Hearing Loss in Older Adults Study
Hearing Loss in Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Immediate Versus Delayed Cochlear Implantation.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Arizona
-
Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85718
- Arizona Center for Neurosciences
-
-
California
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90057
- House Ear Institute
-
-
Missouri
-
Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63112
- Washington University
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10029
- New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai
-
-
North Carolina
-
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599
- University of North Carolina Chapel Hill
-
-
Ohio
-
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45219
- University of Cincinnati Health
-
Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43212
- Ohio State University
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53226
- Medical College of Wisconsin
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Community-dwelling
- Proficient in English
- Oral communicator
- PTA (500, 1000 & 2000 Hz) ≥ 70 dB HL hearing loss duration ≥1 and no more than 30 years
- Active daily hearing aid users
- HHIE-S score greater than or equal to 24
- MoCA score greater than or equal to 20
- Post-linguistic onset sensorineural hearing loss and meet applicable FDA and/or Medicare candidacy criteria for cochlear implantation
- Willing to consent for the study, to be randomized to either group, to utilize bimodal hearing for the duration of the trial (if clinically appropriate), and follow the study protocol
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prelingual or perilingual severe-to-profound hearing loss
- Previous cochlear implantation in either ear
- Hearing loss of neural or central origin
- Permanent conductive hearing impairment (e.g. otosclerosis)
- Medical, audiological, or psychological conductions that might contraindicate participation in the clinical investigation
- Self reported disability in 2 or more activities of daily living
- Vision impairment worse than 20/40 on a near vision card
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Group A (Immediate Cochlear Implantation)
Group A will consist of 30 individuals who are candidates for cochlear implantation.
They will be unilaterally implanted immediately after initial study testing has been completed and then be followed for 12 months after device activation.
|
Unilateral implantation with a commercially approved Nucleus cochlear implant
|
|
Active Comparator: Group B (Delayed Cochlear Implantation)
Group B will consist of 30 individuals who are candidates for cochlear implantation.
They will continue to wear hearing aids after enrolling in the study and then be unilaterally implanted 6 months after enrollment and followed for 6 more months after device activation.
|
Unilateral implantation with a commercially approved Nucleus cochlear implant
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Hearing Handicap
Time Frame: 6 months after enrollment
|
The SSQ-12 is comprised of 12 items using the response format on a scale from 0 to 10, were 0 equals no ability and 10 equals perfect ability. These are divided into three sub-scales and the questions 1-5 are from the speech sub-scale, 6-8 from the spatial, and 9-12 from the qualities sub-scale. The three sub-scales are the average of the questions within. A 'not applicable' option is given for each item. Assessment of the impact of cochlear implantation versus continued hearing aid is then calculated and the theoretical score could vary between -10 to + 10. The higher the score the better benefit and positive score indicates improved hearing, a negative value an impaired hearing. |
6 months after enrollment
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: David N Cade, MD, MBA, Cochlear
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CLTD5693
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.