Adolescent Anterior Knee Pain: ARP Wave Therapy vs. Physical Therapy

February 2, 2021 updated by: Eric Edmonds, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego

A Pilot Study in the Management of Adolescent Anterior Knee Pain: Electromyostimulation Compared to Standard Physical Therapy

Accelerated Recovery Performance (ARP) Wave therapy is an electromyostimulation therapy designed to enhance neuromuscular control in order to rehabilitate patients with musculoskeletal pathology. The outcomes of this technology have not been assessed under the rigors of clinical science. This prospective randomized crossover study will assess ARP Wave to both shorten duration of therapy and determine other advantages in the treatment of adolescent anterior knee pain. Two cohorts of teenagers will be followed weekly through either physical therapy (PT) or ARP Wave therapy, physiological therapy versus neurological therapy, respectively. Results should highlight the clinical utility of this modality and provide pilot data for future study.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study will utilize a prospective randomized cohort of adolescent patients that present to the orthopedic sports center (age restriction greater than 12 years old) with adolescent anterior knee pain. This knee pain includes: Osgood-Schlatter disease, Sindig-Larsen-Johanssen syndrome, patellofemoral syndrome, symptomatic medial plicae, and Hoffa fat pad syndrome/impingement. Although these diagnoses affect slightly different sites at the anterior knee, the underlying pathology is essentially the same: muscle inflexibility and core strength weakness. These are clinical diagnoses, and plain radiographs are expected to be normal with no significant osseous abnormalities other than possible apophyseal fragmentation. Skeletal maturity will not be an exclusion criteria; but, previous surgery, history of hemarthrosis, previous physical therapy due to lack of control within the cohorts, and/or diagnosis of ligament, meniscal, cartilage, or tendon injury will be criteria for exclusion.

Randomization by computer generated order of consent packets will be utilized once the family and patient agrees to undergo treatment via the proposed trial. Two cohorts of patients will be created: Cohort #1 and #2. Cohort #1 will consist of patients that begin with the PT portion of the study (2 sessions per week for 6 weeks per standard of care) and cross-over in the ARP Wave protocol (20 sessions over 4 weeks). Cohort #2 will consist of patients that begin with the ARP Wave protocol and then cross-over in the standard PT protocol.

Both cohorts will undergo physical therapy utilizing a standard of care uniform PT protocol for a traumatic knee pain that focuses on flexibility and development of hip core strength over a 6 week period, visiting the therapist twice per week and encouraged to maintain a home exercise program (HEP). They will all receive a handout with basic exercises to use at home to ensure that progress with their HEP is maximized (Appendix I). Basic stretches for the hamstring and quadriceps muscles will also be provided with line drawings. During this treatment period the patients will complete a daily diary of time spent on the HEP with attestation from their parents or guardians, in order to improve compliance.

Both cohorts will undergo the same ARP Wave protocol, as well. There are 20 sessions that are used to take a single individual through to completion of treatment over a period of 30 days. During that time frame the athletes are not allowed to undergo PT, HEP or their normal athletic endeavors since it may interfere with the neuromuscular training particular to this therapeutic modality. Treatments will be performed at an outside vendor that has agreed to perform the treatments at reduced cost for the sake of this study.

Both cohorts of patients will be evaluated every two weeks, for 10 weeks, by an independent team of observers who will be blinded to the actual cohort that the patient is randomized. These individuals will perform a Return to Sports (RTS) assessment and measurement of thigh circumference of the patients at these biweekly assessments. Although the RTS will not provide an objective measure of absolute core muscle strength, it does provide an objective measure of dynamic muscle function - which is the ultimate objective of these treatment modalities, not absolute strength of any given muscle such as the quadriceps. Moreover, the RTS makes an objective assessment of both strength and endurance of the core lower extremity muscle groups. These independent observers will also administer patient-derived outcome scores.

An interim analysis for each patient will be performed once they complete their first arm of the study. Both the research staff and the orthopedic surgeon principal investigator (PI) will examine the outcome variables at this time in insure safety in treatment. If the patients are scoring in the 95% percentile on all outcome measures, they will be considered as reaching the study endpoint and will not cross-over into the next phase of treatment. For patients who do not reach this 95% percentile of healing at the end of the first arm, crossover into the next arm of the study will occur immediately. At the end of 10 weeks and successful completion of both arms of the study, the patient will be seen by the orthopedic surgeon to make a final assessment regarding treatment progress, knee pain, and whether or not further treatment will be required (in the standard of care for these patients, regardless of study cohort).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
20

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92123
        • Recruiting
        • Rady Children's Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Eric W Edmonds, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Osgood-Schlatter disease, Sindig-Larsen-Johanssen syndrome, patellofemoral syndrome, symptomatic medial plicae, and Hoffa fat pad syndrome/impingement

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous knee surgery
  • History of hemarthrosis
  • Previous physical therapy (PT)
  • Diagnosis of ligament, meniscal, cartilage, or tendon injury.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Physical Therapy
Diagnostic test: Physical therapy
PT protocol for traumatic knee pain focuses on flexibility and development of hip core strength over a 6 week period, visiting the therapist twice per week and encouraged to maintain a home exercise program (HEP). They will all receive a handout with basic exercises to use at home to ensure that progress with their HEP is maximized (Appendix I). Basic stretches for the hamstring and quadriceps muscles will also be provided with line drawings. During this treatment period the patients will complete a daily diary of time spent on the HEP with attestation from their parents or guardians, in order to improve compliance.
Other Names:
  • PT
Active Comparator: ARP Wave Therapy
Device: Accelerated Recovery Performance Wave Therapy
ARP Wave therapy utilizes direct current compounded with a high frequency double exponential background waveform that creates an electromyostimulation with characteristics that contrast with more conventional therapeutic neuromuscular electrical stimulation, including: interferential, microcurrent, galvanic, Russian stimulation, and iontophoresis. ARPWave therapy is a class II FDA medical device that has been approved for muscle re-education, relaxation of muscle spasms, increased neovascularization, prevention of disuse atrophy, and maintaining/increasing joint range of motion. The ARPWave Rx100 uses a main electrostimulation pulse of 40 to 500 cycles per second that is coupled with a background high-frequency carrier signal at 10,000 cycles per second. The polarity direction of electron flow is reversible within the unit and this is utilized as part of the therapy.
Other Names:
  • ARP Wave therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Return to Sport test
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 10 weeks
objective assessment of both strength and endurance of the core lower extremity muscle groups
through study completion, an average of 10 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pedi-IKDC outcome score
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 10 weeks
assesses knee function in adolescents and children
through study completion, an average of 10 weeks
Kujala outcome score
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 10 weeks
assesses knee function in adolescents and children
through study completion, an average of 10 weeks
Marx outcome score
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 10 weeks
assesses knee function in adolescents and children
through study completion, an average of 10 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
STACK Velocity San Diego

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 9, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 16, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 19, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 21, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 4, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 2, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 151837

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Only those personnel listed on the IRB-approved study protocol will have access to IPD.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Pain Chronic

Clinical Trials on Physical therapy

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings