues amongst the members of European Society of Thoracic Surgeons 55% perform mediastinal lymph node sampling whereas 33% perform no nodal sampling at all. The rate of lymph node involvement varies between primary tumours.

Several studies from groups that systematically perform mediastinal lymph node dissection in conjunction with pulmonary metastasectomy have been published and in all studies the presence of lymph node metastasis emerges as an ominous prognostic factor. Ercan and colleagues found a 3-year survival of 69% for patients without lymph node involvement versus 38% in patients with positive lymph nodes. Saito and colleagues reported a 5-year survival of 53,6 for patients without hilar or mediastinal node involvement versus 6,2% at 4 years for patients with positive nodes. Bölükbas and colleagues reported a 5-year survival of 59% for patients without lymph node involvement in contrast to 23% for patients with lymph node involvement.

The rate of lymph node involvement is reported between 20-43% and risk factors for lymph node involvement include 2 or more metastases, prior liver metastases, rectum cancer and size of metastases .

Most of the above mentioned authors are in favor of mediastinal lymphadenectomy but also stress that the evidence available is not solid enough to make firm recommendations. In conclusion the literature is quite limited and of low-level evidence.

In remains unclear whether the complete removal of mediastinal lymph nodes is associated with a survival benefit or merely allows for a more accurate postoperative staging and guidance for additional oncological treatment. Thus, the aim of the following proposed study is to examine whether or not systemic lymph node dissection during pulmonary metastasectomy is associated with a survival benefit.

Hypothesis:

  1. Systemic mediastinal lymphadenectomy during pulmonary metastasectomy with curative intent for colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is feasible and safe.
  2. Systemic mediastinal lymphadenectomy during pulmonary metastasectomy with curative intent for CRC is associated with improved survival compared to only pulmonary metastasectomy.

Design:

Prospective, randomized, controlled trial. No lymph node dissection versus systemic mediastinal lymph node dissection with en-bloc resection of lymph nodes and fatty tissue in station 2,4,7,8, 9 and 10 on the right side and 5,6,7,8, 9 and 10 on the left side during pulmonary metastasectomy for CRC.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
200

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years
  • Able to give informed consent
  • Willing to be randomized

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous mediastinal lymphadenectomy
  • Previous pulmonary metastasectomy
  • Evidence of other metastasetic disease
  • Primary tumor is not under control
  • Five metastases or more
  • If final histologic examination of the resected lung lesion(s) reveals other histology than colorectal metastasis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Lymph node dissection and pulmonary metastasectomy
Total mediastinal lymph node dissection and pulmonary metastasectomy from colorectal cancer
Procedure: Total mediastinal lymph node dissection and pulmonary metastasectomy
Total mediastinal lymph node dissection where all lymph nodes and fatty tissues is removed conjunction with pulmonary metastasectomy
Active Comparator: Pulmonary metastasectomy only
Only pulmonary metastasectomy from colorectal cancer
Procedure: Only pulmonary metastasectomy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
5-year overall survival
Time Frame: 7-8 years
7-8 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
1-year overall survival
Time Frame: 3-4 years
3-4 years
3-year overall survival
Time Frame: 4-5 years
4-5 years
1-, 3-, 5-year disease free survival
Time Frame: 7-8 years
7-8 years
Number of lymph nodes removed
Time Frame: 2-3 years
2-3 years
30- day morbidity
Time Frame: 2-3 years
2-3 years
30-day mortality
Time Frame: 2-3 years
2-3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 10, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 10, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 13, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 13, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 10, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Khornbech

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Total mediastinal lymph node dissection and pulmonary metastasectomy

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings