Randomised, Controlled Trial of an Individual Deprescribing Intervention for Nursing Homes Residents (OLD-NH-IDeI)

April 28, 2021 updated by: Anne Niquille

Opportunities and Limits to Deprescribing in Nursing Homes: Randomised, Controlled Trial of an Individual Deprescribing Intervention for Nursing Homes Residents.

This study will evaluate the effects of a pharmacist-led, deprescribing-focused medication review on the use of inappropriate medications by nursing home residents

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Nursing home residents are often prescribed inappropriate medication, drugs whose negative effects outweigh potential benefits or which are not useful anymore. Inappropriate medication have been linked with worse health outcomes, hospitalisations and death. Deprescribing, the structured process of withdrawing or tapering inappropriate medications, has been studied as a potential solution to this problem.

In this study, nursing home residents living in institution which are already engaged in a deprescribing process will be randomly allocated to receive a medication review or usual care. The medication review will be performed by the nursing home pharmacist an its results will be discussed with the responsible physicians and nurses to create a deprescribing plan specifically tailored to the needs of the resident.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
62

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Switzerland
    • Vaud
      • Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland, 1011
        • Centre de Pharmacie Communautaire

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Take 5 or more prescribed drugs daily;
  • Reside in the Nursing Home since at least 4 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Physician judges that discussing deprescribing with them risks destabilising them.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Individual Deprescribing Intervention
Participants allocated to the intervention arm will receive the Individual Deprescribing Intervention (pharmacist-led medication review, followed by the creation of a deprescribing plan by the pharmacist, physician and responsible nurse).
Other: Individual Deprescribing Intervention
The pharmacist responsible for the nursing home will perform a medication review (type 3). The results of this review will be discussed with the physician and nurse responsible for this participant, with the goal of creating a personalised deprescribing plan. Once validated by the physician, this plan will be submitted to the participant for approval.
No Intervention: Control
Participants allocated to the control group will receive usual care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Inappropriate Medication at Follow-up
Time Frame: 4 months
Number of inappropriate medications prescribed at follow-up, assessed using the French translation of STOPP v2.
4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Potentially Inappropriate DDDs Prescribed to Participants at Follow-up
Time Frame: 4 months
Appropriateness assessed using the French translation of STOPP v2; DDD defined by WHO.
4 months
Number of Chronic Drugs Prescribed to Participants
Time Frame: 4 months
Number of Chronic Drugs Prescribed to Participants
4 months
Number of Chronic DDDs Prescribed to Participants
Time Frame: 4 months
Number of chronic DDDs prescribed to participants
4 months
Number of New Drugs Prescribed as a Result of the Intervention
Time Frame: 4 months
This outcome was not analysed
4 months
Health-related Quality of Life
Time Frame: 4 months

The EuroQol 5-Dimensions 5-Levels (EQ-5D-5L) tool was used to assess quality of life; this tool includes

  • a visual analog scale, ranging from 0 to 100, 100 indicating "the best health you can imagine" and 0 "the worst health you can imagine". Higher results indicate an higher quality of life.
  • 5 questions, each with 5 possible answers. Using a valuation set, the answers to individual questions were transformed in a numeric index value for each participants, with a maximum of 1 and an infinitely low minimum. Higher values indicates higher perceived health-related quality of life.
4 months
Number of Common Drug-related Complaints at Follow-up
Time Frame: 4 months
Number of common drug-related complaints at follow-up
4 months

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Deaths
Time Frame: 4 months
Number of deaths
4 months
Number of Participants Hospitalized
Time Frame: 4 months
Number of participants hospitalized at any time during the study
4 months
Days Spent in Hospital
Time Frame: 4 months
Average number of days spent in hospital during the study period
4 months
Number of Falls Per Participant
Time Frame: 4 months
Average number of falls during the study period
4 months
Number of Participants Who Fell
Time Frame: 4 months
Number of participants who fell at least once during the study period
4 months
Number of Falls in Participants That Fell at Least Once
Time Frame: 4 months
4 months
Number of Days Spent With Physical Restraints
Time Frame: 4 months
4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Anne Niquille

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Olivier Bugnon, Prof, ISPSO, Universties of Geneva and Lausanne, Switzerland

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 30, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 22, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 22, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 30, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 30, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 31, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 19, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 28, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • OLD-NH-IDeI-2018

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Data are available from the investigators upon reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

10-year availability

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data are available from the investigators upon reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings