Rapid Orocecal Transit Time and Fermentation in IBS. (RapidoIBS)

August 7, 2018 updated by: Per Hellström, Uppsala University

Orocecal Transit Time and Fermentation in IBS

Orocecal transit time is studied in individuals with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) of both the constipation-dominant, diarrhea-dominant, and mixed form using the lactulose hydrogen breath test for orocecal transit time through the gut. Data are compared to those of healthy volunteers. The peak value of fermentation as read by hydrogen levels is captured after passage of the orocecal segment in the colon. Comparison are made between IBS patients and healthy subjects as regards orocecal transit time and peak fermentation in the cecum.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Patients with IBS of various kind (constipation-dominant, diarrhea-dominant, and mixed form) in large numbers are studied as regards orocecal transit time and compared to healthy controls.

Inclusion criteria: IBS patients 18-80 years old, diagnosis of IBS; exclusion: Severe cardiac, pulmonary, liver or kidney disease, bloody stool After fasting for 12 hours, all subjects ingest 10 grams of lactulose. Hydrogen production, measured as hydrogen concentration in breath, is estimated at 10-minute intervals for a period of 240 minutes. The orocecal transit transit time is measured from ingestion of the lactulose solution until hydrogen peaks to 10 and 20 ppm when passing the ileocecal valve, being fermented by the cecal microflora. Data are compared to those of healthy volunteers.

The peak value of fermentation as read by hydrogen levels (ppm) captured after passage of the ilecocecal valve orocecal valve signifies the gas production of the micro13flora. Comparison are made between IBS patients and healthy subjects as regards orocecal transit time and peak fermentation in the cecum.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Sweden
    • Uppsala County
      • Uppsala, Uppsala County, Sweden, 75185
        • Recruiting
        • Uppsala University
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Per M Hellström, MD, Prof

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 76 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

IBS patients aged 18-80 years of age as recruited in the clinic, some of which are lactose intolerant, others are lactose tolerant.

Healthy volunteers 18-80 years of age as recruited in society in daily life activities.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy subjects, or IBS patients or either kind (IBS-C, IBS-D, IBS-M), no concomitant medication.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic disease, such cardiac, pulmonary, liver, kidney, endocrinological rheumatological, neurological or psychiatric disease plus, in addition, chronic medication.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Healthy volunteers
Normal subjects aged 18-80 years. No chronic diseases.
Diagnostic test: Lactulose breath test
Lactulose 0.67 mg/mL, dose 15 mL (10 grams). No contaminants of lactose. Pharmacy quality.
IBS patients, lactose intolerant
Subjects 18-80 years diagnosed with IBS for more than 6 months ago; lactose intolerant. No concomitant diseases.
Diagnostic test: Lactulose breath test
Lactulose 0.67 mg/mL, dose 15 mL (10 grams). No contaminants of lactose. Pharmacy quality.
IBS patients, lactose tolerant
Subjects 18-80 years diagnosed with IBS for more than 6 months ago; lactose tolerant. No concomitant diseases.
Diagnostic test: Lactulose breath test
Lactulose 0.67 mg/mL, dose 15 mL (10 grams). No contaminants of lactose. Pharmacy quality.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Orocecal transit time
Time Frame: 0-240 minutes
The transit rate of lactulose (foods) through the small intestine
0-240 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fermentation of lactulose of the cecal microbiota measured as increase of hydrogen in exhaled breath.
Time Frame: 0-240 minutes
The rise of hydrogen (beyond 10 and 20 ppm) after lactulose passing the ileo-cecal valve.
0-240 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Uppsala University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Per M Hellström, MD, PhD, Uppsala University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 3, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 2, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 5, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 9, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 7, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Orocecal lactulose breath

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Data are freely available to anyone. Data coded.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Oro-cecal Transit Time

Clinical Trials on Lactulose breath test

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings