Image Fusion of SPECT MPI and Fluoroscopy Venography to Guide LV Lead Placement for Improved CRT Response (GUIDE-CRT II) (GUIDE-CRT)

August 13, 2025 updated by: The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University
CRT response will be significantly better using image fusion of SPECT MPI and fluoroscopy venogram to guide LV lead placement at the latest activation segment without scar than standard-of-care implantation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Chronic heart failure (CHF) is final phase of a variety of cardiovascular diseases. Epidemiological data revealed that the morbidity of CHF is 0.9% in China, and there are 300,000 new CHF patients are diagnosed each year. Moreover, the total number of CHF patients exceeded 5.5 million throughout the country. Therefore, CHF has become a seriously social and public health problem in China.

Although medical treatment for CHF has achieved considerable progress, prognosis is still poor and mortality is high among end-stage HF patients. Since the 1990s, cardiac resynchronization therapy(CRT) has been applied to treat CHF, a large number of evidence-based medicine has shown that CRT brings great clinical effects; CRT mainly aims at delayed activation of left ventricular(LV) and stimulates LV in advance to restore the inter- and intra-ventricular synchrony. As a result, cardiac function, symptoms and quality of life in CHF patients improved, meanwhile mortality rate also decreases. At present, CRT is recommended in quite a number of CHF patients as class I indication. And yet, approximately 30%-40% of patients did not show response to CRT. Non-response to CRT has become a significant problem that must be solved. In recent years, researchers have tried LV multipoint pacing (MPP), transseptal left ventricular endocardial pacing and MitraClip to get some achievements. But these new techniques and CRT itself have two main failings:(1) Up to now, there is no specific suggestions about whether the patient's myocardium has too severe myocardial fibrosis and scar burden to be fit for CRT.(2)The LV mechanical dysynchronization will influence CRT effects. So far, screening CRT indications is primarily based on QRS morphology and duration on surface electrocardiogram.QRS duration≥120ms represents the presence of electrical dysynchronization, however, electrical dysynchronization is not equal to mechanical dysynchronization. The key point of CRT is to solve the mechanical dysynchronization, so estimating cardiac mechanical dysynchrony is important for predicting the CRT response; In addition, LV lead implantation site also exerts an effect on CRT response. The standard-of-care of LV lead implantation technique now just relays on coronary vein angiography showing the appropriate branch vein. This approach cannot guarantee LV lead is implanted in the latest activation site and the non-scar segment. Therefore, the following two issues are very important: how to evaluate the myocardiac scar and LV mechanical dyssynchronization using an objective, accurate, simple and economic method? and how to explore a new image which can guide LV lead to position at the latest activation and non-scar segment conveniently and accurately during procedure for improving CRT response rate? Myocardial perfusion image-phase analysis technique(MPI-PA) is a new non-invasive method to evaluate LV desynchronization,the latest activation site and myocardial scar burden. In recent years,Henneman MM and Adelstein EC reported PA technique detecting LV systolic desynchronization and LV scar burden influencing on CRT response respectively. Their study showed that the low CRT response is associated with the mild LV dyssynchrony and severe scar burden.The past five years,our center has completed a prospective, randomized, multi-center study of"SPECT guided LV Lead Placement for Incremental Benefits to CRT Efficacy"(GUIDE-CRT).We found that the CRT efficacy in SPECT-Guided group at 6 months after CRT implantation was better than that in standard-of-care implantation group(control group):the reduction in LVESV at 6 months in guided group is much more than that in control group(control 28.2ml vs guided group 48.2ml,P=0.029). The CRT response rate, defined as reduction in LVESV more than 15%, in guided group was 55.8% is higher than 47.8% in control group,but there was no statistic difference between two groups.The guiding mothodology of implanting LV lead in our previous study (GUIDE-CRT) was as following: implanter chose the branch vein to implant LV lead based on the recommended site by MPI-PA. Under this guidance, still much percentage of LV lead did not located in the recommended site. Therefore, in order to further improve the accuracy of SPECT guiding LV lead placement, our present study will use automatic fusion of coronary venogram with SPECT images to guide the implantation of LV lead precisely, and bringing incremental benefits to CRT efficacy.

This new study(GUIDE-CRT II) is a prospective, randomized, multi-center trial. Applying the new image fusion of SPECT MPI and coronary venogram to guide LV lead placement at the recommended optimal position, to achieve the precise localization, to avoid blindness of standard of care implantation methods and to improve response to CRT.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
300

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Jiangang Zou, MD,Ph.D
  • Phone Number: 86-25-13605191407
  • Email: jgzou@njmu.edu.cn

Study Locations

  • China
      • Beijing, China
        • Fu Wai Hospital
      • Shanghai, China
        • Shanghai Chest Hospital
      • Shanghai, China
        • Zhongshan Hospital
      • Xi'an, China
        • First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University
      • Xi'an, China
        • Xijing Hospital
    • Anhui
      • Hefei, Anhui, China
        • Anhui Provincial Hospital
    • Jiangsu
      • Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
        • The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University
      • Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China
        • Northern Jiangsu Province People's Hospital
    • Liaoning
      • Dalian, Liaoning, China
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University
      • Shenyang, Liaoning, China
        • The General Hospital of Shenyang Military
    • Sichuan
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China
        • West China Hospital
    • Zhejiang
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
        • Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
        • First Affiliated Hospital,Zhejiang University
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
        • First People's Hospital of Hangzhou

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has signed informed consent
  • moderate to severe HF (NYHA Class II, III or IV)
  • LVEF ≤35%
  • QRS duration ≥130 ms
  • sinus rhythm

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is under a minimum age requirement (<18 years old)
  • Patient has mechanical right heart valve
  • Patient has experienced unstable angina, acute MI, CABG or PCI within the past 3 months
  • Patient is on continuous or intermittent (i.e., more than two infusions per week) intravenous inotropic drug therapy
  • Patient known to have chronic permanent atrial arrhythmias (i.e., cases of long-standing atrial fibrillation of greater than 1 year, including those in which cardioversion has not been indicated or attempted).
  • Patient is enrolled in any other study
  • Patient has a life expectancy of less than 12 months
  • Women who are pregnant, or with child-bearing potential and who are not on a form of birth control
  • Patient with CRT device implanted previously
  • Patient has had a heart transplant
  • Patient has third degree AVB with normal cardiac function

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: GUIDED group
Image fusion of SPECT MPI and fluoroscopy venography to guide LV lead placement for improved CRT response in the guided group.
Other: Image fusion of SPECT MPI and fluoroscopy venography
In this study, MPI-Fluoro Fusion tool is used to help the implanting physicians to precisely implant LV lead to the optimal/suboptimal venous segments in the guided group.
No Intervention: Control group
No Image fusion of SPECT MPI and fluoroscopy venography to guide LV lead placement for improved CRT response.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in LVESV
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up
Changes in LVESV between baseline and 6-month follow-up (a continuous variable): LVESV will be assessed by echocardiography (Simpson's rule). Changes in LVESV will be compared between the two groups.
6-month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CRT response rate
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up
The proportion of the positive CRT response in each group. A positive CRT response is defined as reduction in LVESV by ≥15% and/or LVEF increase by ≥10% at 6-month follow-up as compared to the baseline.
6-month follow-up
Changes in LVEF
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up
LVEF will be assessed by echocardiography (Simpson's rule) and compared between the baseline and 6-month follow-up. Changes in LVEF will be compared between the two groups.
6-month follow-up
Composite clinical response rate
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up

A positive response is defined as decrease by ≥1 NYHA class and/or improvement in 6MWD by ≥10% and/or decrease in QOL score by ≥ 9 points at 6-month follow-up.

  • NYHA class: Changes in NYHA class at 6-month follow-up as compared to the baseline will be compared between the two groups.
  • 6MWD: Changes in 6MWD at 6-month follow-up as compared to the baseline will be compared between the two groups.
  • QOL: Changes in QOL score at 6-month follow-up as compared to the baseline will be compared between the two groups.
6-month follow-up
All-cause mortality and composite clinical endpoints
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up
All-cause mortality,all-cause death and heart failure re-hospitalization by the end of study.
6-month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region
Xijing Hospital
First People's Hospital of Hangzhou
Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
West China Hospital
First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University
Shanghai Chest Hospital
Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital
Nanjing Medical University
Fu Wai Hospital, Beijing, China
The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University
The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University
Anhui Provincial Hospital
Subei People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jiangang Zou, MD,Ph.D, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 14, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 14, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 21, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 24, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 17, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 13, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • FirstNanjingMU001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Image fusion of SPECT MPI and fluoroscopy venography

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings