An Observational Study to Evaluate AZD9291 Treatment in Patients With T790M Positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

December 17, 2020 updated by: AstraZeneca

An Observational Study to Evaluate AZD9291 Treatment in Patients With EGFR T790M Positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Following Progression on at Least One Prior EGFR TKI Treatment

AZD9291 Early Access Program (EAP) was available in Taiwan during October 2015 to September 2016, a time period before the approval of AZD9291, to supply the unlicensed AZD9291 for the NSCLC patients who received at least one prior EGFR TKI therapy. At the end of September 2016, more than 450 patients have been under AZD9291 treatment through the EAP. This observational study aims to evaluate the clinical benefit of AZD9291 treatment for these patients who were in the EAP

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

AZD9291 Early Access Program (EAP) was available in Taiwan during October 2015 to September 2016, a time period before the approval of AZD9291, to supply the unlicensed AZD9291 for the NSCLC patients who received at least one prior EGFR TKI therapy. At the end of September 2016, more than 450 patients have been under AZD9291 treatment through the EAP. This observational study aims to evaluate the clinical benefit of AZD9291 treatment for these patients who were in the EAP

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
423

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Taiwan
      • Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 807
        • Research Site
      • Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 83301
        • Research Site
      • Taichung, Taiwan, 40705
        • Research Site
      • Tainan City, Taiwan, 70403
        • Research Site
      • Tainan City, Taiwan, 73657
        • Research Site
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 10002
        • Research Site
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 112
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

All the available patients who have participated in the AZD9291 EAP will be screened for the eligible criteria for data collection in this observational study

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least 20 years of age
  • Patients who were in the AZD9291 Early Access Program
  • Received at least one dose of AZD9291 treatment as mono-therapy, supported by available source documents
  • Patient who discontinued the single use of AZD9291, had disease progression, or died under AZD9291 treatment, whichever comes last, during the period from October 01, 2015 to December 31, 2018
  • Patients agree to provide the written informed consent or the informed consent is waived by IRB.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients who did not receive at least one dose of EGFR TKI for the treatment of EGFR mutation (+) NSCLC

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression free survival (PFS)
Time Frame: Every 12 weeks until treatment discontinuation as defined by RECIST 1.1 projected 12 months
PFS is defined as the time interval (in months) from the first dose of AZD9291 in the EAP to the date of disease progression
Every 12 weeks until treatment discontinuation as defined by RECIST 1.1 projected 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: Every 12 weeks until treatment discontinuation as defined by RECIST 1.1 projected 24 months
OS is defined as the time interval (in months) from the date of the first dose of AZD9291 in the EAP until the date of death due to any cause
Every 12 weeks until treatment discontinuation as defined by RECIST 1.1 projected 24 months

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Response Rate (RR)
Time Frame: Every 12 weeks until treatment discontinuation as defined by RECIST 1.1 projected 12 months
RR is defined as the percentage of subjects with the best overall response of 'responding', which is defined as complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), by investigator's assessment
Every 12 weeks until treatment discontinuation as defined by RECIST 1.1 projected 12 months
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Time Frame: Every 12 weeks until treatment discontinuation as defined by RECIST 1.1 projected 12 months
DCR is defined as the percentages of subjects who have the best overall response of CR, PR, or SD, which is determined by investigator's assessment.
Every 12 weeks until treatment discontinuation as defined by RECIST 1.1 projected 12 months
Time to treatment discontinuation (TTD)
Time Frame: Time from patient first dose to data cut off (up to 32 months)
TTD is defined as the time interval (in months) from the date of the first dose of AZD9291 in the EAP until the date of the single use of AZD9291 discontinuation for any reason
Time from patient first dose to data cut off (up to 32 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
AstraZeneca

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 21, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 1, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 1, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 7, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 21, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 17, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • D5160R00021

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings