Comparison of Two Types of Braces in the Treatment of Rockwood Type III AC-dislocations
Conservative Treatment of Rockwood Type III Acromioclavicular Dislocation With Two Different Types of Braces: a Comparative Prospective Randomized Trial
In a randomised prospective comparative Trial the investigators aim to compare the conservative Treatment of acromioclavicular dislocations (Rockwood III) with a conventional sling versus a Acromion 2.0 brace, which exerts a direct Reposition force on the Joint.
The sling/brace will be worn for 6 weeks and the patients will be regularly checked clinically and radiologically.The investigators are interested in differences of shoulder function, Patient satisfaction as well as cosmetic and radiological results.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Basel, Switzerland, 4031
- Orthopädische Universitätsklinik Basel
-
Solothurn, Switzerland, 4500
- Bürgerspital Solothurn, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- First acute acromioclavicular dislocation Rockwood Type III
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous injury to acromioclavicular Joint
- Previous surgery of acromioclavicular Joint
- Known hypersensitivity or allergy to fabric of investigational product
- Pregnancy
- Known or suspected non-compliance, drug or alcohol abuse
- Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc. of the participant
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Acromion 2.0 Brace
|
Acromion 2.0 Brace will be worn for 6 weeks instead of the conventional Mitella sling
|
|
Active Comparator: Mitella Sling
|
Acromion 2.0 Brace will be worn for 6 weeks instead of the conventional Mitella sling
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Shoulder function
Time Frame: at 6 weeks
|
Constant-Score
|
at 6 weeks
|
|
Shoulder function
Time Frame: at 12 weeks
|
Constant-Score
|
at 12 weeks
|
|
Shoulder function
Time Frame: at 1 week
|
ASES-Score (American Shoulder and Elbow Score)
|
at 1 week
|
|
Shoulder function
Time Frame: at 6 weeks
|
ASES-Score (American Shoulder and Elbow Score)
|
at 6 weeks
|
|
Shoulder function
Time Frame: at 12 weeks
|
ASES-Score (American Shoulder and Elbow Score)
|
at 12 weeks
|
|
Shoulder function
Time Frame: at 1 week
|
Subjective Shoulder value (scale 0-100% where 100% equals a healthy shoulder)
|
at 1 week
|
|
Shoulder function
Time Frame: at 6 weeks
|
Subjective Shoulder value (scale 0-100% where 100% equals a healthy shoulder)
|
at 6 weeks
|
|
Shoulder function
Time Frame: at 12 weeks
|
Subjective Shoulder value (scale 0-100% where 100% equals a healthy shoulder)
|
at 12 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Degree of lateral clavicle dislocation
Time Frame: at initial presentation
|
Coracoclavicular distance on Panorama view in comparison to healthy side
|
at initial presentation
|
|
Degree of lateral clavicle dislocation
Time Frame: at 6 weeks
|
Coracoclavicular distance on Panorama view in comparison to healthy side
|
at 6 weeks
|
|
Degree of lateral clavicle dislocation
Time Frame: at 12 weeks
|
Coracoclavicular distance on Panorama view in comparison to healthy side
|
at 12 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Näder Helmy, PD, MD, Bürgerspital Solothurn, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Phillips AM, Smart C, Groom AF. Acromioclavicular dislocation. Conservative or surgical therapy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Aug;(353):10-7.
- Korsten K, Gunning AC, Leenen LP. Operative or conservative treatment in patients with Rockwood type III acromioclavicular dislocation: a systematic review and update of current literature. Int Orthop. 2014 Apr;38(4):831-8. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2143-7. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
- Smith TO, Chester R, Pearse EO, Hing CB. Operative versus non-operative management following Rockwood grade III acromioclavicular separation: a meta-analysis of the current evidence base. J Orthop Traumatol. 2011 Mar;12(1):19-27. doi: 10.1007/s10195-011-0127-1. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2017-00670
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation
-
NCT07024056Not yet recruitingAcromioclavicular Joint Dislocation | Acromioclavicular Joint
-
NCT02195219WithdrawnAcromioclavicular Joint Dislocation
-
NCT05397210RecruitingAcromioclavicular; Dislocation
-
NCT05501509Recruiting
-
NCT01274884CompletedAcromioclavicular Joint Dislocation
-
NCT01759147UnknownAcromioclavicular Joint Dislocation.
-
NCT04532216Not yet recruitingDislocation of the Acromioclavicular Joint
-
NCT05844098RecruitingAcromioclavicular Joint Dislocation
-
NCT02677441UnknownAcromioclavicular Joint Dislocation | Conservative Versus Surgical Management
-
NCT06019260Not yet recruitingAcromioclavicular Joint Dislocation
Clinical Trials on Acromion 2.0 Brace
-
NCT02049931Completed
-
NCT05001568Active, not recruitingScoliosis | Idiopathic Scoliosis
-
NCT06282770RecruitingSpinal Fusion | Chronic Lower Back Pain
-
NCT04586036CompletedAnkle Injuries | Ankle Sprains
-
NCT04012112Completed
-
NCT01375218CompletedHip Dislocation, Congenital | Congenital Deformity of Hip Joint
-
NCT04889339Not yet recruitingScoliosis | Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
-
NCT00580866TerminatedElbow Fracture | Upper Extremity Fracture | Fractures, Comminuted | Elbow Dislocation | Upper Extremity Dislocation
-
NCT03978273Recruiting
-
NCT01866176CompletedKnee Osteoarthritis