Comprehensive Versus Traditional Lifestyle Program

June 7, 2017 updated by: Arlette Perry, University of Miami

THINK (Translational Health in Nutrition and Kinesiology) Junior Edition

Despite recommends that school-based interventions use a comprehensive approach for health promotions; most fitness programs exclusively emphasize physical activity. This study compared the comprehensive Translational Health in Nutrition and Kinesiology (THINK) program to a traditional YMCA program (The Sports, Play, and Active Recreation for Kids (SPARK) fitness curriculum) on measures of physical fitness, body composition, and executive cognitive function outcomes among 105 ethnic minority children (9±1.03 years old) following a 10-week intervention period.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Despite recommendations that school-based interventions use a comprehensive approaches for health promotions; most fitness programs exclusively emphasize physical activity. This study compared the comprehensive Translational Health in Nutrition and Kinesiology (THINK) program to a traditional YMCA program (The Sports, Play, and Active Recreation for Kids (SPARK) fitness curriculum) on measures of physical fitness, body composition, and executive cognitive function outcomes among 105 predominantly, ethnic minority children (9±1.03 years old) following a 10week intervention period.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

105

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

8 years to 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • To be eligible for this study, subjects had to be between the ages of eight and 12, enrolled in a YMCA program, and able to participate in physical activity. Parents were provided with information packets regarding project details, a parental consent form, and a child assent form. Once the subjects assented and parents consented, a health questionnaire regarding child's age, gender, race/ethnicity, health history and SES was completed.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with metabolic, cardiovascular, neuromuscular and psychological disorders and with medications that would interfere with testing results were excluded from the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: THINK
The Translational Health in Nutrition and Kinesiology (THINK) program will have education and fitness sessions lasting two hours, five times a week for a total of 10 weeks. Sessions will include theory, clinical laboratory activities, and physically active games to facilitate a fun environment to enhance physical and health-related fitness, improve nutrition and exercise knowledge and behaviors, and exercise enjoyment and self-confidence.
The THINK curriculum was based on the principles of exercise physiology and health behaviors. Sessions included educational components, concentrating on physiology, nutrition, laboratory experiences, and structured physical fitness activities.
Active Comparator: SPARK
This The Sports, Play, and Active Recreation for Kids (SPARK) group will receive the traditional YMCA SPARK after-school program. They will undergo the same pre and post testing protocol as the intervention group, but will not receive the THINK program.
traditional YMCA program

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Aerobic Fitness
Time Frame: Baseline and 10 Weeks
The National Institute of Medicine Toolbox two-minute Walk Endurance Test was used to measure aerobic fitness
Baseline and 10 Weeks
Change in Grip Strength
Time Frame: Baseline and 10 Weeks
Grip strength was measures using a Jamar plus handgrip dynamometer.
Baseline and 10 Weeks
Change in Abdominal Strength
Time Frame: Baseline and 10 Weeks
The one-minute curl-up test was used to measure abdominal strength and endurance.
Baseline and 10 Weeks
Change in Lower Body Strength
Time Frame: Baseline and 10 Weeks
Lower body strength, specifically for the quadriceps muscle group, was assessed with the wall squat test. A vertical jump test utilizing a Vertec. was used to assess lower body power . The vertical jump test data were used to estimate average power (W) according to the Lewis formula Average Power (W) = √4.9 x mass (kg) x √VJ (m) x 9.81.
Baseline and 10 Weeks
Change in Percent Body Fat
Time Frame: Baseline and 10 Weeks
Body composition and body fat was measured using the Inbody-520 multi-frequency bioimpedance analyzer.
Baseline and 10 Weeks
Change in BMIz
Time Frame: Baseline and 10 Weeks
A CDC growth chart statistical resource was used to calculate BMIz using height, weight, age, and gender.
Baseline and 10 Weeks
Change in Visceral Abdominal Fat
Time Frame: Baseline and 10 Weeks
The Saggital Abdominal Height was used as estimate of visceral abdominal fat using a portable anthropometer.
Baseline and 10 Weeks
Change in Waist circumference
Time Frame: Baseline and 10 Weeks
Waist circumference was used to measure central adiposity with a Gulick body tape measure.
Baseline and 10 Weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 1, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

June 9, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 9, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2017

Last Verified

June 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 20120486

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Only the study investigators and/or sponsor will monitor the plan for data and safety monitoring for this study. Shared data will be done through encrypted files and file management platform OneDrive.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on THINK

Search Similar Trials