Quality of Life and Health Utility of Patients With CHB Infections

October 30, 2017 updated by: Professor Cindy L.K. Lam, The University of Hong Kong

Quality of Life and Health Utility of Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B Infections

The aim of the study is to assess the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and preference-based health utilities of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) carriers in different stages of illness. It will also estimate the cost-effectiveness of anti-viral treatments resulting from the prevention of the progression of disease from uncomplicated CHB carriers to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

The following hypotheses will be tested:

  1. Patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) have poorer health-related quality of life (HRQOL) than the general population;
  2. Patients with more severe stages of chronic HB infections have lower health related quality of life and health utility values;
  3. Anti-viral treatment can improve the HRQOL and health utility for patients with CHB infections;
  4. The cost-effectiveness of different treatments for chronic HBV infections can be directly compared in terms of cost/QALY gained.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Design, Setting & Subjects: A cross-sectional study and biomathematical modelling will be carried out. In the cross-sectional study, patients known to CHB carriers will be identified from the registries of the Ap Lei Chau, Aberdeen and Sai Yung Pun General Outpatient Clinics and Queen Mary Hospital. The biomathematical modelling will use a simulated cohort of patients aged 18 or above with CHB infections who may receive treatment in Hong Kong. Published data on the benefit of anti-viral treatments and the cross-sectional study data on preference-based health utility values of different stages of CHB infections will be used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of different treatment strategies using Markov modelling.

Interventions: Each subject in the cross-sectional study will be interviewed. Five strategies for management of CHB infections: 1) No treatment, 2) Interferon monotherapy, 3) lamivudine monotherapy, 4) adefovir and 5) combined treatment of lamivudine and adefovir, will be tested in the biomathematical modelling,.

Main Outcome Measures: Health-related quality of life measured by the SF-36, preference-based health utilities measured by the SF-6D. quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and cost of different treatment strategies for HBV infection.

Hypothesis: HRQOL and health utilities of patients with different illness stages, and the QALYs gained and cost-effectiveness of different therapeutic strategies will be established. The results will provide information on the health burden of CHB infections, and evidence on the cost-effectiveness of anti-viral treatments in preventing disease progression can be directly compared.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
589

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Hong Kong
      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Two Regional Hospitals

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Chinese adults with chroni hepatits B infection.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Subjects will be included in the study if they:

  1. Are 18 years and above in age;
  2. Are known to be HBsAg positive for more than six months;
  3. Can be classified into one of the following sages of liver diseases:

(i) Uncomplicated CHB: Patients with chronic CHB infections but normal liver function and without cirrhosis or HCC.

(ii) CHB with impaired liver function or compensated cirrhosis, not on anti-viral treatment.

(iii) CHB with impaired liver function or compensated cirrhosis, on anti-viral treatment.

(iv) Decompensated cirrhosis: Patients with CHB infection and cirrhosis complicated by one or more of the following: variceal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy or ascites.

(v) Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Patients with confirmed diagnosis of HCC

d. Have given written consent to take part in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects will be excluded from the study if they have one of the following:

  1. Unable to understand and communicate in Chinese Language;
  2. Known cognitive impairment;
  3. Diagnosed end-stage non-hepatitis B related chronic illness such as terminal cancer;
  4. Patients currently abusing alcohol (>30 units/week) or illegal drugs;
  5. Co-infection with HIV, hepatitis C virus (HCV) or hepatitis D virus (HDV);
  6. Post-liver transplant;
  7. Refuse to give consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
1 Uncomplicated CHB
Patients with chronic CHB infections but normal liver function and without cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma
2 CHB with impaired liver function (LF) or CC w/o tx
CHB with impaired liver function or compensated cirrhosis, not on anti-viral treatment
3 CHB with impaired LF or CC with tx
CHB with impaired liver function or compensated cirrhosis, on anti-viral treatment.
4 Decompensated cirrhosis
Patients with CHB infection and cirrhosis complicated by one or more of the following: variceal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy or ascites.
5 Hepatocellular carcinoma
Patients with confirmed diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
SF-36 Health-related quality of life scores
Time Frame: Baseline
The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health. It consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability.
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
SF-6D Preference-based health utilities
Time Frame: Baseline
The Short Form-6 Dimension (SF-6D) is a widely used preference-based generic HRQOL measure with a multiattribute classification system consisting of six dimensions: physical functioning, role functioning, social functioning, pain, mental health, and vitality. Each dimension is composed of three to five levels. The SF-6D values range from 0.315 to 1, with higher scores indicating better HRQOL anchoring on the 0 (dead) to 1 (full health) scale.
Baseline
Quality adjusted life years
Time Frame: Baseline
To calculate QALYs under different anti-viral treatments that prevent progressions to cirrhosis and HCC, the life expectancy of a person with or without cirrhosis or HCC will be estimated, starting with the age of 18.
Baseline
Costs of different treatment strategies for HBV infection
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
The University of Hong Kong

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Hospital Authority, Hong Kong

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 24, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 30, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 6, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 6, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 30, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HKCTR-151

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Hepatitis B Infection

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings