Dose-Response Relationship of Ambulatory Load and Cartilage - Pilot Study (COMP)

September 17, 2019 updated by: University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

The research question is if there is a dose-response relationship between blood biomarkers for articular cartilage and the magnitude of physiological load. To investigate this load induced biomarker change, the participants will complete a 30-minute walking test under three loading conditions: A: 80%, B: 100% C: 120% of their respective bodyweight (Fig. 1).

The main biomarker we are interested in is called cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP). Serum COMP levels are increased immediately after 30-min running but there is no dose-response relationship shown yet.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The current state of research in the field and of our own research clearly shows that the in vivo mechanobiology of articular cartilage is poorly understood. Previous results of changes in cartilage biomarker concentrations after ambulatory exercise raise the following question:

Do load-induced changes in blood biomarkers for articular cartilage (COMP) depend on the physiological load magnitude? To generate initial data for answering this question, we will establish the experimental framework to systematically study the in vivo mechanobiology of human articular cartilage to address the following aims.

  • To obtain pilot data for investigating the in vivo dose-response relationship of weight-bearing and blood levels of mechanosensitive biomarker of articular cartilage using controlled load- bearing as experimental paradigm.
  • To provide pilot data for comparing ambulatory biomechanics between the controlled load- bearing conditions.

The experimental setting consists of a 30-minutes walking stress test under three loading conditions: A: 80 %, B: 100% and C: 120% bodyweight. Unloading will be achieved through an unloading system and additional loading with an adjustable weight vest. Before and after the walking stress test, venous blood samples will be taken at five time points. The biomarker concentration is measured with a commercial available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Hypothesis Our working hypothesis is that there is a dose-response relationship between the temporarily increased or decreased load and the load-induced change in COMP level in the blood serum. We assume that serum COMP concentration increases with increasing accumulated load on the knee cartilage simulated through the three different loading conditions.

Design The design of the pilot study is a controlled multimodal data collection (biological, biomechanical) with block randomization. Specifically, we will collect blood samples and biomechanical (kinematic and pressure) data. We will determine the relationship between the serum blood concentration and the biomechanical data.

Because this is a cross-over study, all participants will perform the same three walking stress tests but in random order. Each participant of the study will be tested for 2.5 hours on 3 separate days.

Method In this experiment, we will test 24 healthy participants (12 male, 12 female) on 3 test days under three different loading conditions in a randomized block design. On each test day, participants will complete walking stress test for 30-minutes with A: 80%, B: 100% and C: 120% of their bodyweight. Through the modified bodyweight we generate higher or lower forces on the knee cartilage, which should affect the COMP concentration in the blood serum.

To measure the change in serum COMP concentration, blood samples will be taken at five time points before and after the walking stress test. The blood samples are taken by a study nurse. For the venipuncture, a thin, sterile, disposable vein catheter is placed in the antecubital vein. The catheter stays in the vein for the entire 2.5 hours of the experiment. Blood samples will be collected and allowed to clot for 30-minutes. Serum will be separated and frozen in aliquots to -20°C within 1 hour of collection and then transferred for storage at -80°C until assayed. Serum biomarker concentrations will be determined using commercial ELISAs.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
24

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Switzerland
    • Basel Stadt
      • Basel, Basel Stadt, Switzerland, 4031
        • University Hospital Basel

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 30 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 18 and 30 years
  • being physically active (> 2/week)
  • body mass index (BMI) <30 kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • previous knee injury
  • neuromuscular condition affecting gait

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
No Intervention: Normal load
Healthy subjects walking for 30 minutes on a treadmill with normal body weight
Experimental: Increased load
Healthy subjects walking for 30 minutes on a treadmill with 20% additional body weight
Other: Increased load
Participants walk with 120% body weight achieved with a weight vest
Experimental: Reduced load
Healthy subjects walking for 30 minutes on a treadmill with 20% lower body weight
Other: Reduced load
Participants walk with 80% body weight achieved by a dynamic unloading system

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Load-induced serum Cartilage Oligomeric Matrix Protein concentration
Time Frame: 3 hours
Change in serum concentration during 30-minute walking exercise determined by commercial ELISA 30 min before to 2 hours after 30-minute walking exercise
3 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall ground reaction force impulse
Time Frame: 30 minutes
Area under the ground reaction curve multiplied by number of steps taken during 30-minute walking exercise
30 minutes
Dynamic range of motion lower extremity joints
Time Frame: 30 minutes
Min to max joint angles (ankle, knee, hip) measured using RehaGait (inertial measurement units)
30 minutes

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Age
Time Frame: At enrollment
Age in years
At enrollment
Sex
Time Frame: At enrollment
male or female
At enrollment
Body mass index
Time Frame: At enrollment
BMI in kg/m2
At enrollment
Knee function
Time Frame: At enrollment
Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score measured by questionnaire (best score: 100 - no limitations; worst score: 0)
At enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of Erlangen-Nürnberg

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Annegret Muendermann, PhD, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 5, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 30, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 27, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 27, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 6, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 18, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 17, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2017-01006

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on Increased load

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings