Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematoma

March 2, 2021 updated by: Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization via a minimally invasive endovascular approach has been attempted with the goal of eliminating the arterial supply to the vascularized membrane. The investigators have recently presented the first known case series of MMA embolization as upfront treatment for cSDH in lieu of surgical evacuation (publication pending). Five patients underwent successful embolization of the MMA with subsequent reduction in size or complete resolution of cSDH with no peri-procedural complications.

The purpose of this study will be to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MMA embolization compared to traditional surgical management for symptomatic, chronic, and medically refractory SDH. MMA embolization is an established procedure used routinely for treatment of tumors or vascular malformations; this study investigates the use of an established procedure for a new disease. The investigators hypothesize that MMA embolization will afford a particularly fragile patient population an alternative to invasive and morbid neurosurgical intervention.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study will be to evaluate the safety and efficacy of middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization compared to traditional surgical management for symptomatic, chronic, and medically refractory subdural hematoma (SDH). MMA embolization is an established procedure used routinely for treatment of tumors or vascular malformations; this study investigates the use of an established procedure for a new disease. The investigators hypothesize that MMA embolization will afford a particularly fragile patient population an alternative to invasive and morbid neurosurgical intervention.

Since subjects being enrolled will be those that are symptomatic from chronic SDH, pre-procedural data such as clinical history, neurologic examination, and CT scans will already be available. The day after the embolization, subjects will undergo a clinical interview to assess change in symptoms. A neurologic exam and CT scan will also be performed prior to discharge. Telephone surveys will be used at intermittent time points to assess for change in clinical symptoms. The subjects will also present in clinic for a follow up clinical interview, neurologic exam, and CT scan at 2 and 6 weeks post-procedure. This follow up care including the CT scans is considered standard of care for patients undergoing surgery for chronic SDH and it will not expose them to any additional tests or imaging studies.

MMA embolization is done under moderate sedation or general anesthesia using biplane fluoroscopy. Briefly, common femoral artery access is obtained, and a guide catheter is advanced into the external carotid artery. A microcatheter is then advanced into the internal maxillary artery and then the MMA. Particles are then injected. A post-procedure carotid angiography is performed to ensure no reflux of particles into the internal carotid artery circulation. The guide catheter is then removed and femoral hemostasis is obtained. Subjects recover from anesthesia and are observed overnight, undergo a non-contrast head CT the next day, and discharged if appropriate.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
6

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • Weill Cornell Medical College

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age must be greater or equal to 18 years of age.
  • Subjects must have a diagnosis of chronic or acute-on-chronic subdural hematoma based on brain imaging, as documented by an independent radiologist.
  • One or more symptoms attributable to chronic SDH including headache, cognitive impairment, gait instability, seizure, or mild focal neurologic deficit.
  • In the opinion of the site investigator or the subject's referring physician, the subject has failed conservative management.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The subdural hematoma is causing mass effect significant enough to cause marked or progressive neurologic impairment.
  • Any requirement for urgent surgical evacuation is necessary.
  • Life expectancy is less than 6 months in the opinion of the subject's primary physician.
  • Markedly tortuous vasculature precluding safe endovascular access, as assessed on angiogram.
  • Acute subdural hematomas.
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization
Procedure: Middel Meningeal Artery Embolization
Blood supply to the subdural hematoma via the middle meningeal artery is interrupted.
Other Names:
  • MMA

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in neurological status after embolization of the MMA for symptomatic, chronic, and medically refractory SDH.
Time Frame: The neurological exam will be performed before the procedure, the day after the procedure, and at 2 and 6 weeks post-procedure to assess any changes in neurological status.
A neurological exam will be performed to assess any neurological changes post-procedure.
The neurological exam will be performed before the procedure, the day after the procedure, and at 2 and 6 weeks post-procedure to assess any changes in neurological status.
Changes in size of the SDH post-procedure.
Time Frame: A head CT will be performed to assess the size of the SDH post-procedure. This will occur before the procedure, the day after the procedure, and at 2 and 6 weeks post-procedure.
A CT scan will be performed to assess the size of the SDH before and after the procedure.
A head CT will be performed to assess the size of the SDH post-procedure. This will occur before the procedure, the day after the procedure, and at 2 and 6 weeks post-procedure.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The safety of embolization of the MMA for symptomatic, chronic, and medically refractory SDH
Time Frame: Pre-procedure, 1 day post-procedure, and 2 and 6 weeks post-procedure.
A neurologic exam will be performed to assess any neurological deficits and/or improvements post-procedure.
Pre-procedure, 1 day post-procedure, and 2 and 6 weeks post-procedure.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jared Knopman, MD, Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 31, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 30, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 28, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 4, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 11, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 4, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 2, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1611017746

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

De-identified participant data for primary and secondary outcome measures will be available.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available within one year of study completion

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data access requests will be reviewed by the PI.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Subdural Hematoma

Clinical Trials on Middel Meningeal Artery Embolization

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings