Hyperuricemia and Left Ventricular Diastolic Function

April 11, 2018 updated by: Cheng-Wei Liu, National Defense Medical Center, Taiwan

Associations and Plausibility Among Left Ventricle Diastolic Function, Serum Uric Acid and Inflammatory Biomarkers in Individuals With Cardiometabolic Risks - A Prospective Observational Study

Metabolic syndrome and hyperuricemia were both associated with inflammation, leading to diversities of cardiovascular disease such as left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, but the relationship among these entities remained unclear. The aim of the present study focuses on the association among hyperuricemia, diastolic dysfunction and inflammatory biomarkers in apparently healthy individuals with metabolic syndrome

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Apparently healthy individuals with metabolic syndrome were prospectively and consecutively enrolled since August 2017. Blood samples were obtained after participants are fasting for at least 12 hours, including serum uric acid, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, high-sensitivity interleukin-6, tumor necrotizing factor alpha, fasting glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, insulin, lipid profile, creatinine, alanine aminotransferase, sodium, potassium, and calcium. All echocardiographic parameters were measured in accordance with the American Society of Echocardiography guidelines.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
67

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Taiwan
    • Songshan Dist.
      • Taipei, Songshan Dist., Taiwan, 105
        • Tri-Service General Hospital, Songshan Branch

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Apparently healthy individuals with metabolic syndrome

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age between 20 to 75 years
  2. Metabolic syndrome

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Left ventricular ejection fraction <40%
  2. Severe valvular heart disease
  3. Significant structure heart diseases such as hypertrophic, dilated, infiltrative or restrictive cardiomyopathy, or congenital heart disease
  4. Persistent or chronic atrial fibrillation
  5. Status post cardiac surgery, including coronary artery bypass surgery of valve intervention
  6. Status post intra-cardiac device implantation
  7. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  8. Severe anemia
  9. An obvious systemic disease that interferes left ventricular diastolic dysfunction such as acute coronary syndrome

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Normouricemia
Serum uric of 7mg/dl or less in men or 6mg/dl or less in women
Diagnostic test: hyperuricemia
serum uric acid of 7mg/dl or more in men or 6mg/dl or more in women
Hyperuricemia
Serum uric of 7mg/dl or more in men or 6mg/dl or more in women
Diagnostic test: hyperuricemia
serum uric acid of 7mg/dl or more in men or 6mg/dl or more in women

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Left ventricle diastolic dysfunction with elevated left atrial pressure
Time Frame: 1 day
The contemporary definition of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction with elevated left atrial pressure is mainly >50% positive of the following criteria: (1) average E/e' ≥14 (2) left atrial volume index >34 ml/m2 (3) tricuspid regurgitation velocity >2.8 m/s
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
high-sensitivity C-reactive protein
Time Frame: 1 week
determined by Latex enhanced immunoturbidimetric，ADVIA 1800，ADVIA Chemistry XPT，Dimension RXL，SIEMENS，AU 640，Beckman Coulter
1 week
high-sensitivity interleukin-6
Time Frame: 1 month
determined by elisa enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, R & D system
1 month
tumor necrotizing factor alpha
Time Frame: 1 month
determined by elisa enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
National Defense Medical Center, Taiwan

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Cheng-Wei Liu, M.D., Tri-service General hospital, Songshan branch, National defense medical center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 15, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 3, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 3, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 11, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 12, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 12, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 11, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2-106-05-078

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metabolic Syndrome

Clinical Trials on hyperuricemia

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings