High-intensity Rosuvastatin and Moderate-intensity Rosuvastatin/Ezetimibe in ASCVD Patients

December 27, 2019 updated by: Yuhan Corporation

A Randomized, Open, Parallel, Multicenter, Phase 4 Study to Compare High-intensity Rosuvastatin to Moderate-intensity Rosuvastatin/Ezetimibe in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) Patients

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of high-intensity rosuvastatin and moderate-intensity rosuvastatin/ezetimibe in ASCVD patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
270

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Korea, Republic of
      • Seongnam, Korea, Republic of
        • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Aged 19 to 75 years

  2. Patients diagnosed with ASCVD (coronary artery disease)

    • acute coronary syndrome
    • history of myocardial infarction (MI)
    • stable or unstable angina
    • history of coronary revascularization
    • stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA)
    • peripheral arterial disease, history of peripheral arterial revascularization
  3. Taking a stable dose of a statin or a lipid-lowering agent of ezetimibe over 4 weeks before randomization
  4. Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Administration of other lipid lowering agents than statin or ezetimibe within 3 months prior to screening visit
  2. Fasting triglyceride ≥ 400 mg/dL
  3. History of muscular disease or rhabdomyolysis due to use of statin
  4. Hypersensitive to rosuvastatin or ezetemibe

  5. Contraindications stated in the SPC of rosuvastatin or rosuvastatin/ezetimibe including the following:

    ① Severe renal disease (CrCL < 30mL/min: Cockcroft-gault formula or estimated GFR (MDRD) < 30mL/min/1.73m2)

    ② ALT, AST > 3x ULN or history of active liver disease

    ③ CPK > 3x ULN

  6. Administration of other investigational products within 30 days prior to screening visit
  7. Other than the above who is deemed to be ineligible to participate in the trial by investigator

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Rosuvamibe Tab
Rosuvastatin 10mg/Ezetimibe 10mg qd for 24 weeks
Drug: Rosuvamibe
Rosuvastatin 10mg/Ezetimibe 10mg
Active Comparator: Monorova Tab
Rosuvastatin 20mg qd for 24 weeks
Drug: Monorova
Rosuvastatin 20mg

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change from baseline to week 12 in LDL-C level
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
Baseline, Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change from baseline to week 12 and week 24 in total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglycerides (TG), Non-HDL cholesterol, Apolipoprotein A1, and Apolipoprotein B
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24
Baseline, Week 12, Week 24
Change from baseline to week 12 and week 24 in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24
Baseline, Week 12, Week 24
Change from baseline to week 12 and week 24 in fasting plasma glucose (FPG)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24
Baseline, Week 12, Week 24
Change from baseline to week 12 and week 24 in homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24
Baseline, Week 12, Week 24
Proportion of subjects achieving LDL-C < 70mg/dL
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24
Baseline, Week 12, Week 24
Occurrence of Statin-Associated Muscle Symptoms (SAMS)
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Up to 24 weeks
Proportion of subjects with CPK 4 x upper limit of normal (ULN) or 10 x ULN
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24
Baseline, Week 12, Week 24
Proportion of subjects with AST or ALT levels elevated to 4 x ULN or 10 x ULN
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24
Baseline, Week 12, Week 24
Occurrence of MACCE (Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Event)
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Up to 24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Yuhan Corporation

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 18, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 26, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 26, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 2, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 9, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 11, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 30, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 27, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • YMC033

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on ASCVD

Clinical Trials on Rosuvamibe

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings