Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Screen in Norway: A Validation Study

October 28, 2024 updated by: Haukeland University Hospital

Cognitive Impairment in ALS: Screening Tools, Experiences and Prognosis

Cognitive impairment is present in about 30-50% of the patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Suitable screening tools are available, but none of these are evaluated in a Norwegian population.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Screening of cognitive and behavioral impairment is a distinct recommendation in ALS-specific health-care. Thus, a rapid screening tool valid for use in Norway is urgent. However, cognitive assessment for patients with ALS can be difficult due to the complexity of cognitive impairment, as well as motor challenges with writing, drawing and speaking. Therefore, only ALS-specific, multi domain screening instruments with integrated behavioral sections should be used. Internationally, the Edinburgh cognitive and behavioral amyotrophic lateral sclerosis screen (ECAS), is recommended for the purpose. Besides being quick and easy to administer, the ECAS is shown to be sensitive and have high specificity to ALS-specific dysfunction and behavioral changes. The introduction of ECAS has probably contributed to a more nuanced picture of cognitive impairment in ALS than previously assumed. Therefore the ECAS has been translated and culturally adapted into Norwegian (ECAS-N). Based on scores from healthy people, Norwegian age- and educational-adjusted norms for verbal fluency (n=277) and cut-off-scores (n=85) for abnormal findings are established. However, further investigation of psychometric properties of the ECAS-N is needed. The objectives of the study are: 1. To investigate if the ECAS-N reflect cognitive impairment (internal consistency), and is robust to measurement errors due to different times of testing (test-retest reliability) and different raters (interrater reliability) 2. To investigate if the ECAS-N can be used to distinguish between people with ALS-specific cognitive impairment, and those who do not have cognitive impairment, and those who have cognitive impairment due to other disorders (construct validity).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
31

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Norway
      • Bergen, Norway, 5021
        • Haukeland University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who fulfill the inclution criteria and attending to the ALS-unit at HUH, St.Olavs Hospital, Hospital of Southern Norway or Namsos Hospital, within 4 months after being diagnosed With ALS.

Healthy People and patients with dementia will constitute Control groups

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • voluntary informed consent
  • native Norwegian speaker
  • aged between 35 and 85 years old (only for Controls)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • great difficulties in writing og Reading
  • comorbid Medical history
  • neurological disorders others than ALS
  • psychiatric history of importance to cognitive function

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Patients with ALS
Patients with ALS will be tested by two independent testers with the ECAS-N at 4 months (baseline) and 8 months (follow-up), and the MoCA at 4 months (baseline) by one tester
Diagnostic test: ECAS-N
All participants included will be tested with the ECAS-N
Other Names:
  • Edinburgh cognitive and behavioral ALS screen (Norwegian)
Diagnostic test: MoCA
All included patients With ALS will be tested With the MoCA
Other Names:
  • Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA)
Healthy controls
Persons with no cognitive impairment will be tested with the ECAS-N once, by one tester
Diagnostic test: ECAS-N
All participants included will be tested with the ECAS-N
Other Names:
  • Edinburgh cognitive and behavioral ALS screen (Norwegian)
Controls with dementia
Persons with cognitive impairment due to other disorders will be tested with the ECAS-N once, by one tester
Diagnostic test: ECAS-N
All participants included will be tested with the ECAS-N
Other Names:
  • Edinburgh cognitive and behavioral ALS screen (Norwegian)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Edinburgh cognitive and behavioural amyotrophic lateral sclerosis screen - Norwegian Version (ECAS-N)
Time Frame: 4 months
We will use the ALS-specific sub-score (minimum score = 0, maximum score = 100), the ALS non-specific sub-score (minimum score = 0, maximum score = 36), a summed total ECAS-N score (minimum score =0, maximum score =136), the sub score of behavioural changes (minimum score = 0, maximum score = 10) and the sub score of psychotic change (minimum score = 0, maximum score = 3). A dichotomized cut-off scores for normality will also be used for the ALS-specific cut-off score of 65 or over, the non ALS-specific cut-off score of 24 or over and the total ECAS-N cut-off score of 92 or over. For the ALS-specific scores, non ALS-specific scores and total ECAS-N scores, high scores indicate less problems than low scores. For the sub score of behavioural change and the sub score of psychotic change, high scores indicate more problems than low scores.
4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) - Norwegian version
Time Frame: 4 months
We will use the total MoCA score (minimum score = 0, maximum score = 30) and a dichotomized cut-off score for normality of 26 or over. High scores indicate less problems than low scores
4 months
Change from 4 months Edinburgh cognitive and behavioural amyotrophic lateral sclerosis screen - Norwegian Version (ECAS-N) at 8 months
Time Frame: 8 months
We will use the changed ALS-specific sub-score (minimum score = 0, maximum score = 100), the changed ALS non-specific sub-score (minimum score = 0, maximum score = 36), a changed summed total ECAS-N score (minimum score =0, maximum score =136), the changed sub score of behavioural changes (minimum score = 0, maximum score = 10) and the changed sub score of psychotic change (minimum score = 0, maximum score = 3). A changed dichotomized cut-off scores for normality will also be used for the ALS-specific cut-off score of 65 or over, the non ALS-specific cut-off score of 24 or over and the total ECAS-N cut-off score of 92 or over. For the ALS-specific scores, non ALS-specific scores and total ECAS-N scores, high scores indicate less problems than low scores. For the sub score of behavioural change and the sub score of psychotic change, high scores indicate more problems than low scores.
8 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Haukeland University Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Western Norway University of Applied Sciences

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Tina Taule, PhD, Haukeland University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 4, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 1, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 5, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 6, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 30, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 28, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2016/3166

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings