Trial Assessing Safety and Efficacy of Gammanorm® in Autoimmune Diseases

March 9, 2021 updated by: Octapharma

A Prospective, Multicenter Observational Trial Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Gammanorm® in Autoimmune Diseases

This observational trial assesses the safety and efficacy of Gammanorm® in autoimmune diseases.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Paris, France, 75651
        • Aphp - Pitie Salpetriere
      • Rouen, France, 76031
        • Chu de Rouen - Bois Guillaume
  • Martinique
      • Fort-de-France, Martinique, 97261
        • CHU de la Martinique- Hopital Pierre Zobda Quitman

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult men and women over 18 prescribed Gammanorm with autoimmune disease or any other off-label use of Gammanorm who are willing to participate in the study

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult man or woman older than 18 years,
  2. Patient with autoimmune disease such as CIDP, MMN, PM, DM, MI, ITP, NAM or any other off-label use of Gammanorm®,
  3. Patient who has a prescription of Gammanorm® treatment for immunomodulation,
  4. Patient accepting to participate in the study by oral consent after having received oral and written information on the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient treated with Gammanorm® for immune substitution, or other authorized use
  2. Patient who refuses to participate in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Patients Receiving Gammanorm®
Drug: Gammanorm
Patients already receiving Gammanorm will be observed over the course of 2 years every 3 months. Gammanorm will be given standard of care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate the safety of Gammanorm® in terms of adverse event rate in patients receiving the off-label treatment in immunomodulation.
Time Frame: 24 months
Evaluate the safety of Gammanorm® in terms of adverse event rate in patients receiving the off-label treatment in immunomodulation.
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
SMOG score
Time Frame: 24 months
For patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, efficacy will be assessed using the SMOG score. SMOG score : Bleeding manifestations are grouped into three major domains: skin (S), visible mucosae (M), and organs (O), with gradation of severity (SMOG). Each bleeding manifestation is assessed at the time of examination. Severity is graded from 0 to 3 or 4, with grade 5 for any fatal bleeding.
24 months
Rankin score
Time Frame: 24 months
For patients with Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), efficacy will be assessed using the Rankin score
24 months
MRC
Time Frame: 24 months
For patients with Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), efficacy will be assessed using the MRC. MRC (Medical research council) scale for testing muscle : The muscle scale grades muscle power on a scale of 0 to 5 in relation to the maximum expected for that muscle (5= Normal power , 0= No contraction visible or palpable).
24 months
ONLS
Time Frame: 24 months
For patients with Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), efficacy will be assessed using the ONLS (overall neuropathy limitations score). Score ONLS (Overall Neuropathy Limitation Scale) : The OLNS focuses on upper and lower limb functions, and consists of a checklist for interviewing patients. It is scored from 0 to 5 on the upper limb section and from 0 to 7 on the lower limb section. A score of 0 indicates no limitations (the ceiling of the scale) and a score of 5 or 7 indicates no purposeful movement.
24 months
Muscular Testings and Myositis Functional Rating Scale
Time Frame: 24 months
For patients with inflammatory myopathies including dermatomyositis (DM), polymyositis (PM), inclusion body myositis (IBM), and autoimmune necrotizing myopathy (AINM), efficacy will be assessed using the muscular testings and myositis functional rating scale
24 months
Evaluate treatment compliance
Time Frame: 24 months
Evaluate treatment compliance in terms of number of infusions per week
24 months
Evaluate reasons for stopping the treatment
Time Frame: 24 months
Evaluate reasons for stopping the treatment by categorizing across the study the reasons subjects stopped treatment.
24 months
Patient satisfaction regarding Gammanorm
Time Frame: 24 months
Evaluate patient satisfaction with use of patient diaries where the patient will complete a questionnaire on Life Quality Index (LQI)
24 months
Patient Quality of Life regarding Gammanorm
Time Frame: 24 months
Evaluate patient quality of life with use of patient diaries where the patient will complete a questionnaire on quality of life (SF-12)
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Octapharma

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 23, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 9, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 9, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 30, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 31, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 4, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 10, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 9, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IMMUNORM

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings