SMART-DAPPER: Leveraging the Depression And Primary-care Partnership for Effectiveness-implementation Research Project (SMART-DAPPER)

November 18, 2025 updated by: University of California, San Francisco

A Sequential, Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) for Non-specialist Treatment of Common Mental Disorders in Kenya: Leveraging the Depression And Primary-care Partnership for Effectiveness-implementation Research (DAPPER) Project

Despite carrying the vast majority of the global mental disorder burden, 75% of adults with mental disorders in Low and Middle Income Countries have no access to services. This study will test strategies for integrating first and second line evidence-based depression and trauma-related disorder treatments with primary care services at a large public sector hospital and conduct robust cost and cost-benefit analyses of each treatment to produce a "menu" of cost-benefit options for personalized, integrated mental health care with corresponding effectiveness and implementation values.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Mental disorders are a leading cause of global disability, driven by depression and anxiety. Most of the disease burden is in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMICs), where 75% of adults with mental disorders have no service access. Despite nearly 15 years of efficacy research showing that local non-specialists can provide evidence-based care for depression and anxiety in LMICs, few studies have advanced to the critical next step: identifying strategies for sustainable "real world" non-specialist treatment including integration with existing healthcare platforms and response to common clinical dilemmas, such as what treatment to start with and how to modify it.

Given the need to personalize treatment to achieve remission (absence of disease) and the scarcity of mental health specialists in LMICs, successful reduction of population-level disability caused by depression and anxiety requires (1) evidence-based strategies for first-line and second-line (non-remitter) treatment delivered by non-specialists, with (2) confirmation of presumed mechanism of action and (3) patient-level moderators of treatment outcome to inform personalized, non-specialist treatment algorithms.

The research team has worked in western Kenya for 6 years with a UCSF-Kenya collaboration that supports integrated HIV services at over 70 primary healthcare facilities in Kisumu County (Family AIDS Care and Education Services [FACES]). Primary care populations in Kenya have high prevalence of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) (26%) and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) (35%). Kenyan leaders lack an evidence base for two essential treatments - psychotherapy and second generation antidepressants- without which scale-up will fall short of its potential. We conducted a randomized, controlled trial in Kisumu County of Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT) delivered by non-specialists for HIV-positive patients with MDD and PTSD. In our study, IPT achieved full remission of MDD and PTSD in the majority of participants.

Given the high prevalence of MDD-PTSD co-morbidity, we will collaborate with the FACES team providing services to Kisumu County Hospital (KCH) primary care outpatient clinic (~10,000 patients/month) to conduct a randomized trial of IPT versus fluoxetine for MDD and/or PTSD. Local non-specialists will be trained in mental health care for the SMART and hired through the Kenyan Ministry of Health to work at KCH. SMART participants will be randomized to: (1) first line treatment with IPT or fluoxetine; (2) second line treatment for non-remitters- treatment "switch" (e.g., IPT to fluoxetine) or treatment "combination" (e.g., addition of IPT to fluoxetine). Research with mental health specialists in high income countries suggests that antidepressants and psychotherapy have equivalent short-term efficacy and that psychotherapy yields superior long-term relapse prevention. We will test the role of previously identified mechanisms in mediating remission and key moderators of treatment effect. Results of moderator and Q learning analyses will produce first and second-line non-specialist treatment algorithms.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
2162

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Kenya
      • Kisumu, Kenya
        • Kisumu County Hospital
      • Kisumu, Kenya
        • Lumumba Health Center
      • Kisumu, Kenya
        • Jaramogi Oginga Odinga Teaching and Referral Hospital (JOOTRH)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Kisumu County Hospital (KCH) adult primary care outpatient clinic attendees who screen positive for depression and/or PTSD
  2. Ability to attend weekly IPT sessions/fluoxetine monitoring; (3) 18 years or older

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Cognitive dysfunction compromising ability to participate in IPT or accurately take fluoxetine (lack of orientation to person, place, time and situation)
  2. acute suicidality requiring higher level of care
  3. drug/alcohol use disorders requiring substance use treatment (AUDIT score of 8 or higher, DAST score of 3 or higher)
  4. history of mania or requiring treatment for hypomania
  5. Outside mental health treatment during the study treatment phases (any mental health treatment is allowed during follow-up phases and is recorded by study team).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Interpersonal psychotherapy
IPT was developed in the 1980s by Gerald Klerman and Myrna Weissman to address interpersonal issues in depression. IPT is now considered evidence-based, first-line treatment for depression. IPT improves symptoms by addressing problems in social relationships. IPT is traditionally delivered as weekly one-hour sessions over 12 weeks, focused on one interpersonal problem area.
Behavioral: Interpersonal Psychotherapy
IPT was developed in the 1980s by Gerald Klerman and Myrna Weissman to address interpersonal issues in depression. IPT is now considered evidence-based, first-line treatment for depression. IPT improves symptoms by addressing problems in social relationships. IPT is traditionally delivered as weekly one-hour sessions over 12 weeks, focused on one interpersonal problem area.
Other Names:
  • IPT
Active Comparator: fluoxetine
Fluoxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor that is FDA approved for the treatment of depression. Compared to placebo, fluoxetine is more likely to produce symptom response for MDD. Despite the interim development of many other antidepressants since the development of fluoxetine, it remains a first line treatment for depression.
Drug: Fluoxetine
Fluoxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor that is FDA approved for the treatment of depression. Compared to placebo, fluoxetine is more likely to produce symptom response for MDD. Despite the interim development of many other antidepressants since the development of fluoxetine, it remains a first line treatment for depression.
Active Comparator: Fluoxetine after IPT
participants who do not remit from MDD and PTSD after treatment with IPT may be randomized to fluoxetine.
Drug: Fluoxetine
Fluoxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor that is FDA approved for the treatment of depression. Compared to placebo, fluoxetine is more likely to produce symptom response for MDD. Despite the interim development of many other antidepressants since the development of fluoxetine, it remains a first line treatment for depression.
Active Comparator: IPT after fluoxetine
participants who do not remit from MDD and PTSD after treatment with fluoxetine may be randomized to IPT.
Behavioral: Interpersonal Psychotherapy
IPT was developed in the 1980s by Gerald Klerman and Myrna Weissman to address interpersonal issues in depression. IPT is now considered evidence-based, first-line treatment for depression. IPT improves symptoms by addressing problems in social relationships. IPT is traditionally delivered as weekly one-hour sessions over 12 weeks, focused on one interpersonal problem area.
Other Names:
  • IPT
Active Comparator: IPT + fluoxetine
participants who do not remit from MDD and PTSD after treatment with fluoxetine may be randomized to IPT + fluoxetine.
Drug: Fluoxetine
Fluoxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor that is FDA approved for the treatment of depression. Compared to placebo, fluoxetine is more likely to produce symptom response for MDD. Despite the interim development of many other antidepressants since the development of fluoxetine, it remains a first line treatment for depression.
Behavioral: Interpersonal Psychotherapy
IPT was developed in the 1980s by Gerald Klerman and Myrna Weissman to address interpersonal issues in depression. IPT is now considered evidence-based, first-line treatment for depression. IPT improves symptoms by addressing problems in social relationships. IPT is traditionally delivered as weekly one-hour sessions over 12 weeks, focused on one interpersonal problem area.
Other Names:
  • IPT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Major Depression at End of Treatment
Time Frame: End of 1st line Treatment (up to month 6) and end of 2nd line Treatment (up to month 12)
Number of Participants with Major Depression. The Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II) was used and a score of 19 or greater was defined as positive for major depression. BDI-II score below 19 is defined as negative for major depression. Scores range from 0 to 63 with higher total scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms.
End of 1st line Treatment (up to month 6) and end of 2nd line Treatment (up to month 12)
Number of Participants With PTSD
Time Frame: End of 1st line Treatment (up to month 6) and end of 2nd line Treatment (up to month 12)
Number of Participants with PTSD. The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) was used and score of 23 or greater is defined as positive for PTSD. PCL-5 score below 23 is defined as negative for PTSD. Score range from 0 to 80 with higher total scores indicating more severe PTSD symptoms.
End of 1st line Treatment (up to month 6) and end of 2nd line Treatment (up to month 12)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of California, San Francisco

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
University of California, San Diego
University of Nairobi
Makerere University
Kenya Medical Research Institute

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Muthoni J Mathai, MDChB, MMed, University of Nairobi
  • Principal Investigator: Susan M Meffert, MD, MPH, University of California, San Francisco

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 31, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 6, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 6, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 2, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 8, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 15, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 2, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 18, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1R01MH115512 1R01MH113722-01A1
  • 1R01MH115512 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • 1R01MH113722-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

NIMH Data Archive The National Institutes of Health (NIH) and NIMH have developed a federation of data repositories called the NIMH Data Archive (NDA) to store the collection of data from participants in research studies related to mental health, regardless of the source of funding. The extensive information collected by these studies, and subsequently stored in the National Database for Autism Research (NDAR), the NIH Pediatric MRI Repository (PedsMRI), the National Database for Clinical Trials Related to Mental Illness (NDCT), and the Research Domain Criteria Database (RDoCdb) provides a rare and valuable scientific resource. The NIH and the NIMH seek to encourage the use of these resources to achieve rapid scientific progress. In order to take full advantage of such resources and maximize their research value, it is important that data be made available, on appropriate terms and conditions, to the largest possible number of qualified investigators in a timely manner.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be made available to the NIMH data archive as soon as it is verified as clean and complete, with at least annual updates throughout the duration of the study. Data will be be available indefinitely or for as long as the NIMH repositories supports the electronic data storage.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The investigative team and our NIMH and GACD partners will review requests for data. Evaluation will include scientific merit of the proposal, overlap versus building upon the study goals.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Trauma

Clinical Trials on Fluoxetine

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings