Clinical Performance of BioCLIA Ro60

August 1, 2020 updated by: HOB Biotech Group

Evaluation of Clinical Performance of Serologic Anti-Ro60 Autoantibody Detection Kit on BioCLIA Platform

The study is to evaluate the clinical performance of BioCLIA Ro60 for measuring the autoantibody in autoimmune disease patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

100-200 clinically-diagnosed disease samples, as well as approximately 300 samples of various control diseases, will be used in the study. The specimen will be collected as the clinically leftover samples that have been used for routine clinical diagnosis purpose or research purpose, and with de-identification methods. Each set of samples will also be tested on a control serologic Anti-Ro60 detection kit, QUANTA Flash Ro60. Clinical sensitivity and clinical specificity will be analyzed for, also a method comparison conclusion will be drawn by comparing the two methods.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Irvine, California, United States, 92618
        • CRM Biotech

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Multiple sites for clinically leftover samples accessed through Access Biologicals not confined to any demographic groups, general health status nor geographic locations

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with relevant diseases, including Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and Sjogren's syndrome (SS)
  • Or diagnosed with other control diseases, including Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Infectious diseases and others

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Treatment with medicine that submerge the autoantibody concentration to non-detectable range
  • Co-diagnosed with multiple relevant diseases (e.g., SLE / SS) and/or control diseases
  • Hemolyzed sample.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Relevant Disease Samples
Samples are tested on BioCLIA Ro60 instrument with Ro60 assay reagents, also as comparison, tested on BioFLASH instrument with QUANTA Flash Ro60 reagents
Device: BioCLIA Ro60
BioCLIA Ro60 is a Chemiluminescent Immuno Assay (CLIA) as a fully automated testing process, reporting with arbitrary units, RU/mL
Control Disease Samples
Samples are tested on BioCLIA Ro60 instrument with Ro60 assay reagents, also as comparison, tested on BioFLASH instrument with QUANTA Flash Ro60 reagents
Device: BioCLIA Ro60
BioCLIA Ro60 is a Chemiluminescent Immuno Assay (CLIA) as a fully automated testing process, reporting with arbitrary units, RU/mL

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical performance of BioCLIA Ro60
Time Frame: 10 months
About 500 μl or more of each de-identified sample, in the form of serum or plasma, will be tested on-board with the automated BioCLIA serologic antinuclear antibodies (ANA) assay. Result will be reported in the form or IU/ml of antibodies in the samples. Clinical sensitivity of BioCLIA Ro60 will be determined by dividing the number of Ro60 positives by the number of relevant disease samples. Clinical specificity of BioCLIA will be determined by dividing the number of Ro60 negatives by the number of control disease samples.
10 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Method comparison between BioCLIA Ro60 and BioFlash/QUANTA Flash Ro60
Time Frame: 2 months
The same samples tested in BioCLIA Ro60 will be tested on-board with the automated BioFLASH instrument with QUANTA Flash Ro60 reagents. Result will be reported in the form of CU of antibodies in the samples. Clinical sensitivity of BioFLASH/QUANTA Flash Ro60 will be determined by dividing the number of Ro60 positives by the number of relevant disease samples. Clinical specificity of BioFLASH/QUANTA Flash Ro60 will be determined by dividing the number of Ro60 negatives by the number of control disease samples. Degree of agreement between BioCLIA Ro60 and BioFLASH/QUANTA Flash Ro60 will be calculated.
2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
HOB Biotech Group

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Polly Chan, PhD, CRM Biotech

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 8, 2017

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 16, 2020

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 16, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 28, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 28, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 2, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 4, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 1, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CRM CSP 001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings