Comparison Between a Standard Tube and the Ultra-thin Tritube for Intubation of the Trachea and for Maintaining Access to the Trachea After Anaesthesia, in Patients With an Expected Difficult Direct Laryngoscopy (Tritube)

February 28, 2024 updated by: Michael Seltz Kristensen

Sammenligning Mellem Standard Tube og Den Ultra-tynde Tritube® Til Intubation, og Til Opretholdelse af Adgang Til Trachea Efter anæstesi, Hos Patienter Med Forventet Vanskelig Direkte Laryngoskopi

The investigators compare the ease of intubation between a new ultra-thin endotracheal tube, "Tritube", and a standard endotracheal tube in patients with predictors of difficult laryngoscopy. Furthermore the investigators compare the acceptance of leaving the Tritube in trachea after end of anaesthesia, with the use of a tube exchange catheter.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In patients scheduled for surgery and anaesthesia in the Head-/neck/ear/nose/throat -region the investigators compare the ease of tracheal intubation between a new ultra-thin endotracheal tube, "Tritube", and a standard endotracheal tube in patients with predictors of difficult laryngoscopy. The intubation is performed with an angulated video laryngoscope.

Furthermore the investigators compare the acceptance of leaving the Tritube in trachea after end of anaesthesia, with the use of a tube exchange catheter. The latter continues into the post-operative recovery-ward.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

48

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Copenhagen, Denmark, 2100
        • Rigshospitalet, section for anaesthesia for ENT and Maxillofacial surgery, section 3071

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients for anaesthesia for surgery in the Head-/neck/ear/nose/throat
  • planned for oral intubation with video-laryngoscopy
  • with risk factors for difficult direct laryngoscopy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with increased secretions in the airway (Pneumonia, bronchitis, productive cough)
  • Patients planned for awake intubation
  • Patients where mask-ventilation is judged to could become impossible
  • Patients where access to the cricothyroid membrane is judged to be difficult or impossible
  • Patients in ASA (american Society of Anaesthesiologists) physical classification status >3
  • Patients who are scheduled for rapid sequence induction (RSI) due to risk of aspiration
  • Patients with stridor
  • Patients with hypoxemia (Saturation < 90 % in room air)
  • Operation duration planned to > 2.5 hours
  • Patients with the need for a nerve-stimulation-tube during surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Tritube
The ultra thin tribute is used used for the ventilation of the patients in this arm
Active Comparator: Standard endotracheal tube
A standard endotracheal tube is used used for the ventilation of the patients in this arm

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of Excellent intubation conditions
Time Frame: 2 hours
Rate of Excellent intubation conditions judged on the scale excellent/good/fair/poor
2 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The rate of interruption by the tube of the view to the vocal cords at any time, to such a degree that it disturbs the intubation
Time Frame: 2 hours
2 hours
The Intubation Difficulty Score (IDS)
Time Frame: 2 hours
The intubation difficulty scale , range 0 to 7, 0 indicates easy intubation, 1 - 5 indicates slight difficulty, 5< indicates moderate to major difficulty
2 hours
Time to intubated
Time Frame: 2 hours
Time from the tube is advanced past the vocal cords until the cuff is inflated in the trachea
2 hours
Time to the patient becomes ventilated via the tube
Time Frame: 2 hours
Time from the tube is advanced past the vocal cords until the cuff is inflated in the trachea and CO2 waveform is observed
2 hours
Number of intubation attempts
Time Frame: 2 hours
one attempt is every-time the tube is advanced past the incisors
2 hours
The rate of succesful intubation with 60 seconds
Time Frame: 1 minute
1 minute
Number of remodellings of the stilette
Time Frame: 2 hours
2 hours
rate of use for "reverse loading" of the tube on the stylet
Time Frame: 2 hours
2 hours
the "percent of glottic opening" , (POGO), Before the tube is inserted
Time Frame: 2 hours
2 hours
the"percent of glottic opening" , POGO, with the tube in place
Time Frame: 2 hors
2 hors
Intubation conditions Strom scale
Time Frame: 2 hours
Direction of the tube-stylet combination excellent/good/poor, easy/fair/difficult. Advancement of the tube-stylet combination excellent/good/poor easy/fair/difficult
2 hours
The surgeons score of the space and working conditions in the mouth/pharynx and larynx after intubation
Time Frame: 2 hours
2 hours
The difference between ET CO2 and arterial blood-gas CO2 after 15 minutes of surgery
Time Frame: 20 minutes
20 minutes
the duration of the Tritube being in the trachea after return of spontaneous ventilation and deflation of the cuff /(Tritube group)
Time Frame: 4 hours
4 hours
The duration of the tube-exchange catheter being in the trachea after its placement / (Tube-exchange-catheter group)
Time Frame: 4 hours
4 hours
The ration of patients who still has the Tritube or the tube-exchange-catheter in place when arriving in the post-operative recovery unit
Time Frame: 4 hours
4 hours
The ration of patients who still has the Tritube or the tube-exchange-catheter in place one hour after arrival in the Post anaesthesia care unit the post-operative recovery unit
Time Frame: 4 hours
4 hours
The patient's satisfaction with having the Tritube or the tube-exchange-catheter in place when being awake in the Post anaesthesia care unit
Time Frame: 4 hours
Visual analog scale from 1-10, 1= no nuisance, 10= unberable
4 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael S Kristensen, MD, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen Denmark

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 12, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 14, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

February 14, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 28, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 31, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • H-18023689 Tritube

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.