Reactivity of Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder to an Ecological Interpersonal Stress (ROI)

December 19, 2023 updated by: University Hospital, Montpellier

Reactivity of Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder to an Ecological Interpersonal Stress : Pathophysiology of Suicidal Behaviors Study Model

Use lay language.

According to the World Health Organization 1 death by suicide occurs every 40 seconds, leading suicide prevention to one of the public health priority.

BPD (Borderline Personality Disorder) is a common condition affecting 6% of the population.

This disorder is characterized by unstable emotions, unstable mood, difficulties with relationship and feer of abandonment.

Borderline Personality Disorder is also the psychopathology the most related to suicidal attempts.

Indeed, up to 50% of the patients admitted to hospital after a suicide attempt are diagnosis with a Borderline Personality Disorder

Negative interpersonal events (events occurring between two people) are known as the main stressor that trigger a suicidal attempt.

People with a Borderline Personality Disorder are highly sensitive to it.

Moreover, neuropeptides such as oxytocin (OXT), vasopressin and opioid are known to be involved in the regulation of the emotions, especially those linked to relationship.

The purpose of this study is to improve knowledge in suicidal behaviors.

After simulating an interpersonal stress, the evolution of plasma neuropeptides level (OXT, vasopressin and opioid) of patients with a BPD will be compared to healthy controls (HC).

Clinical data reflecting how the participant is feeling will be collected as well.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

A dysregulation of the neuropeptides (OXT, vasopressin and opioid) could explain the dysregulation of the emotions of people with Borderline Personality Disorder.

Up to this date there is no other study measuring neuropeptides kinetics of patient with Borderline Personality Disorder after an interpersonal stress.

This task of stress is meant to reproduce what people with Borderline Personality Disorder suffer in their everyday life (ecological).

To reach this point, an imaginary interpersonal stress will be asked to be reproduced by the participants.

Neuropeptides concentrations and clinical data (fear, shame, anger, moral pain, compelling needs (suicidal and non-suicidal)) will be collected at different times (pre stress, post stress immediat, 5 minutes post stress,15 minutes post stress and 40 minutes post stress)

As copeptin ( fragment C terminal of the vasopressin) and vasopressin are found in stoichiometric concentration in the plasma as copeptin is more stable than vasopressin, plasma copeptin level will be used to reflect the one of vasopressin.

The hypothesis is that both the neuropeptide variation and clinical data before and after the interpersonal stress will be higher for the patient with Borderline Personality Disorder than healthy controls.

A correlation between clinical assessments and neuropeptides kinetics is expected. This study will help to identify inter-individual and contextual factors impacting neuropeptide's kinetics

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
116

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Montpellier, France, 34295
        • Hospital Lapeyronie

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

No specific inclusion criteria :

  • If taking hormonal contraceptive: able to participate between the 3rd and 18th day after taking the contraceptive If not taking hormonal contraceptive: able to participate between the 5th and 12th day after the first day of the last period
  • Able to understand the nature, purpose and methodology of the study
  • Having signed the informed consent
  • To be affiliated to a social security scheme

Specific inclusion criteria

Borderline Personality Disorder(BPD) :

- Clinical diagnosis of BPD using the SCID II (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis II Personality Disorders)

Healthy controls:

- No personal history of psychiatric disorders (Axis I ) defined by the MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview according to the DSM-5 criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal of participation
  • Subject protected by law (guardianship)
  • Life time diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder or schizophrenia
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Deprived of liberty Subject (by judicial or administrative decision)
  • Exclusion period in relation to another protocol
  • Having reached the maximum annual amount of allowances of € 4,500

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: BPD
Blood sample After simulating an interpersonal stress, the evolution of plasma neuropeptides level (OXT, vasopressin and opioid) of patients with a BPD
Other: Interpersonal stress

Through an interview the evaluator will make a 1 to 2 pages script, written in first-person and in present tense. It will involve an interpersonal conflict between the participants and the person who once trigger their feeling of abandonment.

After reading the script the participants will have to close their eyes and imagine the event as if was happening to them, now, in real time, and think about it during 3 minutes.

To evaluate the stress efficiency, the evaluator will ask 2 questions :

  • 1) "from 0 (no distress at all) to 10 (maximal unimaginable distress), to wich point this script bring distress to you?"
  • 2) "from 0 (I can not at all) to 10 (I can completely), to wich point are you able to imagine the scenario in real time, as if you were living it?"
Active Comparator: HC
Blood sample After simulating an interpersonal stress, the evolution of plasma neuropeptides level (OXT, vasopressin and opioid) of healthy controls (HC) patients .without any history of psychopathology
Other: Interpersonal stress

Through an interview the evaluator will make a 1 to 2 pages script, written in first-person and in present tense. It will involve an interpersonal conflict between the participants and the person who once trigger their feeling of abandonment.

After reading the script the participants will have to close their eyes and imagine the event as if was happening to them, now, in real time, and think about it during 3 minutes.

To evaluate the stress efficiency, the evaluator will ask 2 questions :

  • 1) "from 0 (no distress at all) to 10 (maximal unimaginable distress), to wich point this script bring distress to you?"
  • 2) "from 0 (I can not at all) to 10 (I can completely), to wich point are you able to imagine the scenario in real time, as if you were living it?"

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Variation of plasma oxytocin concentrations after an interpersonal stress
Time Frame: from pre interpersonal stress to 5 minutes post stress
Evaluate and compare the variation of plasma oxytocin concentrations before and after an interpersonal stress of patients with BPDs vs healthy controls between pre stress to 5 minutes post interpersonal stress.
from pre interpersonal stress to 5 minutes post stress

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evolution of plasma oxytocin concentrations
Time Frame: from pre stress to 40 minutes post interpersonal stress
Evaluate and compare the evolution of plasma oxytocin concentrations before and after an interpersonal stress of patients with BPDs vs healthy controls. pre stress, post stress immediat, 5 minutes post stress, 15 minutes post stress and 40 minutes post stress.
from pre stress to 40 minutes post interpersonal stress
Evolution of plasma copeptin concentrations
Time Frame: from pre stress to 40 minutes post interpersonal stress
Evaluate and compare the evolution of plasma copeptin concentrations before and after an interpersonal stress of patients with BPDs vs healthy controls. pre stress, post stress immediat, 5 minutes post stress, 15 minutes post stress and 40 minutes post stress.
from pre stress to 40 minutes post interpersonal stress
Evolution of plasma β-endorphin concentrations
Time Frame: from pre stress to 40 minutes post interpersonal stress
Evaluate and compare the evolution of plasma β-endorphin concentrations before and after an interpersonal stress of patients with BPDs vs healthy controls. pre stress, post stress immediat, 5 minutes post stress, 15 minutes post stress and 40 minutes post stress.
from pre stress to 40 minutes post interpersonal stress
self-damaging compelling needs(suicidal) pre stress
Time Frame: pre stress before the interpersonal stress
Basal level of self-damaging compelling needs (suicidal) using a numerical scale (0 = I don't want to kill myself ; 10 = Needs to kill myself maximal imaginable ), before an interpersonal stress.
pre stress before the interpersonal stress
Evolution of clinical variables: self-damaging compelling needs(suicidal)
Time Frame: from pre stress to 40 minutes post interpersonal stress
Evolution of the self-damaging compelling needs (suicidal) using a numerical scale (0 = I don't want to kill myself ; 10 = Needs to kill myself maximal imaginable ) post stress immediat, 5 minutes, 15 minutes and 40 minutes after an interpersonal stress of patients with BPDs in comparison to healthy controls.
from pre stress to 40 minutes post interpersonal stress
Evolution of clinical variables: self-damaging compelling needs(non-suicidal)
Time Frame: from post stress immediat to 40 minutes just after the interpersonal stress
Evolution of the self-damaging compelling needs (suicidal) using a numerical scale (0 = I don't want to kill myself ; 10 = Needs to kill myself maximal imaginable ) post stress immediat, 5 minutes, 15 minutes and 40 minutes after an interpersonal stress of patients with BPDs in comparison to healthy controls..
from post stress immediat to 40 minutes just after the interpersonal stress
Clinical variable: self-damaging compelling needs(non-suicidal)
Time Frame: pre stress before the interpersonal stress
Basal level of self-damaging compelling needs (non-suicidal) using a numerical scale (0 = I don't want to hurt myself ; 10 = Needs to hurt myself maximal imaginable), just before an interpersonal stress.
pre stress before the interpersonal stress
Evolution of self-damaging compelling needs(non-suicidal)
Time Frame: from post stress immediat to 40 minutes just after the interpersonal stress
Evolution of the self-damaging compelling needs (non-suicidal) using a numerical scale (0 = I don't want to hurt myself ; 10 = Needs to hurt myself maximal imaginable) post stress immediat, 5 minutes, 15 minutes and 40 minutes after an interpersonal stress, of patients with BPDs in comparison to healthy controls.
from post stress immediat to 40 minutes just after the interpersonal stress
psychological pain
Time Frame: pre stress just before the interpersonal stress
Basal level of psychological pain using a numerical scale (0 =No psychological pain ; 10= Psychological pain maximal imaginable), just before an interpersonal stress.
pre stress just before the interpersonal stress
Evolution of clinical variables: psychological pain
Time Frame: from post stress immediat to 40 minutes just after the interpersonal stress
Evolution of psychological pain using a numerical scale (0 =No psychological pain ; 10= Psychological pain maximal imaginable) post stress immediat, 5 minutes, 15 minutes and 40 minutes after an interpersonal stress, of patients with BPDs in comparison to healthy controls.
from post stress immediat to 40 minutes just after the interpersonal stress
Clinical variable: state of shame
Time Frame: pre stress just before the interpersonal stress
just before the interpersonal stress Description: Basal level of shame using a numerical scale (0 = No shame ; 10 = Shame maximal imaginable), before an interpersonal stress.
pre stress just before the interpersonal stress
Evolution of clinical variables: state of shame
Time Frame: from post stress immediat to 40 minutes just after the interpersonal stress
Evolution of the state of shame using a numerical scale (0 = No shame ; 10 = Shame maximal imaginable), post stress immediat, 5 minutes, 15 minutes and 40 minutes after an interpersonal stress of patients with BPDs in comparison to healthy controls.
from post stress immediat to 40 minutes just after the interpersonal stress
Clinical variable: state of anger
Time Frame: pre stress just before the interpersonal stress
Basal level of anger using a numerical scale (0 = No anger ; 10 = Anger maximal imaginable), before an interpersonal stress.
pre stress just before the interpersonal stress
Evolution of clinical variables: state of anger
Time Frame: from post stress immediat to 40 minutes just after the interpersonal stress
Evolution of the state of anger using a numerical scale(0 = No anger ; 10 = Anger maximal imaginable), post stress immediat, 5 minutes, 15 minutes and 40 minutes after an interpersonal stress of patients with BPDs in comparison to healthy controls
from post stress immediat to 40 minutes just after the interpersonal stress
Clinical variable: state of fear
Time Frame: pre stress just before the interpersonal stress
Basal level of fear using a numerical scale (0 = No fear ; 10 = Fear maximal imaginable), before an interpersonal stress.
pre stress just before the interpersonal stress
Evolution of clinical variables: state of fear
Time Frame: from post stress immediat to 40 minutes just after the interpersonal stress
Evolution of the state of fear using a numerical scale (0 = No fear ; 10 = Fear maximal imaginable) post stress immediat, 5 minutes, 15 minutes and 40 minutes after an interpersonal stress of patients with BPDs in comparison to healthy controls.
from post stress immediat to 40 minutes just after the interpersonal stress

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital, Montpellier

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Deborah Ducasse, MD, Urgence psychiatric lapeyonie Hospital Montpellier

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 27, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 18, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 18, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 18, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 18, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 27, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 20, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 19, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • RECHMPL17_0394

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Female

Clinical Trials on Interpersonal stress

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings