The Influence of a Fasting Mimicking Diet on Ulcerative Colitis

February 23, 2026 updated by: Sidhartha Ranjit Sinha, Stanford University
The purpose of this study is to see how a diet that mimics fasting effects inflammation in patients with mild to moderate Ulcerative Colitis (UC). The diet may allow users to receive the benefits of fasting while also being able to enjoy food (the ingredients of which are GRAS (generally recognized as safe) by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Research on dietary interventions and UC are very limited. Fasting mimicking diets (FMD) have been studied with support of the National Institute of Health and published in leading journals. This research investigates whether markers of inflammation decrease and/or quality of life increases after three cycles of a five-day period of the fasting mimicking diet, and may provide rationale for its use to treat UC.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
75

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 66 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Mild to moderate Ulcerative Colitis on the partial Mayo Score out of 9 (score between 2 to 7)
  • Age of 18-70 at start of study (inclusive)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women who are pregnant or nursing or expect to be pregnant
  • Individuals allergic to nuts
  • Individuals with a body mass index (BMI) lower than 18
  • Individuals diagnosed with a serious medical condition as defined by the patient's physician, unless approved in writing by a physician
  • Individuals who have been severely weakened by a disease or medical procedure,
  • Individuals who are taking medication which may not be safely consumed with a calorie restricted diet
  • Individuals with diabetes who are taking anti-diabetic drugs associated with risk of hypoglycemia
  • Individuals with more than mild-moderate cardiovascular disease or life-threatening cancer (as determined by patient's physician) unless approved by a physician
  • Individuals with history of severe cardiac disease (particularly uncompensated congestive heart failure NYHA grade 2 or more or LVEF < 40%)
  • Individuals with a history of syncope
  • Individuals with dietary needs incompatible with the FMD meal plan
  • Individuals with liver or kidney disorders that may be affected by very low glucose and protein content of the diet.
  • Patients on a caloric restricted diet will also be excluded.
  • Patients with relevant prior gastrointestinal surgery and consequences such as short bowel syndrome, ostomy of small or large intestine, hemi- or total colectomy, proctocolectomy, ileoanal pouch will be excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Fasting Mimicking Diet
Three cycles of a 5-day reduced calorie diet
Other: Fasting Mimicking Diet
5 day reduced calorie diet
Placebo Comparator: Regular Diet Control Arm
Other: Regular Diet
Regular Diet

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical response as per partial Mayo score
Time Frame: Comparison of disease score up to 14 days before starting Cycle 1, and within 6 days after completing Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.
Defined as a decrease from baseline in the partial Mayo score of >= 2 points and either a rectal bleeding subscore of <=1 or a decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of >=1 point, or achieving a partial Mayo score <2. The partial Mayo score consists of the subscores for stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and PGA, omitting endoscopy.
Comparison of disease score up to 14 days before starting Cycle 1, and within 6 days after completing Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical remission as per partial Mayo score
Time Frame: Comparison of disease score up to 14 days before starting Cycle 1, and within 6 days after completing Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.
Defined as a partial Mayo score < 2 points. The partial Mayo score consists of the subscores for stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and PGA, omitting endoscopy.
Comparison of disease score up to 14 days before starting Cycle 1, and within 6 days after completing Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.
Clinical remission as per modified Mayo (mMayo) score
Time Frame: Comparison of disease score up to 14 days before starting Cycle 1, and within 6 days after completing Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.
Defined as mMayo score <= 1 point, with rectal bleeding and stool frequency subscore of 0, and endoscopy subscore of 0 or 1. The mMayo score consists of the subscores for stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and endoscopy, omitting PGA.
Comparison of disease score up to 14 days before starting Cycle 1, and within 6 days after completing Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.
Clinical response as per mMayo score
Time Frame: Comparison of disease score up to 14 days before starting Cycle 1, and within 6 days after completing Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.
Defined as a decrease of the mMayo score of >=2 points and either a rectal bleeding subscore of <=1 or a decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of >=1 point.
Comparison of disease score up to 14 days before starting Cycle 1, and within 6 days after completing Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.
Patient global assessment
Time Frame: Assessed within 6 days after completing Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.
"Do you believe you are in remission from your UC symptoms?" (Yes/No). No scale.
Assessed within 6 days after completing Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.
Change in C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Time Frame: Comparison of CRP levels up to 14 days before starting Cycle 1, and within 6 days after completing Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.
Change in the inflammatory marker CRP (if elevated at baseline).
Comparison of CRP levels up to 14 days before starting Cycle 1, and within 6 days after completing Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.
Change in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR).
Time Frame: Comparison of ESR levels up to 14 days before starting Cycle 1, and within 6 days after completing Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.
Change of the inflammatory marker ESR (if elevated at baseline).
Comparison of ESR levels up to 14 days before starting Cycle 1, and within 6 days after completing Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.
Change in Fecal Calprotectin.
Time Frame: Comparison of calprotectin levels up to 14 days before starting Cycle 1, and within 6 days after completing Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.
Change of the inflammatory marker fecal calprotectin (if elevated at baseline).
Comparison of calprotectin levels up to 14 days before starting Cycle 1, and within 6 days after completing Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.
Effect of FMD on endoscopic outcomes
Time Frame: Comparison of disease score up to 14 days before starting Cycle 1, and within 6 days after completing Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.
Changes in modified Mayo (mMayo) endoscopic subscore. The subscore ranges from 0 to 3 points with higher scores reflecting more severe disease.
Comparison of disease score up to 14 days before starting Cycle 1, and within 6 days after completing Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.
Symptomatic remission as per Patient Reported Outcome (PRO2) score
Time Frame: Comparison of disease score up to 14 days before starting Cycle 1, and within 6 days after completing Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.
Defined as a Mayo stool frequency subscore of 0 or 1 and a Mayo rectal bleeding subscore of 0.
Comparison of disease score up to 14 days before starting Cycle 1, and within 6 days after completing Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.
Change in Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease questionnaire (SIBDQ) score
Time Frame: Comparison of SIBDQ score up to 14 days before starting Cycle 1, and within 6 days after completing Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.
Quality of life score in UC patients. Response to each of the questions is graded from 1 to 7 (1 being the worst situation and 7 the best).
Comparison of SIBDQ score up to 14 days before starting Cycle 1, and within 6 days after completing Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of primary and key secondary endpoints at baseline versus 3 months after the start of Cycle 3.
Time Frame: Comparison of endpoints up to 14 days before starting Cycle 1, and 3 months after the start of Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.
Outcomes 1 to 11 at additional time points.
Comparison of endpoints up to 14 days before starting Cycle 1, and 3 months after the start of Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.
Changes in cytokines/chemokines and immune cell profiles using flow cytometry and mass cytometry (CyTOF).
Time Frame: Comparison of cytokines/chemokines/immune cell profiles up to 14 days before starting Cycle 1, and within 6 days after completing Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.
Cytokines/chemokines (e.g. TNF-alpha, IL-6, IL-10, IFN-gamma, α4β7, CCR1, and CCR9) and immune cell profiles.
Comparison of cytokines/chemokines/immune cell profiles up to 14 days before starting Cycle 1, and within 6 days after completing Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.
Differences in clinical markers of disease activity at baseline versus within 6 days after completing Cycle 1.
Time Frame: Comparison of clinical markers up to 14 days before starting Cycle 1, and within 6 days after completing Cycle 1. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.
Clinical markers of disease activity are CRP, ESR and fecal Calprotectin (if elevated at baseline).
Comparison of clinical markers up to 14 days before starting Cycle 1, and within 6 days after completing Cycle 1. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.
Changes in gut metabolites (including short-chain fatty acid and bile acid profiles) and microbiome profiles (using 16S rRNA/shotgun metagenomics).
Time Frame: Comparison of characteristics up to 14 days before Cycle 1, within 6 days after completing Cycle 3, and 3 months after start of Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.
Gut metabolites include short-chain fatty acid and bile acid profiles.
Comparison of characteristics up to 14 days before Cycle 1, within 6 days after completing Cycle 3, and 3 months after start of Cycle 3. 1 cycle of IRCD lasts 5 days and is administered once a month, followed by regular diet for the rest of the month.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Stanford University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Sidhartha R Sinha, MD, Stanford University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 15, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 3, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 30, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 6, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 23, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB 47075

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings