Effects of tDCS on Impulsiveness Among People Suffering From Borderline Personality Disorder (TIMBER)

March 6, 2019 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon

Effet de la tDCS Sur l'impulsivité Chez Les Personnes Souffrant d'un Trouble Borderline : TIMBER

The study aims to evaluate the impact of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on impulsiveness of adults suffering from Borderline Personality Disorder. Short- and long-term effects are assessed by electroencephalography (EEG) records, experimental tasks and self-rated scales.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Impulsivity, considered as the tendency to express spontaneous, excessive and/or unplanned behavior, is recognized as a major factor involved in suicidal behavior and self-harm behaviors. It consists in one of the diagnostic criteria of Borderline Personality Disorder, allowing as well assessment of its clinical severity. There is so far no specific treatment concerning impulsivity. From a neurobiological perspective, the prefrontal cortex is considered as a critical region in the cognitive control of behaviors. Previous studies have associated an hypoactivation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) and the dorsal part of the anterior cingulate cortex to Borderline Personality Disorder.

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a technique of noninvasive brain stimulation which delivers a subthreshold electrical current to the scalp, manipulating the resting membrane potential. It has shown cognitive function improvement, both in healthy individuals and psychiatric populations. Modulation of the dlPFC could therefore represent a mean of reducing impulsivity in those patients.

With a prospective, sham-controlled, crossover, double-blind design, this study aims to evaluate the impact of bilateral tDCS over the dlPFC on the impulsive dimension of adults suffering from Borderline Personality Disorder. Subjects will be submitted to 10 tDCS stimulation sessions (active or sham) for five consecutive days (2 sessions of 30 minutes/day). Current intensity will be of 2 mA, through 25 cm² surface electrodes, placed over the dlPFC (anode position over F4 and cathode over F3, according to the EEG 10-20 international system). Subjects who undergo active stimulation sessions will be then submitted to sham sessions and vice-versa. Baseline measures will be compared to those obtained immediately after the end of sessions (5 days: short-term effects), and to 12 and 30 days later (long-term effects). Active and sham stimulation sessions outcomes will as well be compared.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Nancy, France
        • Pôle Hospitalo-Universitaire de Psychiatrie du Grand Nancy
      • Rouffach, France
        • Centre Hospitalier Specialisé de Rouffach
    • Franche-Comte
      • Besancon, Franche-Comte, France, 25000
        • CHU Besançon

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 96 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Man or woman older than 18 years old
  • Right-handed
  • Signed Informed Consent form
  • Subject affiliated to or beneficiary from a French social security regime
  • Inpatient or outpatient at the Adult Psychiatry Service
  • Diagnosis of Borderline Personality Disorder according to the 5th edition of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) criteria and confirmation by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders (SCID-II)
  • Absence of addictive comorbidities (except: tobacco, tea, coffee)
  • Absence of severe progressive neurologic and/or somatic pathologies (specially tumors, degenerative diseases)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Younger than 18 years old
  • Left-handed
  • Subject under measure of protection or guardianship of justice
  • Presence of psychiatric comorbidities (chronic psychosis, Bipolar Disorder)
  • Subject beneficiary from a legal protection regime
  • Subject unlikely to cooperate or low cooperation stated by investigator
  • Subject not covered by social security
  • Pregnant woman
  • Subject being in the exclusion period of another study or provided for by the "National Volunteer File"

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Group 1
Subjects suffering from Borderline Personality Disorder randomly assigned to start the trial by 10 active tDCS sessions, followed by 10 sham tDCS sessions
Device: Active tDCS
10 active tDCS sessions (2 sessions/day for 5 days, 30 min each, 2 mA) applied to the dlPFC
Other Names:
  • Starstim® (Neuroelectrics, Spain)
Device: Sham tDCS
10 sham tDCS sessions (2 sessions/day for 5 days, 30 min each, 0 mA) applied to the dlPFC
Other Names:
  • Starstim® (Neuroelectrics, Spain)
Experimental: Group 2
Subjects suffering from Borderline Personality Disorder randomly assigned to start the trial by 10 sham tDCS sessions, followed by 10 active tDCS sessions
Device: Active tDCS
10 active tDCS sessions (2 sessions/day for 5 days, 30 min each, 2 mA) applied to the dlPFC
Other Names:
  • Starstim® (Neuroelectrics, Spain)
Device: Sham tDCS
10 sham tDCS sessions (2 sessions/day for 5 days, 30 min each, 0 mA) applied to the dlPFC
Other Names:
  • Starstim® (Neuroelectrics, Spain)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
EPs during BART
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 5, Day 12 and Day 30 post-tDCS
Amplitude variation of evoked potentials (EPs) detected by electroencephalography (EEG) during the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART), assessing risk-taking behavior. Variation will be obtained by comparing records before beginning of stimulation sessions with 5, 12 and 30 days after active and/or sham tDCS.
Baseline (Day 0), Day 5, Day 12 and Day 30 post-tDCS

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
BIS-10 scores
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 5, Day 12 and Day 30 post-tDCS
Compared scores from the French version of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-10). The French version of the BIS-10 is a self-rated 34 item questionnaire, composed by three subscales: motor-impulsivity, cognitive-impulsivity and non-planning-impulsivity. Each item is scored on a 0 to 4 points scale. Higher scores indicate higher levels of impulsivity.
Baseline (Day 0), Day 5, Day 12 and Day 30 post-tDCS
HDRS scores
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 5, Day 12 and Day 30 post-tDCS
Compared scores from the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). The HDRS is a clinician-rated 17 item scale which allows depression severity assessment and follow-up. Each item is scored on a 3 or 5 point scale. Scores are represented as follows: 0-7 Normal, 8-13 Mild Depression, 14-18 Moderate Depression, 19-22 Severe Depression, ≥23 Very Severe Depression.
Baseline (Day 0), Day 5, Day 12 and Day 30 post-tDCS
UPPS-P scores
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 5, Day 12 and Day 30 post-tDCS
Compared scores from the Urgency, Premeditation (lack of), Perseverance (lack of), Sensation Seeking, Positive Urgency Impulsive Behavior Scale (UPPS-P). The French version of the UPPS-P is a self-rated 45 item scale, evaluating the following components: urgency, lack of premeditation, lack of perseverance and sensation seeking. Each item is scored on a base of 4 points. Higher scores indicate higher levels of impulsivity.
Baseline (Day 0), Day 5, Day 12 and Day 30 post-tDCS
MADRS scores
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 5, Day 12 and Day 30 post-tDCS
Compared scores from the Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). The MADRS is clinician-rated 10 item scale, scored in a base of 6 points per item. Cutoff points are: 0-6 Asymptomatic, 7-19 Mild Depression, 20-34 Moderate Depression and >34 Severe Depression.
Baseline (Day 0), Day 5, Day 12 and Day 30 post-tDCS
C-SSRS scores
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 5, Day 12 and Day 30 post-tDCS
Compared scores from the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). The C-SSRS is a clinician-rated tool that evaluates suicidal ideation and behavior. It is composed by 6 "yes/no" questions. High suicide risk is indicated when "yes" is answered to questions 4, 5 or 6.
Baseline (Day 0), Day 5, Day 12 and Day 30 post-tDCS
Go/No-Go task
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 5, Day 12 and Day 30 post-tDCS
Compared results from the experimental Go/No-Go task, assessing response inhibition.
Baseline (Day 0), Day 5, Day 12 and Day 30 post-tDCS
Stroop task
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 5, Day 12 and Day 30 post-tDCS
Compared results from the experimental Stroop task, assessing response inhibition.
Baseline (Day 0), Day 5, Day 12 and Day 30 post-tDCS

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Djamila BENNABI, MD PhD, CENTRE HOSPITALIER UNIVERSITAIRE de BESANCON

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 9, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 9, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 17, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 7, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 6, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • P/2017/319

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Impulsive Behavior

Clinical Trials on Active tDCS

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings