Understanding Concussion/Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

April 17, 2018 updated by: Blinktbi, Inc.
Using the Blink Reflexometer, athletes are scanned if they are potentially thought to have a concussion during a game or practice.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

In a blinded trial, any patient who during a game or practice situation had head contact, thus possible Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) aka Concussion, in addition to the current approved protocols, patients are scanned with the Blink Reflexometer. Results are not available until the end of the season, thus eliminating the potential of someone relying on the results. The Blink Reflexometer uses 5 puffs of air on the side of the eye over 20 seconds. The air causes a blink reflex which is being correlated to a concussion. The results of the blink post concussion are compared to a baseline scan taken at the beginning of the season.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
477

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28216
        • Johnson. C. Smith University
    • Pennsylvania
      • Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States, 17033
        • Hershey Bears Ice Hockey Team
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29406
        • The Citadel
      • North Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29418
        • South Carolina Stingrays
      • Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States, 29307
        • Spartinburg High School

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Healthy volunteers with a minimum age of 14yo. Any sex, nationality, sport played, etc are accepted.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Read, understand and sign patient consent (parent approval needed when pt is under 18yo)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed concussion in past 4 weeks
  • Ingesting any drugs banned by the US Anti-doping Association (USADA)
  • Never prior diagnosed with a neurological abnormality, including Alzheimer's, MS, Huntington's, Epilepsy, etc.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Normal Volunteer
Volunteers who report to have never had a concussion and are not at high risk of getting a concussion are scanned to obtain a baseline of all ages, sex, race, etc. All patients will be scanned with the Blink Reflexometer.
Device: Blink Reflexometer
The device uses 5 light puffs of air to the side of the eye causing a blink reflex that is captured by the high-speed camera tracking the eyelids.
Concussion Protocol
Athletes who had a potential concussion and will go through any stage of the approved protocol, are scanned by the Blink Reflexometer device. Results are then analyzed prior to unblinding the clinical diagnosis from an Athletic Trainer and/or Neurologist.
Device: Blink Reflexometer
The device uses 5 light puffs of air to the side of the eye causing a blink reflex that is captured by the high-speed camera tracking the eyelids.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of Concussion Diagnosis
Time Frame: Data unblinded May 1, 2018 or at completion of season, which ever comes first.
The results from the Blink machine should match the physicians diagnosis.
Data unblinded May 1, 2018 or at completion of season, which ever comes first.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Contributing Factors
Time Frame: Data unblinded May 1, 2018 or at completion of season, which ever comes first.
There are a number of factors that could possible change the blink reflex such as Caffeine and Tobacco. We are capturing this data to confirm that the device can be accurate despite a patient ingesting these items.
Data unblinded May 1, 2018 or at completion of season, which ever comes first.
Average Baseline
Time Frame: Data unblinded May 1, 2018 or at completion of season, which ever comes first.
The goal is to eliminate the need for requiring a baseline scan on a patient in order to decide if they have a concussion or not. By scanning a large number of normal volunteers at various ages, sex, race, etc, we expect to see trends based on these factors.
Data unblinded May 1, 2018 or at completion of season, which ever comes first.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Blinktbi, Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Dena Garner, Ph.D., The Citadel

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 17, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 17, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 13, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 18, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 22, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 19, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 17, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1415-14d

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

All patient data will be anonymized prior to dissemination. Contact the sponsor for further details.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Protocol and ICF are available any time.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Case by case basis.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings