Endocrown and 90° Shoulder Endocrown
Comparison of Long Term Clinical Efficacy of Different Computer-Aided Design & Computer-Aided Manufacturing(CAD/CAM) Materials for the Restoration of Teeth With Root Canal Therapy With Endocrown or 90° Shoulder Endocrown
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Guangdong
-
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510515
- Recruiting
- Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18-60 year old patients with healthy body, the tooth is molar, root tip no obvious damage, no root fracture by X-ray;
- after complete root canal therapy, the remaining 4 wall intact tooth tissue;
- after complete root canal therapy, the remaining 3 wall intact tooth tissue;
- have good oral hygiene habits;
- agreed to participate in the trial and signed the informed consent form;
- patients who are not participating in other clinical trials;
- after completion of the repair, compliance with the USPHS evaluation criteria of marginal density class A cases
Exclusion Criteria:
- obvious destruction of the apical tissue and large cysts;
- severe periodontitis patients;
- oral malignant tumor patients;
- radiotherapy patients;
- pregnant women;
- patients with mental illness or systemic diseases;
- people who can not take care of themselves;
- the researchers believe that is not suitable for the test.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: endocrown restoration
a cervical margin in the form of a butt joint and a preparation of the pulp chamber that does not extend into the root canals.
|
a cervical margin in the form of a butt joint and a preparation of the pulp chamber that does not extend into the root canals.
|
|
Active Comparator: 90° shoulder endocrown restoration
a 90°cervical margin in the form of a butt joint and a preparation of the pulp chamber that does not extend into the root canals.
|
a 90°cervical margin in the form of a butt joint and a preparation of the pulp chamber that does not extend into the root canals.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
USPHS criteria for dental restorations assessment
Time Frame: 2 Years
|
This criteria is composed of three dimensions (biological, functional and esthetic), each consisting of several items that are assessed by clinical and radiographic examination.
Some items are evaluated quantitatively, others visually.The score of all items is retained as the overall score of the restoration.
|
2 Years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Marginal Adaptation
Time Frame: 2 Years
|
Clinical reevaluations were so far performed at baseline and 24 months after insertion according to modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria by 2 independent evaluators.
A: Crown margin not discernible; probe does not catch; B: Probe catches on crown margin but no gap; gap or chipping on probing, with enamel exposed but polishable; C: Gap or chipping, with dentin or liner exposed ; D: Partial fracture, fracture, luxation.
|
2 Years
|
|
Marginal discoloration
Time Frame: 2 Years
|
Clinical reevaluations were so far performed at baseline and 24 months after insertion according to modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria by 2 independent evaluators.
A: No discoloration on the margin between the restoration and the tooth structure; B: Superficial discoloration on the margin between the restoration and the tooth structure; does not penetrate in pulpal direction; C: Discoloration has penetrated along the margin of the restorative material in pulpal direction.
|
2 Years
|
|
Integrity of restoration
Time Frame: 2 Years
|
Clinical reevaluations were so far performed at baseline and 24 months after insertion according to modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria by 2 independent evaluators.
A: Intact; B: Crack apparent on transillumination; C: Fracture observable; D: Crown lost(state at which interface debond occurred).
|
2 Years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: BuLing Wu, PHD, Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- NFEC-2017-141
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.