Clinical Efficacy of a New Piezoelectric Technique for Wisdom Teeth Extraction
Clinical Efficacy of a New Piezoelectric Technique for Wisdom Teeth Extraction Without Using Manual Tools: a Clinical Randomized Controlled Study.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: MARIA GABRIELLA GRUSOVIN, DDS
- Phone Number: +39 3482250966
- Email: GABRI.GRUSOVIN@TISCALI.IT
Study Contact Backup
- Name: TOMASO VERCELLOTTI, MDS
- Phone Number: +39 335382085
- Email: TOMASO@VERCELLOTTI.COM
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bolzano, Italy, 39100
- Recruiting
- Bolzano Hospital
-
Contact:
- FABRIZIO FONTANELLA, MDS
- Phone Number: +39471908408
- Email: FABRIZIO.FONTANELLA@ASBZ.IT
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients referred for wisdom tooth extraction
- Patients older than 18 years old and able to sign the informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- General contraindications to surgery.
- Patients irradiated in the head and neck area.
- Immunosuppressed or immunocompromised patients.
- Patients who took or are taking bisphosphonates intravenously.
- Uncontrolled diabetes
- Presence of oral pathologies that seriously involved oral mucosa
- Patients with poor oral hygiene and motivation.
- Patients with oral pathologies with serious mucosal involvement
- Pregnancy or lactation.
- Addiction to alcohol or drugs.
- Psychiatric problems.
- Patients with an acute infection inflammation around the tooth to be extracted.
- Wisdom teeth with roots attached or positioned around the nerve
- Patients unable to come to the required follow up visits
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: QUADRUPLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: piezoelectric extraction
The flap will be raised using a Piezoelectric elevator, the eventual bone around the third molar crown will be removed with the same piezoelectric lever used for luxation and root extraction.
The eventual rizectomy will be performed using a piezoelectric saw.
|
Only Piezoelectric device will be used for surgical wisdom teeth extraction
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: conventional extraction
The flap will be raised using a manual elevator and the eventual bone around the third molar crown will be removed with a bone bur with a straight handpiece while the eventual rizectomy will be performed using a bone bur.
Manual levers will be used for luxation and tooth extraction
|
Only manual instruments and burs on straight handpick will be used for wisdom teeth extraction
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Subjective Patient's perception of pain
Time Frame: 7 days
|
- a visual analogue scale with categorical value from 0 to 10 will be filled by the patient at 6 hours after surgical treatment and every morning in the following 7 days.
|
7 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient's perception of pain
Time Frame: 7 days
|
the number of analgesics taken by the patients will be recorded: the patient will register the number of tablets taken after the surgery up to the 7th day
|
7 days
|
|
Duration of the surgical treatment
Time Frame: 1 day
|
measured from opening of the flap to end of the extraction, suturing excluded
|
1 day
|
|
Complication
Time Frame: 7 days
|
Any intrasurgical complication will be registered.
Besides swelling and trismus will be evaluated at half an hour, 3 and 7 days after the surgery.
Bleeding will be evaluated half an hour after the treatment.
|
7 days
|
|
Healing of soft tissues
Time Frame: 7 days
|
presence of normal healing, inflammation, suppuration will be recorded
|
7 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: FABRIZIO FONTANELLA, MDS, Bolzano Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Piersanti L, Dilorenzo M, Monaco G, Marchetti C. Piezosurgery or conventional rotatory instruments for inferior third molar extractions? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Sep;72(9):1647-52. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.04.032. Epub 2014 May 6.
- Vercellotti T Cap. 4 Tecniche di Estrazione dentale pag 31- 47 Piezosurgery elementi essenziali. Ed Quintessenza 2009
- Vercellotti T Cap.8 Nuove tecniche estrazioni dentali pag. 185 -255. La chirurgia ossea piezoelettrica: una nuova era. Ed Quintessenza 2016
- Barone A, Marconcini S, Giacomelli L, Rispoli L, Calvo JL, Covani U. A randomized clinical evaluation of ultrasound bone surgery versus traditional rotary instruments in lower third molar extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Feb;68(2):330-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.03.053. Epub 2010 Jan 15. Erratum In: J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Apr 28;:
- Itro A, Lupo G, Marra A, Carotenuto A, Cocozza E, Filipi M, D'Amato S. The piezoelectric osteotomy technique compared to the one with rotary instruments in the surgery of included third molars. A clinical study. Minerva Stomatol. 2012 Jun;61(6):247-53. English, Spanish.
- Goyal M, Marya K, Jhamb A, Chawla S, Sonoo PR, Singh V, Aggarwal A. Comparative evaluation of surgical outcome after removal of impacted mandibular third molars using a Piezotome or a conventional handpiece: a prospective study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Sep;50(6):556-61. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.10.010. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
- Sortino F, Pedulla E, Masoli V. The piezoelectric and rotatory osteotomy technique in impacted third molar surgery: comparison of postoperative recovery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Dec;66(12):2444-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.004.
- Spinato S, Rebaudi A, Bernardello F, Bertoldi C, Zaffe D. Piezosurgical treatment of crestal bone: quantitative comparison of post-extractive socket outcomes with those of traditional treatment. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Mar;27(3):361-6. doi: 10.1111/clr.12555. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
- Vercellotti T. Technological characteristics and clinical indications of piezoelectric bone surgery. Minerva Stomatol. 2004 May;53(5):207-14. English, Italian.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 0060125-BZ
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.