Effect of Anatomy of Major Duodenal Papilla on the Difficulty of Cannulation During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography

December 24, 2019 updated by: Yanglin Pan, Air Force Military Medical University, China

Effect of Anatomy of Major Duodenal Papilla on the Difficulty of Cannulation During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)

Selective cannulation is an essential step for the success of ERCP. The successful cannulation is influenced by types of disease (such as Sphincter of Oddi Dysfunction and duodenal stricture), the experience of endoscopists and the anatomy of papilla. It is suggested that the size, morphology, orientation and location of major duodenal papilla (MDP), could cause a difficult cannulation (Endoscopy 2016; 48: 657-683). However, the related evidences are limited. The investigators hypothesized that special anatomy of papilla, such as a lanky shape (defined by the higher ratio of length to width) and a deeper location, could increase the difficulty of cannulation. Here the investigators investigated the effects of the anatomy of major duodenal papilla on post-ERCP pancreatitis and the procedure of cannulation in patients undergoing ERCP.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
658

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
      • Chongqing, China, 400010
        • Department of gastroenterology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
    • Fujian
      • Xiamen, Fujian, China, 361001
        • Department of gastroenterology, Successful Hospital of Xiamen university
    • Henan
      • Kaifeng, Henan, China, 475000
        • Huaihe Hospital of Henan University
    • Shaanxi
      • Xi'an, Shaanxi, China, 710032
        • Endoscopic center, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with native papilla who underwent ERCP

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age 18-80
  • Patients with native papilla who underwent ERCP

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior endoscopic sphincterotomy
  • Minor pancreatic duct as the targeted duct
  • History of prior upper gastrointestinal surgery, such as Billroth I, II and Roux-en-Y
  • Fistula of MDP
  • Papillary carcinoma or adenoma
  • Duodenal obstruction, type II
  • Prior stent placement in common bile duct or pancreatic duct
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Unwilling or inability to provide consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
MDP
ERCP was performed by trainees or trainers. Before the cannulation, the photo of major duodenal papilla will be taken carefully to evaluate its size, morphology, orientation and location. All patients initially received wire-guided cannulation with a sphincterotome, If cannulation failed, precut sphincterotomy or the double-wire technique was performed when appropriate. Therapeutic manipulation (eg, sphincterotomy, balloon dilation, stone extraction, and stenting) was done when appropriate. Pancreatic duct stent placement was performed at the discretion of the endoscopists.
Other: MDP
evaluate the anatomy of each major duodenal papilla before selective cannulation during ERCP

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
post-ERCP pancreatitis incidence
Time Frame: 48 hours
frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis
48 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of difficult cannulation
Time Frame: 3 hours
difficult cannulation was defined as when total cannulation time was more than 5minutes, total cannulation attempts more than 5 times or inadvertent pancreatic duct cannulation more than 1 time.
3 hours
Cannulation attempts
Time Frame: 3 hours
the sphincterotome touching the papilla for at least 5 seconds will be considered as one attempt.
3 hours
Total cannulation time
Time Frame: 3 hours
the time from the moment the sphincterotome touch the papilla to the guide wire advance into the target duct.
3 hours
Unintended pancreatic duct cannulation
Time Frame: 3 hours
the guide wire unintentionally entered into the undesired pancreatic duct
3 hours
Complication rate
Time Frame: 48 hours
frequency of any adverse outcome that required hospital admission or prolonged hospital stay necessary for management of the complication, including pancreatitis, bleeding, biliary infection or perforation.
48 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Air Force Military Medical University, China

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Huaihe Hospital of Henan University
Successful Hospital of Xiamen university

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 7, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 20, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 16, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 7, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 8, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 26, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 24, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • KY20180081-2

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings