Effects of Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Cognitive Function in Patients With Severe to Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

January 6, 2020 updated by: ADIR Association

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a leading cause of mortality worldwide.

It is a systemic disease which includes pulmonary, cardiac, muscular, digestive and cognitive impairments.

Pulmonary rehabilitation is a symptomatic treatment to reduce dyspnea and functional incapacity. However, it effects on cognitive dysfunction are not well known.

The aim of this study is to assess the effects of a comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation program on cognitive dysfunction in patients with severe to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment tool.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
56

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Bois-Guillaume, France, 76230
        • Bonnevie
      • Le Havre, France, 76600
        • Médrinal

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Every patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease referred for pulmonary rehabilitation in ADIR Association (Rouen, France) and the Groupe Hospitalier du Havre (Le Havre, France) will be assessed for eligibility.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18years;
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease stade III to IV;
  • Referred for pulmonary rehabilitation.

Non Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or likely to be;
  • History of psychiatric, neuro-vascular, cognitive disease or cranial trauma;
  • Active alcoholism;
  • Guardianship;
  • Hospitalisation for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the previous 4 weeks;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Interruption of the pulmonary rehabilitation program > 15 days;
  • Disruption of the training before the 18th session;
  • Less than 18 sessions in four month.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Pulmonary rehabilitation
The whole population will benefit from a comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation program, including aerobic training, superior and inferior limb strength training, self-management and add-on to pulmonary rehabilitation as needed (i.e : electrical muscle stimulation, inspiratory muscle training, non-invasive ventilation, high flow nasal canula).
Other: Pulmonary rehabilitation
See group description.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Baseline cognitive function
Time Frame: Cognitive function is assessed at the beginning of the rehabilitation program : day 0
Cognitive function is assessed with the Montreal Cognitive Assessement tool
Cognitive function is assessed at the beginning of the rehabilitation program : day 0
Cognitive function after pulmonary rehabilitation
Time Frame: Cognitive function is assessed at the end of the rehabilitation program : day 60
Cognitive function is assessed with the Montreal Cognitive Assessement tool
Cognitive function is assessed at the end of the rehabilitation program : day 60
Cognitive function : follow up
Time Frame: Cognitive function is assessed 3 month after rehabilitation : day 150
Cognitive function is assessed with the Montreal Cognitive Assessement tool
Cognitive function is assessed 3 month after rehabilitation : day 150
Change in cognitive function from baseline to the end of pulmonary rehabilitation
Time Frame: Change in cognitive function from baseline to the end of pulmonary rehabilitation is assessed with end of pulmonary rehabilitation minus baseline values (day 60 - day 0)
Cognitive function is assessed with the Montreal Cognitive Assessement tool
Change in cognitive function from baseline to the end of pulmonary rehabilitation is assessed with end of pulmonary rehabilitation minus baseline values (day 60 - day 0)
Change in cognitive function from the end of pulmonary rehabilitation to 3 month of follow up
Time Frame: Change in cognitive function from the end of pulmonary rehabilitation to 3 month of follow up is assessed with the 3 month of follow minus the end of pulmonary rehabilitation values (day 150 - day 60)
Cognitive function is assessed with the Montreal Cognitive Assessement tool
Change in cognitive function from the end of pulmonary rehabilitation to 3 month of follow up is assessed with the 3 month of follow minus the end of pulmonary rehabilitation values (day 150 - day 60)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anxiety and depression : baseline
Time Frame: Anxiety and depression are assessed at the beginning of the rehabilitation program : day 0
Anxiety and depression are assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HAD).
Anxiety and depression are assessed at the beginning of the rehabilitation program : day 0
Anxiety and depression : end of pulmonary rehabilitation
Time Frame: Anxiety and depression are assessed at the end of the rehabilitation program : day 60
Anxiety and depression are assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HAD).
Anxiety and depression are assessed at the end of the rehabilitation program : day 60
Anxiety and depression : follow up
Time Frame: Anxiety and depression are assesses 3 month after the end of pulmonary rehabilitation program : day 150
Anxiety and depression are assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HAD).
Anxiety and depression are assesses 3 month after the end of pulmonary rehabilitation program : day 150
Quality of life : baseline
Time Frame: Quality of life is assessed at the beginning of the rehabilitation program : day 0
Quality of life is assessed using the Saint Georges Respiratory Questionnaire
Quality of life is assessed at the beginning of the rehabilitation program : day 0
Quality of life : end of pulmonary rehabilitation
Time Frame: Quality of life is assessed at the end of the rehabilitation program : day 60
Quality of life is assessed using the Saint Georges Respiratory Questionnaire
Quality of life is assessed at the end of the rehabilitation program : day 60
Quality of life : follow-up
Time Frame: Quality of life is assessed 3 month after the end of the rehabilitation program : day 150
Quality of life is assessed using the Saint Georges Respiratory Questionnaire
Quality of life is assessed 3 month after the end of the rehabilitation program : day 150
Functional capacity (six-minute stepper test) : baseline
Time Frame: Functional capacity is assessed at the beginning of the rehabilitation program : day 0
Functional capacity is assessed with the six-minute stepper test
Functional capacity is assessed at the beginning of the rehabilitation program : day 0
Functional capacity (six-minute stepper test) : end of pulmonary rehabilitation
Time Frame: Functional capacity is assessed at the end of the rehabilitation program : day 60
Functional capacity is assessed with the six-minute stepper test
Functional capacity is assessed at the end of the rehabilitation program : day 60
Functional capacity (six-minute walk test) : baseline
Time Frame: Functional capacity is assessed at the beginning of the rehabilitation program : day 0
Functional capacity is assessed with the six-minute walk test
Functional capacity is assessed at the beginning of the rehabilitation program : day 0
Adherence
Time Frame: Adherence is assessed at the end of the rehabilitation program : day 60
Adherence to the pulmonary rehabilitation program is assessed by the following equation : number of session performed divided by the number of scheduled sessions
Adherence is assessed at the end of the rehabilitation program : day 60
Relation between the cognitive function and the respiratory function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second)
Time Frame: The relation is assessed between baseline demographic data at day 0
Cognitive function is assessed with the Montreal Cognitive Assessement tool and respiratory function is assessed with spirometric evaluation
The relation is assessed between baseline demographic data at day 0

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
ADIR Association

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Groupe Hospitalier du Havre
CHU de Rouen - Accueil

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Cuvelier Antoine, Prof, PhD, CHU-Hôpitaux de Rouen - Service de pneumologie, Hôpital de Bois-Guillaume, Rouen, France ; UPRES EA 3830, Institut de Recherche et d'Innovation Biomédicale de Haute-Normandie, Université de Rouen, Rouen, France.
  • Study Chair: Muir Jean-François, Prof, PhD, CHU-Hôpitaux de Rouen - Service de pneumologie, Hôpital de Bois-Guillaume, Rouen, France ; UPRES EA 3830, Institut de Recherche et d'Innovation Biomédicale de Haute-Normandie, Université de Rouen, Rouen, France ; ADIR Association, Bois-Guillaume, France.
  • Study Chair: Tardif Catherine, MD, CHU-Hôpitaux de Rouen - Hôpital de Bois-Guillaume, Service de physiologie urinaire, digestive, respiratoire et sportive, Bois-Guillaume, France
  • Study Chair: Viacroze Catherine, MD, CHU-Hôpitaux de Rouen - Hôpital de Bois-Guillaume, Service de pneumologie, Bois-Guillaume, France
  • Study Chair: Debeaumont David, MD, CHU-Hôpitaux de Rouen - Hôpital de Bois-Guillaume, Service de physiologie urinaire, digestive, respiratoire et sportive, Bois-Guillaume, France.
  • Study Chair: Patout Maxime, MD, UPRES EA 3830, Institut de Recherche et d'Innovation Biomédicale de Haute-Normandie, Université de Rouen, Rouen, France ; CHU-Hôpitaux de Rouen - Hôpital de Bois-Guillaume, Service de pneumologie, Bois-Guillaume, France
  • Study Chair: Lamia Bouchra, Prof, PhD, UPRES EA 3830, Institut de Recherche et d'Innovation Biomédicale de Haute-Normandie, Université de Rouen, Rouen, France ; Service de pneumologie, Hôpital de Bois-Guillaume, Rouen, France.
  • Study Chair: Quieffin Jean, MD, Service de pneumologie, Hôpital Jacques Monod 76290 Montivilliers.
  • Study Chair: Prieur Guillaume, PT, MsC, Service de pneumologie, Groupe Hospitalier du Havre, Fr
  • Study Chair: Médrinal Clément, PT, MsC, UPRES EA 3830, Institut de Recherche et d'Innovation Biomédicale de Haute-Normandie, Université de Rouen, Rouen, France. Service de réanimation, Groupe Hospitalier du Havre, France
  • Study Chair: Gravier Francis-Edouard, PT, ADIR Association, Bois-Guillaume, France
  • Study Chair: Bonnevie Tristan, PT, MsC, ADIR Association, Bois-Guillaume, France ; UPRES EA 3830, Institut de Recherche et d'Innovation Biomédicale de Haute-Normandie, Université de Rouen, Rouen, France.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 4, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 31, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 8, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 9, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 7, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 6, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PR-COPD

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary rehabilitation

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings