Allogeneic ADSCs and Platelet-Poor Plasma Fibrin Hydrogel to Treat the Patients With Burn Wounds (ADSCs-BWs) (ADSCs-BWs)

April 25, 2017 updated by: A.A. Partners, LLC

Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of Tissue Engineered Construct Based on Allogeneic Adipose-derived Multipotent Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and Platelet-poor Plasma Fibrin Hydrogel to Treat the Patients With Burn Wounds

The purpose of this study is to evaluate safety and efficacy of tissue engineered construct based on allogeneic cultured adipose-derived multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (ALLO-ADSCs) and platelet-poor plasma fibrin hydrogel to treat patients with 2-B and 3- degree burn wounds

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

For more than 20 years in clinical practice allogeneic transplantation of diploid fibroblasts (ADP) for burn wounds has been successfully used, it is used as an independent method, and a method of preparing wounds for autologous skin grafting [1].

The clinical efficacy of transplantation ADP, after the research done by E.V. Glushchenko; Rahayev AM [2,3] is not doubted.

Several studies have shown the efficacy of stem cells in promoting faster and superior wound healing. Alexaki [4] successfully used adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells in wound healing in mice and compared their effect with dermal fibroblasts. The application of stem cells in wounds promoted more efficient reepithelialization by their proliferative effect on keratinocytes.

In recent years, the world's leading burn centers attempted to restore the skin over large areas of burn wounds by epidermal layers transplantation of allogeneic cells cultured in culture medium.

The information expected in the study will be based on the principles of evidence-based medicine and will have practical significance for the treatment of burn wounds.

It is expected to show a positive effect of cultured multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells in the epithelization of burn wounds process as well as the extent and speed healing of skin flap during autologous skin grafting.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
20

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Volodymyr S. Melnyk, MD, DSc
  • Phone Number: +380679337461
  • Email: V.Melnyk@ilaya.ua

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Ukraine
      • Kyiv, Ukraine, 02094,13, Krakivska, str.,
        • Recruiting
        • The Kyiv City Clinical Hospital №2
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Dmytro O. Zubov, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Roman G. Vasyliev

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female aged 18-65 years;
  • Patients with 2-nd B and 3-d degree burn wound;
  • Body surface area involved in burns - from 10 to 50%;
  • The area of skin grafting - less than 6% of the skin surface;
  • Burn occurring within the 24 hours prior to the hospitalization;
  • Adequate antishock therapy in the prehospital phase;
  • Women of childbearing age to provide proof of a current, valid negative pregnancy test;
  • Confirmation of participation in the study by signing the Instrument of Consent, personally or through a responsible caretaker.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prognostically favorable or unfavorable outcome of the disease
  • (Lesion Severity Index, less than 30 or more, than 120 score);
  • Combined trauma;
  • Severe respiratory tract burn injuries;
  • Ischemic disease of the lower extremities;
  • The presence of cardiovascular disease (CVD): symptoms of unstable angina, myocarditis, heart disease, heart failure;
  • History of prior cancer;
  • Healing of duodenal or gastric ulcers in history;
  • Diabetes
  • Severe chronic liver diseases or kidney disease in history;
  • History of alcohol or other drug abuse;
  • Pregnanсy;
  • Any other physical diseases in decompensation or subcompensation,
  • or those that are rated as severe or moderate;
  • Therapeutic issues or psychiatric disorders of a patient which would
  • make the subject unsuitable to participate in this study or to complete it;
  • Participation in another clinical trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: ALLO-ASCs
The patients receive ALLO-ADSCs. Biological is applied by surface application over perforated (1:3) autologous skin graft following the covering with hypoadhesive bandage. This procedure is carried out twice - once simultaneously with a skin grafting procedure and 2-3 days following autodermoplasty, while bandaging
Biological: ALLO-ASCs
1). Cryopreserved cell suspension of early passages of cultured allogeneic MSCs isolated from SVF obtained from lipoaspirate, a total of 10 mln. of cultured cells; 2).The TE-construct consisting of collagen- or fibrin-derived hydrogels and cells of early passages (up to P5) suspension of allogeneic cultured MSCs isolated from SVF obtained from lipoaspirate; Biological is applied by surface application over perforated (1:3) autologous skin graft following the covering with hypoadhesive bandage. This procedure is carried out twice - once simultaneously with a skin grafting procedure and 2-3 days following autodermoplasty, while bandaging.
Other Names:
  • Allogeneic adipose-derived stem cells
No Intervention: The standard treatment

All patients will be subjected to standard stepped treatment of burn wounds:

  • Infusion therapy aimed to eliminate disorders of homeostasis during burn shock and burn toxemia;
  • Systemic antibiotic therapy for preventing infectious complications;
  • Adequate analgesia and sedation;
  • Decompression necrotomy in the first 24 hours following the burn trauma;
  • Necrectomy simultaneously with imposition of lyophilized xenografts performed in the first 1-5 days after applying burn;
  • Autologous skin grafting 3-5 days after performed xenografts with the perforation coefficient 1:3

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The degree of healing of skin flap; The degree of epithelialization of burn wounds in the perforations of a skin graft
Time Frame: up to 1 month
The degree of healing of skin flap after autologous skin grafting;
up to 1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The dynamics of healing of skin flap
Time Frame: up to 1 month
Complete epithelization or epithelization more than 50% of the cells in the skin graft on the 10th day after autologous skin grafting are effective. The epithelialization less than 50% is not effective.
up to 1 month
Dynamics of the phagocytic activity of neutrophils in the area of burn wounds, according to NBT-test.
Time Frame: up to 1 month
Dynamics of the phagocytic activity of neutrophils in the area of burn wounds, according to NBT-test.
up to 1 month
Duration of treatment (days) to complete epithelialization of burn wounds;
Time Frame: up to 1 month
Duration of treatment (days) to complete epithelialization of burn wounds;
up to 1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
A.A. Partners, LLC

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Anatoliy V. Voronin, The head doctor of The Kyiv City Clinical Hospital №2
  • Principal Investigator: Georgiy P. Kozynets, MD, PhD, DSc, Head of the department of combustiology and plastic surgery, Shupyk National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 25, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 26, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 26, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 31, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 10, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 14, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 26, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 25, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MSC-P1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Second- or Third-degree Burns

Clinical Trials on ALLO-ASCs

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings