Evaluation of the Clinical Efficacy of Y-STRUT® Medical Device Implanted for Contralateral Percutaneous Internal Fixation of Proximal Femur, in Patient With a Low Energy Per Trochanteric Fracture on the First Side

April 27, 2020 updated by: Hyprevention

National, Multicentre, Prospective, Observational Study, to Evaluate the Clinical Efficacy of Y-STRUT® Medical Device Implanted for Contralateral Percutaneous Internal Fixation of Proximal Femur, in Patient With a Low Energy Per Trochanteric Fracture on the First Side

HIP50 is a national, multicentre, prospective, observational study, in patients presenting a first low energy per trochanteric hip fracture on one side and treated with Y-STRUT® device implanted on the contralateral proximal femur as percutaneous internal fixation to prevent contralateral hip fracture in case of osteoporosis.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the studied medical device by measuring the frequency of patient with a fracture at the implantation site within 1 year after implantation.

A total of 50 patients from France will be enrolled (until December 2020) and followed up to 24 months.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
10

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Ambérieu-en-Bugey, France, 01500
        • Hôpital Privé d'Ambérieu
      • Clamart, France, 92140
        • Hôpital Antoine Béclère
      • La Tronche, France, 38700
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes
      • Orléans, France, 45100
        • Centre Hospitalier Régional Orléans
      • Tours, France, 37000
        • Nouvelle Clinique de Tours Plus St Gatien

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients presenting a first low energy per trochanteric hip fracture on one side and treated with Y-STRUT® device implanted on the contralateral proximal femur as percutaneous internal fixation.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient of 60 years and older, according to CE indication;
  • Patient with information form signed to participate in the study;
  • Patients presenting a first low energy hip fracture on one side and having a Y-STRUT® device implanted on the contralateral hip between 0 and 120 days after the treatment of the fracture of the first hip;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient who refuse to participate to this study;
  • Patient implanted with Y-STRUT® for another indication;
  • Patient already enrolled in a clinical study, excluding his participation to HIP50.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Frequency of post-operative fracture [Clinical efficacy of the device]
Time Frame: At 12 months
Frequency of Y-STRUT® implanted patients with a fracture at the implantation site
At 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Frequency of post-operative fracture [Clinical efficacy of the device]
Time Frame: At 3 and 24 months
Frequency of Y-STRUT® implanted patients with a fracture at the implantation site
At 3 and 24 months
Recording of concomitants treatments [safety and feasibility of the device]
Time Frame: At 3, 12 and 24 months
Recording of all concomitants treatments: analgesic for pain, anti-osteoporotic treatment and other treatments.
At 3, 12 and 24 months
Pain [safety and feasibility of the device]
Time Frame: At 3, 12 and 24 months
Self-evaluation of hip pain using VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), going from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum).
At 3, 12 and 24 months
Walking conditions [safety and feasibility of the device]
Time Frame: At 3, 12 and 24 months
Assessment of resumption of weight-bearing (yes/no, aid)
At 3, 12 and 24 months
Recording of adverse events and device effects [safety and feasibility of the device]
Time Frame: At 3, 12 and 24 months
Recording of the medical device vigilance: all serious adverse events, all adverse events linked to the device or the operative technique, and any other important event reported.
At 3, 12 and 24 months
Surgical procedure duration [learning curve of the procedure]
Time Frame: At the end of the inclusion period (24 months from the first included patient)
Measuring mean/median intervention duration of each procedure. Then, all the durations of successive procedures will be compared among all the investigators.
At the end of the inclusion period (24 months from the first included patient)
Hospitalisation duration [learning curve of the procedure]
Time Frame: At the end of the inclusion period (24 months from the first included patient)]
Measuring mean/median hospitalisation duration. Then, all the durations of successive hospitalisations will be compared among all the investigators.
At the end of the inclusion period (24 months from the first included patient)]
Rate of complications [learning curve of the procedure]
Time Frame: At the end of the inclusion period (24 months from the first included patient)
Assessing types and frequencies of procedures complications (per-op and post-op). Then, all the rate of complications will be compared among all the investigators.
At the end of the inclusion period (24 months from the first included patient)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hyprevention

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 6, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 24, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 24, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 21, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 23, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 27, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 29, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 27, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HIP50

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoporosis

Clinical Trials on Y-STRUT® (Hyprevention, Pessac, France)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings