Understanding and Intervening With Heavy Drinking Among Patients With HIV and HCV

July 21, 2021 updated by: Jennifer C Elliott, New York State Psychiatric Institute

Understanding and Intervening With Heavy Drinking Among Patients With HIV and HCV: Clinical Trial

Among patients with HIV, especially those also infected with HCV, heavy drinking is associated with significant risks to health. However, little is known about how to best intervene with co-infected heavy drinkers, a particularly high risk group for whom targeted intervention has not been developed. Therefore, this study proposes to test a newly developed drinking-reduction intervention for patients with both HIV and HCV, which combines components of successful interventions developed for HIV and for liver disease patients.

60 HIV/HCV co-infected drinkers from HIV primary care will be recruited in order to ensure an adequate final sample size of 45 participants completing the study. A clinic recruiter will identify and refer potential participants based on their medical record, who will then be screened for eligibility by the research coordinator. Potential participants from outside of this clinic will also be recruited through self-referrals via flyers and through RecruitMe, an online based recruitment tool. Participants will be randomly assigned to an intervention or control condition, while ensuring that equal numbers of individuals with alcohol use disorder are assigned to each condition. The intervention condition will receive brief in-person sessions with a counselor and will be asked to use a smartphone app daily to keep track of drinking and other health behaviors for two months. The intervention sessions will include information about HIV, HCV and alcohol, and the counselor will give the participant information about their liver function and alcohol use to try to motivate them to drink less. The control condition will simply be asked to drink less and will be given pamphlets with general information on HIV, Hepatitis C, and drinking from educational websites on HIV/HCV co-infection. The intervention condition will then be evaluated to see if it was more effective at reducing drinking than the control condition.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Patients with HIV have high rates of heavy drinking and alcohol problems, and face serious medical consequences from this use. Some research suggests that alcohol can increase viral load and decrease CD4 (cluster of differentiation 4; e.g., T helper cells) count, although this literature is conflicting. It also increases risk for liver damage, as does hepatitis co-infection, making liver disease a leading cause of death for patients with HIV. Patients with alcohol problems are also less adherent to antiretroviral therapy (ART), and some intentionally skip ART to try to avoid hepatotoxic effects of combining ART with alcohol. Some studies also show alcohol's interference with other aspects of engagement in HIV care.

Approximately 25% of HIV-infected patients are co-infected with HCV. Although HCV alone can lead to liver damage, HIV accelerates this progression, as does heavy drinking. Further, individuals with HCV who drink heavily may be less likely to access HCV medication. Despite serious health risks associated with alcohol use, some research suggests that HIV/HCV patients drink more than HIV mono-infected patients.

Growing recognition of alcohol-related harm in HIV patients has stimulated the development of drinking reduction interventions for HIV infected heavy drinkers, some of which have been successful. Some interventions for HCV mono-infected drinkers and liver disease patients have also shown promise. Yet there are no known successful interventions that target HIV/HCV co-infected patients, a group with elevated drinking and particularly high consequences of drinking. Interventions for HIV patients address HIV health, but do not address liver fibrosis, which is an urgent threat to survival for co-infected patients. Interventions for liver disease patients discuss fibrosis to motivate drinking reduction, but neglect HIV and important topics such as ART adherence. Given that the drinking interventions for HIV and liver disease patients both effectively target drinking in medical patients, albeit through attention to different medical issues, such approaches can and should be integrated to provide an intervention that best meets the needs of patients with both HIV and HCV, a particularly high-risk group. In order to meet this need, an intervention will be tested for HIV/HCV co-infected drinkers. A total of 60 patients will be recruited and randomized to receive either the newly developed intervention or an educational control.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
31

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • NewYork-Presbyterian / Columbia University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 through 99 (inclusive)
  • HIV infection
  • Ever been diagnosed with HCV infection (regardless of treatment status; including active or remitted infection)
  • Recent (last 3 month) liver panel results available
  • During prior 30 days, ≥4 drinks in one day at least once
  • Can speak and read English
  • Current and regular HIV care in NYC metro area

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participation in ongoing HealthCall study at Montefiore Hospital
  • Potential participant has definite plans to leave the greater New York metropolitan area during study period
  • Potential participant is psychotic, suicidal, or homicidal
  • Potential participant is at-risk for developing alcohol withdrawal symptoms

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Intervention: (Clinician's Guide + HealthCall for HIV/HCV)
Behavioral: Intervention: (Clinician's Guide + HealthCall for HIV/HCV)
This intervention consists of an adaptation of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinician's Guide (CG; NIAAA, 2007) in conjunction with the previously tested HealthCall smartphone app program (Hasin et al., 2013; Hasin et al., 2014). Participants will complete a brief baseline meeting (~20 minutes) with a counselor to discuss alcohol use, liver function, and HIV medication adherence. They will track their drinking using HealthCall for 60 days, with brief follow-up meetings with their counselor to check in about their drinking 30 and 60 days later.
No Intervention: Educational control condition
Participant will spend 20 minutes at the clinic, observed by the counselor, reviewing an educational pamphlet on drinking, HIV, and HCV.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Drinks Per Drinking Day Measured Using Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) at 60 Days.
Time Frame: 60 days (end of treatment)
Mean drinks per drinking day in the last 30 days, assessed at baseline and repeatedly during follow-up so that change can be analyzed. Abstention is coded as zero.
60 days (end of treatment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Number of Days Drank as Assessed by Item From the Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule (AUDADIS)
Time Frame: 60 days (end of treatment)
Number of days drank in the last 30 days (RANGE 0-30) was assessed at baseline and repeatedly during follow-up so that change can be analyzed. A change value is calculated here such that a negative value indicates a decrease in drinking.
60 days (end of treatment)
Change in Largest Number of Drinks Assessed by Item From the Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule (AUDADIS)
Time Frame: 60 days (end of treatment)
The largest number of drinks consumed within one day in the last 30 days (RANGE 0-30) was assessed at baseline and repeatedly during follow-up so that change can be analyzed. A change value is calculated here such that a negative value indicates a decrease in drinking.
60 days (end of treatment)
Change in Number of Days Binge Drinking as Assessed by Item From the Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule (AUDADIS)
Time Frame: 60 days (end of treatment)
Number of days engaging in binge drinking (4+ drinks) in the last 30 days (RANGE 0-30) was assessed at baseline and repeatedly during follow-up so that change can be analyzed. A change value is calculated here such that a negative value indicates a decrease in drinking.
60 days (end of treatment)
Change in Number of Days Intoxicated as Assessed by Item From the Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule (AUDADIS)
Time Frame: 60 days (end of treatment)
Number of days intoxicated in the last 30 days (RANGE 0-30) was assessed at baseline and repeatedly during follow-up so that change can be analyzed. A change value is calculated here such that a negative value indicates a decrease in drinking.
60 days (end of treatment)

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-efficacy to Change Drinking as Measured by Brief Version of Situational Confidence Questionnaire (SCQ)
Time Frame: 60 days (end of treatment)
Self-efficacy to change drinking in the last 30 days, assessed at baseline and repeatedly during follow-up so that change can be analyzed. Participants rate eight situations regarding their confidence in their ability to resist drinking (0% - Not at all confident to 100% - Totally confident). The final score is an average that can range from 0 (lowest) to 100 (highest) self-efficacy.
60 days (end of treatment)
Readiness to Change Drinking Measured by University of Rhode Island Change Assessment Scale (URICA)
Time Frame: 60 days (end of treatment)

Readiness to change drinking in the last 30 days, assessed at baseline and repeatedly during follow-up so that change can be analyzed.

Higher scores indicate more readiness to change. Range from -2 to +14.

The scale is scored when points are averaged for all four (precontemplation, contemplation, action, maintenance) scales. Add Contemplation + Action + Maintenance averages, then subtract Precontemplation average.
60 days (end of treatment)
Readiness to Change Drinking Measured by The Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale (SOCRATES)
Time Frame: 60 days (end of treatment)

Readiness to change drinking in the last 30 days,assessed at baseline and repeatedly during follow-up so that change can be analyzed.

Higher scores indicate more recognition, ambivalence, and taking steps toward change, respectively. For full range and interpretation, see individual outcomes below.

Recognition scale - Range 7 (very low recognition) to 35 (high recognition)

Ambivalence scale - Range 4 (very low ambivalence) to 20 (very high ambivalence)

Taking Steps scale - Range 8 (very low on taking steps to change drinking) to 40 (very high score)
60 days (end of treatment)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
New York State Psychiatric Institute

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jennifer C Elliott, Ph.D, New York State Psychiatric Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 8, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 8, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 24, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 28, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 29, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 23, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 21, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 7649
  • K23AA023753 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings