Using Decision Analysis to Enhance Decision-Making Regarding Prostate Cancer Screening
The purpose of this study is to evaluate a new counseling tool for patients deciding whether or not to undergo prostate cancer screening. This screening decision aid is a computer program that provides individual patients estimates of their risks of prostate cancer diagnosis, prostate cancer related death, or death from any cause. The researchers are evaluating whether or not patients find this screening decision aid helpful. As part of this study, participants will be asked for their response on questionnaires.
If patients find the screening decision aid helpful, the researchers will make it available at other clinic locations.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ohio
-
Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
- Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Life expectancy > 10 years
- Ability to read English
Exclusion Criteria:
- Personal history of prostate cancer
- Personal history of prostate biopsy or prostate surgery
- Prior prostate specific antigen screening in the past year leading up to their scheduled clinic visit
- Cognitive impairment
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Prostate Cancer Decision Aid
The research intervention will be exposure to the screening decision aid.
Patients will receive standardized counseling including population based risks and benefits of prostate cancer screening.
Then, patients will be given opportunity to review the screening decision aid prior to offering a decision on whether or not to undergo prostate cancer screening.
The patient decision aid will be a computer application that generates predicted risks associated with prostate cancer.
|
Patients will undergo standardized counseling and individualized counseling with the screening decision aid.
The screening decision aid is a computer program that provides individual patients estimates of their risks of prostate cancer diagnosis, prostate cancer related death, or death from any cause
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of initial interviews completed in 60 minutes
Time Frame: 60 minutes from beginning of interview
|
To be considered feasible in a busy clinical setting, researchers anticipate 80% of the initial interviews to be completed within the allotted 60-minute interview time.
|
60 minutes from beginning of interview
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Health Literacy
Time Frame: 1 month after clinical visit
|
Five item scale measuring attitudes towards screening
|
1 month after clinical visit
|
|
Patient decisional control preferences
Time Frame: 1 month after clinical visit
|
4 item scale where lower scores indicate more positive outcomes from screening
|
1 month after clinical visit
|
|
Decisional conflict Scale
Time Frame: 1 month after clinical visit
|
16 item scale ranging in a score from 0-4 where higher scores indicate more disagreement
|
1 month after clinical visit
|
|
Multidimensional measure of informed choice
Time Frame: 1 month after clinical visit
|
10 item true/false scale
|
1 month after clinical visit
|
|
Decisional regret scale
Time Frame: 1 month after clinical visit
|
5 item questionnaire using 5 point Likert scales where higher scores indicate more disagreement
|
1 month after clinical visit
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Michael A Brooks, MD, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CASE7817
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.