Artificial Intelligence Screening on Patients With Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma (AI)

July 26, 2018 updated by: Haotian Lin, Sun Yat-sen University
The Tomey CASIA (Tomey Corporation, Nagoya, Japan) is a novel rapid imaging device that captures high-quality imaging of the entire anterior chamber of the eye over detailed imaging of a single section. In this prospective study, we want to investigate and compare the anatomical structure of the drainage angle of the eye in patients with different types glaucoma using Tomey machine. This study gives us a better understanding of the predictability, validity and accuracy of Tomey machine in the diagnosis of different types of glaucoma. Moreover, the data collected here will be used to create an artificial intelligence (AI) platform to screen certain type of glaucoma.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Patients ≥18 years old from ophthalmic clinics with or without glaucoma were enrolled to this respective observational clinical study. However, patients with any history of eye surgery (except cataract surgery) including laser procedure were excluded. The investigators will review patients' medical chart and update any medical history in your medical record. If new scans are needed, investigators will do them at the time of patients' current visit and it will require about 30 mins. CASIA SS-OCT (CASIA 2) is a non-contact scan of the front of the eye with higher resolution and provides deeper, wider and three- dimensional views. It is the newest scan machine. It is not FDA-approved but is approved in many other countries including Japan for patient use. We may perform the scan in the light and dark condition. We may also perform the routine scan to capture images of the anterior part of the eye for comparison purpose. The results of the scanned data will be among patients' medical records. Age, sex and ethnicity within your medical records will also be used for the analysis.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Haotian Lin, M.D,Ph.D

Study Locations

  • China
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510060
        • Recruiting
        • Zhognshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Outpatients ≥18 years old with or without glaucoma

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with or without glaucoma

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with any history of eye surgery (except cataract surgery) including laser procedure.
  • Age < =18 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Normal
Patients without any type of glaucoma
Device: CASIA 2 OCT
Using CASIA 2 OCT to assess the anterior chamber angle of the eye in the glaucomatous patients withconventional imaging methods
Primary angle closure glaucoma
Patients with primary angle closure glaucoma
Device: CASIA 2 OCT
Using CASIA 2 OCT to assess the anterior chamber angle of the eye in the glaucomatous patients withconventional imaging methods
Primary open-angle glaucoma
Patients with primary open-angle glaucoma
Device: CASIA 2 OCT
Using CASIA 2 OCT to assess the anterior chamber angle of the eye in the glaucomatous patients withconventional imaging methods

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The accuracy of the CASIA 2 OCT
Time Frame: baseline
To compare the clinical applicability, accuracy, and validity of the CASIA 2 OCT (Tomey, Nagoya, Japan) in the assessment of anterior chamber angle of the eye in the glaucomatous patients withconventional imaging methods.
baseline
The sensitivity and specificity of the AI
Time Frame: baseline
To create an AI program to reliably screen patients with certain type of glaucoma (such as primary angle closure glaucoma, PACG) using images from CASIA 2 OCT. To test the sensitivity and specificity of the AI program to screen patients with glaucoma using images from CASIA 2 OCT. Another database comprised of CASIA 2 OCT images will be created and used to test the AI program. The diagnosis based on the AI program will be compared with diagnosis from glaucoma specialist.
baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Sun Yat-sen University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of California

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 26, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 26, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 2, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 2, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 26, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CCPMOH2018-China-4

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings