Quality of Life Assessment of Cryotherapy in Esophageal or Gastroesophageal Cancer (Cryotherapy)

October 8, 2019 updated by: Western Regional Medical Center

Quality of Life Assessment in Patients Receiving Cryotherapy in Addition to Chemotherapy for Palliation of Unresectable Esophageal or Gastroesophageal Cancer

Cryoablation combined with chemotherapy on the quality of life of patients with non resectable esophageal or gastroesophageal cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a single arm prospective study to determine the effect of cryoablation combined with chemotherapy on the quality of life of patients with non resectable esophageal or gastroesophageal cancer.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Arizona
      • Goodyear, Arizona, United States, 85338
        • Recruiting
        • Western Regional Medical Center, Inc.
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

patients with non resectable esophageal cancer

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Has esophageal or gastroesophageal cancer and will be receiving chemotherapy
  • Dysphagia score of 1, 2, 3 or 4.
  • Age ≥18 years old
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification ≤ 4
  • Deemed not a candidate for esophageal cancer surgical resection
  • Female subjects must be either post-menopausal, surgically sterilized, or willing to use an acceptable method of birth control (i.e., total abstinence, birth control pills, an intrauterine device (IUD), diaphragm, progesterone injections or implants, or condoms plus a spermicide) for the duration of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status greater than 2
  • Patient who received radiation treatment in the prior 8 weeks
  • Known brain metastases causing cranial nerve deficits which can cause dysphagia
  • Inability to undergo an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD)
  • Pregnant or nursing
  • Surgery or anatomy where capacity of stomach is reduced making cryotherapy contraindicated
  • Patients with tracheoesophageal fistula

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Non-operable esophageal cancer
Cryotherapy treatment
Device: Administration of questionaires to patients receiving an upper endoscopy with cryotherapy in addition to chemotherapy for esophageal cancer palliation.
Upper endoscopy with cryotherapy using liquid nitrogen.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in baseline quality of life (QOL) assessment using a modified EORTC QLQ-OES18 at 6 months compared to baseline
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in dysphagia score using the 5 point Likert scale at 1 to 2 weeks post-procedure compared to baseline
Time Frame: 1 to 2 weeks
1 to 2 weeks
Number of participants with adverse events as assessed by CTCAE 4.03.
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
Number of participants requiring alternative treatments for dysphagia palliation such as stenting, photodynamic therapy or brachytherapy and stenting
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Subjective Global Assessment scale of nutritonal status will be determined at baseline and approximately 3 month intervals.
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Tumor length in centimeters, endoscopist estimated luminal diameter and endoscopist subjective assessment of size as compared to the prior endoscopy will be determined
Time Frame: 1 to 12 weeks
1 to 12 weeks
Immunoassays will be obtained before and after treatment
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
local tumor control will be compared to systemic tumor control
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Survival while on cryotherapy and systemic chemotherapy will be measured.
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Change in baseline quality of life (QOL) assessment using a modified EORTC QLQ-OES18 at 1 to 2 weeks compared to baseline
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Western Regional Medical Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Toufic Kachaamy, MD, Western Regional Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 13, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 13, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 13, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 28, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 12, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 15, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 11, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 8, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • WG2015029

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Esophageal Cancer

Clinical Trials on Administration of questionaires to patients receiving an upper endoscopy with cryotherapy in addition to chemotherapy for esophageal cancer palliation.

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings