Group Dialectical Behavior Therapy as add-on Treatment for Adults With Attention Deficit/Hyperactive Disorder

February 14, 2020 updated by: Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre

Randomized Clinical Trial With Adapted Skill Training Group From Dialectical Behavior Therapy as add-on Treatment for Adults With Attention Deficit/Hyperactive Using Medication

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactive Disorder (ADHD) in adults is associated with global impairments and deficits in quality of life. The ADHD functional impairments during adulthood usually persist even after adequate medication treatment. The Skill Training Group of the Dialectical Behavioral Therapy (DBT) is one of the group therapies that had been adapted for the specific treatment of ADHD patients. Our primary aim is to explore the feasibility of the approach in different culture and to evaluate the efficacy of the Skill Training Group as an add-on treatment for adults using ADHD medication. This is a Randomized Clinical Trial comparing the Skill Training Group added to stimulants to treatment as usual. 52 adults previously diagnosed with ADHD and treated with stimulants in our ADHD outpatient program will be enrolled. Only patients with residual symptoms will be included (ADHD-Self Report Scale - ASRS ≥ 20). The intervention comprises the standard 12 sessions therapy program. The groups will have between 8 and 12 patients each, and will be conducted by a trained DBT therapist with supervision from a senior DBT therapist. The primary outcome will be the ASRS scores. Secondary outcomes include scores in ADHD Quality of Life, Beck's Depression Inventory, Beck's Anxiety Inventory, and performance in a neuropsychological test (difference between pre and post-intervention) (Stop Signal Task). Adherence to the protocol will also be checked. The recruitment was initially scheduled for beginning in November.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
31

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Brazil
    • Rio Grande Do Sul
      • Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil, 90035-903
        • Centro de Pesquisa Clinica

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with ADHD
  • Medicated with following drugs and minimum daily dosages:

Methylphenidate ≥ 0.5 mg/kg Lisdexamfetamine ≥ 30mg Bupropion ≥ 150 mg Modafinil ≥ 200mg Imipramine ≥ 1mg/kg

  • At least one month of stabilized dosage for any psychiatric medication.
  • ADHD-Self Report Scale ≥ 20.
  • Knowledge of oral and written communication in Portuguese
  • IQ>85 (intelligence quotient)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • diagnoses of Borderline or Anti-social personality disorders.
  • diagnoses of autism spectrum disorder
  • current episode of major depression or suicide toughs
  • current episodes of mania or hypomania
  • recent episodes of drug abuse (last 6 months)
  • diagnoses of drug dependence
  • patients that change their medications or their psychiatric conditions in the exclusion criteria above after the beginning of the protocol will have their data censored, but included in the intention to treat analyses. These patients will keep the right to attend all the sessions in the protocol at their discretion.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Skill Training Group
A twelve sessions protocol of the Skill Training Group of the Dialectical Behavior Therapy.
Behavioral: Skill Training Group of the Dialectical Behavior Therapy
A 12 session version of the Skill Training Group of the Dialectical Behavior Therapy, adapted for treatment of ADHD.
Active Comparator: Treatment as Usual
Patients will have one psychiatric session to control their medication adherence.
Other: Treatment as Usual
Conventional protocol using only medication (including drug adherence).
Other Names:
  • waiting list

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactive Disorder Self Rating Scale
Time Frame: 12 Weeks

Sefl rated scale to measure Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Symptoms Symptoms.

ASRS has 18 questions about ADHD symptoms. Each question is scored between 0 (never happen), and 4 (very frequently). The total score goes from 0 up to 72. Higher scores mean more symptoms and higher ADHD's impairments.
12 Weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactive Disorder Self Rating Scale - Mid-treatment
Time Frame: 6 Weeks
Sefl rated scale to measure Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Symptoms. ASRS has 18 questions about ADHD symptoms. Each question is scored between 0 (never happen), and 4 (very frequently). The total score goes from 0 up to 72. Higher scores mean more symptoms and higher ADHD's impairments.
6 Weeks
Change in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactive Disorder Quality of Life
Time Frame: 12 Weeks

"Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Quality-of-Life Scale (AAQoL)" is a Self-rated scale for quality of life in ADHD.

The scale has 29 questions ranging from 1 to 5. The AaQol focuses on four areas of patients quality of life: mental health, life goals, productivity, and relationships. The total scores go from 0 to 145. Higher scores mean the patient has a worse perception of his quality of life.
12 Weeks
Change in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactive Disorder Quality of Life - Mid-treatment
Time Frame: 6 weeks

"Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Quality-of-Life Scale (AAQoL)" is a Self-rated scale for quality of life in ADHD.

The scale has 29 questions ranging from 1 to 5. The AaQol focuses on four areas of patients quality of life: mental health, life goals, productivity, and relationships. The total scores go from 0 to 145. Higher scores mean the patient has a worse perception of his quality of life.
6 weeks
Change in Beck Depression Inventory
Time Frame: 12 Weeks
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is a Self-rated scale for depression. BDI has 21 questions ranging from 0-4, with the maximum score being 63. Higher scores mean higher depression levels. Scores between 0-13 are considered minimal depression, between 14 and 19 are considered mild depression, from 20 to 28 moderate depression, over 29 are considered severe depression.
12 Weeks
Change in Beck Depression Inventory - Mid-treatment
Time Frame: 6 Weeks
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is a Self-rated scale for depression BDI has 21 questions ranging from 0-4, with the maximum score being 63. Higher scores mean higher depression levels. Scores between 0-13 are considered minimal depression, between 14 and 19 are considered mild depression, from 20 to 28 moderate depression, over 29 are considered severe depression.
6 Weeks
Change in Beck Anxiety Inventory
Time Frame: 12 Weeks
Beck Anxiety Inventory is a Self-rated scale for anxiety. BAI has 21 questions ranging from 0-4, with the maximum score being 63. Higher scores mean higher anxiety levels. Scores between 0-9 are considered normal, between 10 and 18 are considered mild to moderate anxiety, from 19 to 29 moderate to severe anxiety, over 30 are considered severe anxiety.
12 Weeks
Change in Beck Anxiety Inventory - Mid-treatment
Time Frame: 6 Weeks
Beck Anxiety Inventory is a Self-rated scale for anxiety. BAI has 21 questions ranging from 0-4, with the maximum score being 63. Higher scores mean higher anxiety levels. Scores between 0-9 are considered normal, between 10 and 18 are considered mild to moderate anxiety, from 19 to 29 moderate to severe anxiety, over 30 are considered severe anxiety.
6 Weeks
Change in the reflexive function questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 weeks
A self-reported scale to measure reflexive psychological functions. The questionnaire has 8 questions variating from one to seven. Total scores have ranged between 8 and 56. Better reflexive functions mean lowers scores on the scale.
12 weeks
Change in the reflexive function questionnaire - Mid-treatment
Time Frame: 6 weeks
A self-reported scale to measure reflexive psychological functions. The questionnaire has 8 questions variating from one to seven. Total scores have ranged between 8 and 56. Better reflexive functions mean lowers scores on the scale.
6 weeks
Change in the Go NoGo
Time Frame: 14 weeks

Computer-based psychometric task. Consists of three stimuli, one green arrow to left, one pointing to the right, and one arrow pointing to both sides. Subjects have to press correctly to right or left in the presence of the correspondent arrow or do not press any in the presence of the arrow to both sides. The task takes around 5 minutes.

The aim is to measure impulsivity through response times, commissions and errors.
14 weeks
Change in Stroop Task
Time Frame: 14 Weeks
neuropsychological test to measure response inhibition (impulse control). The task has four stimuli, two green arrows, pointing to the right or left, and two red arrows, pointing to the right or left. When the green stimuli appear the subject must press the button to the correspondent side, in the appearance of the red stimuli the subject must press a button of the opposing side.
14 Weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Luis Augusto Rohde, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 7, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 24, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 27, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 9, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 25, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 31, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 17, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 14, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 17-0358
  • 65041316400005327 (Other Identifier: CAAE)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

Patient's individual data will be available only for the researchers and additional members of the research team, and for the patients it self.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Clinical Trials on Skill Training Group of the Dialectical Behavior Therapy

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings