Secondary Intraocular Lens Implantation in Pediatric Patients

April 9, 2019 updated by: Haotian Lin, Sun Yat-sen University

Secondary Intraocular Lens Implantation in Pediatric Patients: Minimal Invasive Surgery vs. Traditional Cataract Surgery for Treating Congenital Cataracts

This prospective, non-randomized controlled study aiming at comparing the prognosis of minimal invasive lens surgery and traditional cataract surgery for treating congenital cataracts after the patient receives secondary intraocular artificial lens (IOL) implantation.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Pediatric patients received minimal invasive surgery and traditional lens removal surgery (anterior capsulorhexis and irrigation/aspiration and posterior capsulorhexis and anterior vitrectomy) are enrolled. The patients are assigned to two groups according to the strategy of primary surgery: Group I: the participants received minimal invasive surgery, while in Group II, the participants received a traditional cataract surgery. Investigators perform a secondary intraocular lens implantation for the patients. Investigators compare the visual acuity, incidence of high intraocular pressure, incidence of visual axis opacification, uveitis and iris/pupil abnormality between two groups after the first and the second surgery, aiming at comparing the prognosis of minimal invasive lens surgery and traditional cataract surgery for treating congenital cataracts.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510060
        • Recruiting
        • Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center,Sun Yat-sen U

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 6 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Age between 24 months and 72 months Uncomplicated congenital cataract and underwent cataract removal Informed consent signed by a parent or legal guardian

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intraocular pressure >21 mmHg at enrollment Preterm birth (<28 weeks) Presence of other ocular diseases (keratitis, keratoleukoma, aniridia, glaucoma) or systemic disease (congenital heart disease, ischemic encephalopathy) History of ocular diseases (any congenital eye diseases, such as, congenital cataract, congenital glaucoma, congenital aniridia) in the family History of ocular trauma Microcornea Persistent hyperplastic primary vitreous Rubella Lowe syndrome

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: minimal invasive surgery and secondary IOL implantation
We decreased the size of the capsulorhexis opening to 1.0-1.5 mm in diameter and moved the location of the capsulorhexis to the peripheral area of the lens instead of the central area. A 0.9 mm phacoemulsification probe was used to remove the lens contents and/or cortical opacities. Secondary IOL implantation: implant the IOL either into the capsule bag or fix at the ciliary sulcus.
Active Comparator: traditional cataract surgery and secondary IOL implantation

traditional cataract surgery: anterior continuous capsulorhexis + irrigation/aspiration + posterior capsulorhexis + anterior vitrectomy (ACCC+ I/A + PCCC + Anti-vit).

Secondary IOL implantation: implant the IOL either into the capsule bag or fix at the ciliary sulcus.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Best corrected visual acuity
Time Frame: recorded at each follow-up (one week, one month, three months, six months after surgery, and every six months thereafter)
measured using the Teller's acuity card, the Lea symbol visual acuity chart or the ETDRS chart according to the patient's age.
recorded at each follow-up (one week, one month, three months, six months after surgery, and every six months thereafter)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual axis opacification
Time Frame: recorded at each follow-up (one week, one month, three months, six months after surgery, and every six months thereafter)
Visual axis opacification was recorded by standardized slit lamp retroillumination.
recorded at each follow-up (one week, one month, three months, six months after surgery, and every six months thereafter)
High intraocular pressure
Time Frame: recorded at each follow-up (one week, one month, three months, six months after surgery, and every six months thereafter)
measured with Tono-pen tonometer
recorded at each follow-up (one week, one month, three months, six months after surgery, and every six months thereafter)
Bi-ocular visual function
Time Frame: The examination is performed when the patient is four years old and older, once a year.
determined with synoptophore
The examination is performed when the patient is four years old and older, once a year.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Haotian Lin, M.D,Ph.D, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 26, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 1, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

August 7, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CCPMOH2017-China-4

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Congenital Cataract

Clinical Trials on minimal invasive surgery and secondary IOL implantation

Search Similar Trials