Clinical and Radiological Outcomes: Two-level Cervical ProDisc-C Vivo Versus Hybrid Construct.

December 4, 2017 updated by: guochen, Peking University People's Hospital

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of a 7-year Follow-up, Multi-center, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial: Two-level Cervical ProDisc-C Vivo Versus Hybrid Construct.

The objective of this study is to investigate the clinical and radiological results of two-level cervical ProDisc-C vivo versus hybrid construct.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial at 7 years of follow-up comparing two level ProDisc-C vivo artificial cervical disc replacement and hybrid construct, i.e., combining ACDF (Anterior cervical discectomy fusion) and ProDisc-C vivo to treat degenerative disc disease (DDD). 542 DDD patients (age from 20 to 70) from several hospitals matching the inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned to two groups (271 patients in each group). One group will be treated with two level ProDisc-C vivo disc replacement. The other group will be treated with hybrid construct. Clinical outcomes and radiological analysis will be done at 1.5, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 60, and 84 months after the surgical treatments.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
542

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A diagnosis of degenerative disc disease with radiculopathy or myeloradiculopathy at 2 contiguous levels from C-3 to C-7.
  • The symptom is unresponsive to nonoperative treatment for at least 6 weeks.
  • The patient demonstrates progressive symptoms calling for immediate surgery.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any prior cervical spine surgery.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Two level Prodisc-C vivo
Two level Prodisc-C vivo cervical artificial disc replacement.
Procedure: Two level Prodisc-C vivo
Two level of Prodisc-C vivo artificial disc replacement will be done in one group of patients.
Active Comparator: Hybrid
This group of patients will be treated with hybrid construct, i.e., one level of Prodisc-C vivo and one level of anterior cervical discectomy fusion (ACDF).
Procedure: Hybrid
The hybrid method will be used in one group of patients.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of overall success rate
Time Frame: The overall success will be assessed at each time point (1.5, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 60, and 84 months after the surgical treatments).
A patient's outcome was considered an overall success if all of the following conditions were met:1) postoperative (Neck Disability Index) NDI score improvement of at least a 15-point increase from preoperative score; 2) maintenance or improvement in neurological status; 3) disc height success; 4) no serious adverse event classified as implant associated or implant/surgical procedure associated; and 5) no additional surgical procedure classified as a "failure".
The overall success will be assessed at each time point (1.5, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 60, and 84 months after the surgical treatments).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of sagittal angular motion
Time Frame: The radiographs will be obtained at each study point (before surgery,1.5, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 60, and 84 months after the surgical treatments).
Neutral anteroposterior and lateral radiographs and dynamic flexion-extension lateral radiographs.
The radiographs will be obtained at each study point (before surgery,1.5, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 60, and 84 months after the surgical treatments).
Change of NDI Scores
Time Frame: The NDI scores will be assessed at each study point (before surgery,1.5, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 60, and 84 months after the surgical treatments).
The neck disability index(NDI) questionnaire measures the level of pain and disability associated with various activities. The NDI is a 10-item, 50-point index that assesses different aspects of daily functioning in patients with neck pain. Each item is scored 0 to 5. The NDI score is a sum of the scores of the10-item. Clinical effects will be evaluated based on scores of the NDI. Higher values represent a better outcome.
The NDI scores will be assessed at each study point (before surgery,1.5, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 60, and 84 months after the surgical treatments).
Change of Arm and Neck pain
Time Frame: Neck and arm pain scores will be measured at each study point (before surgery,1.5, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 60, and 84 months after the surgical treatments).
Neck and arm pain scores will be measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS) from "0' (no sensation) to '100"(the most intense pain imaginable) where 30 means "pain threshold".
Neck and arm pain scores will be measured at each study point (before surgery,1.5, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 60, and 84 months after the surgical treatments).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Peking University People's Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Chen Guo, Master, Peking University People's Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 29, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 4, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 8, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 8, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 4, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • twolevelprodiscC

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings