Healthful Diets and Risk of Hearing Loss

November 21, 2017 updated by: Gary C Curhan, Brigham and Women's Hospital

Healthful Dietary Patterns and Risk of Hearing Loss in Women

To prospectively examine the relations between adherence scores for three healthful dietary patterns, the Alternate Mediterranean diet (AMED), the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH), and the Alternative Healthy Eating Index (AHEI-2010), and risk of hearing loss in the Nurses' Health Study II.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
70966

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

27 years to 66 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The Conservation of Hearing Study (CHEARS) examines risk factors for hearing loss among participants in the Nurses' Health Study II, an ongoing cohort study of 116,430 female registered nurses in the US, aged 25-42 at enrollment in 1989. Participants have been followed by biennial mailed questionnaires that elicit updated information on diet, lifestyle, and various health outcomes; the follow-up rate over 26 years exceeds 90% of the eligible person-time. After exclusions, a total of 70,966 women were included in the analyses.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The investigators limited the study to women who provided information on their hearing on the 2009 or 2013 questionnaire.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The investigators excluded those who did not provide responses to the hearing questions on either questionnaire, reported a hearing problem that began before baseline for the current analysis (1991) or did not report date of onset, or reported cancer other than non-melanoma skin cancer. The investigators also excluded women who did not complete the baseline diet questionnaire and who had missing diet information for each subsequent time period.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Nurses' Health Study II
Nurses' Health Study II, an ongoing cohort study of 116,430 female registered nurses in the US, aged 25-42 at enrollment in 1989. Participants have been followed by biennial mailed questionnaires that elicit updated information on diet, lifestyle, and various health outcomes; the follow-up rate over 26 years exceeds 90% of the eligible person-time.
Other: no intervention-this was an observational study

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hearing loss
Time Frame: 1991-2013
The primary outcome, self-reported hearing loss that was moderate or worse in severity, was determined based on responses to the 2009 and 2013 questionnaires on which participants were asked about their hearing. On the 2009 main questionnaire, participants were asked, "Do you have a hearing problem?" (no, mild, moderate, severe), and "At what age did you first notice a change in your hearing?" On the 2013 main questionnaire, participants were asked, "Which best describes your hearing?" (excellent, good, a little hearing trouble, moderate hearing trouble, deaf), and "Have you noticed a change in your hearing?" and, if the response was "Yes," "At what age did you first notice a change in your hearing?"
1991-2013

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
hearing loss in HSSQ
Time Frame: 1991-2013
Detailed hearing-related information was collected electronically in 2012 supplemental questionnaire from a representative subcohort of NHS II participants (n= 33,102) with and without reported hearing problems, including information on previous evaluation for hearing loss, laterality (unilateral or bilateral), and identified causes of hearing loss (e.g. ototoxic medications, ear trauma, otosclerosis, cholesteatoma, Meniere's disease, chronic ear infection). Data from the HSSQ were used to conduct sensitivity analyses using more refined case definitions (e.g. excluding known etiologies and unilateral hearing loss).
1991-2013

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Brigham and Women's Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Gary Curhan, MD, ScD, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 1991

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 19, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 21, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 22, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 22, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 21, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2007P000876

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

For investigators who wish to use the investigators' data, the investigators have adopted a data enclave approach to data sharing within the Nurses' Health Study II cohort. Along with a general description of the cohorts and questionnaires that have been used since 1989 (NHS II), guidelines are available upon request for outside users to access the resources of our studies. Typically, an outside user prepares a brief proposal that is reviewed by the Channing investigator group to identify a local investigator to assist the outside investigator. If uncertainty arises as to the merit of a request, the External Advisory Committees makes a final decision. After approval, the investigators facilitate access to our data either through programming support or orientation to the data.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings