Subsequent Line Gemcitabine and Nivolumab in Treating Participants With Metastatic Small Cell Lung Cancer

July 26, 2023 updated by: Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Phase II Pilot Study of Subsequent Line Gemcitabine and Nivolumab for Advanced SCLC

This phase II pilot trial studies how well gemcitabine and nivolumab work in treating participants with small cell lung cancer that has spread to other parts of the body after other treatments have failed. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Monoclonal antibodies, such as nivolumab, may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Giving second-line gemcitabine and nivolumab may work better in treating participants with small cell lung cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To compare response rate (RR) of gemcitabine and nivolumab (G+N) after 4 cycles (8 weeks) to historical controls treated with nivolumab alone.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To compare median overall survival (OS) of G+N to historical controls treated with nivolumab alone.

II. To compare median progression-free survival (PFS) of G+N to historical controls treated with nivolumab alone.

III. To evaluate for tolerability of G+N at each treatment cycle and then every 8 weeks after treatment is completed.

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:

I. To correlate immunophenotypic changes among lymphocytes (quantitative measurements of CD4 and CD8 T-cells) with radiographic response and overall survival before treatment, after treatment and between 8-12 weeks after treatment.

II. Among those patients with tumor mutation burden (TMB) status available, to describe the association between TMB (low, medium, or high) and RR, OS, and PFS.

III. Assess the patient perspective of symptomatic adverse events using self-reported items from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Patient Reported Outcomes-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).

OUTLINE:

Participants receive gemcitabine intravenously (IV) over 30 minutes and nivolumab IV over 60 minutes on day 1. Treatment repeats every 2 weeks for up to 4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

After completion of study treatment, participants are followed up at 30 days, 6-10 weeks, and every 8 weeks thereafter.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
14

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients must have histologically or cytologically confirmed incurable SCLC and have had prior treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy. High-grade neuroendocrine tumors that are suspected to be of bronchopulmonary origin can be enrolled if they have had prior treatment with a SCLC chemotherapy regimen (e.g. platinum plus etoposide).
  • Patients should not be demonstrating end-organ damage due to rapid progression of disease based on the most recent assessment of the treating physician.
  • Patients must have radiographically measurable metastatic disease by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2.
  • Absolute neutrophil count >= 1,500/mcL.
  • Platelets >= 100,000/mcL.
  • Chemotherapy agents are known to be teratogenic, therefore women of child-bearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control) prior to study entry and for the duration of study participation. Should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while participating in this study, she should inform her treating physician immediately.
  • Ability to understand and the willingness to sign an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved informed consent document.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have previously received either gemcitabine or an immune checkpoint inhibitor can be enrolled.
  • Emergent need for palliative radiation.
  • Patients may not be receiving any other investigational agents for the treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer.
  • History of allergic reaction to gemcitabine.
  • Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements.
  • Pregnant women are excluded from this study because of the potential for teratogenic or abortifacient effects with chemotherapy. Because there is an unknown but potential risk for adverse events in nursing infants secondary to treatment of the mother with chemotherapy, breastfeeding should be discontinued.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Treatment (gemcitabine, nivolumab)
Participants receive gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes and nivolumab IV over 60 minutes on day 1. Treatment repeats every 2 weeks for up to 4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
Biological: Nivolumab
Given IV
Other Names:
  • BMS-936558
  • MDX-1106
  • NIVO
  • ONO-4538
  • Opdivo
Drug: Gemcitabine
Given IV
Other Names:
  • dFdCyd
  • dFdC
  • Difluorodeoxycytidine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Positive Responses to Therapy Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks

Objective RR (complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]) will be compared between this study sample and a historical benchmark value of 10%. For this comparison we will use a one-sample test of proportion.

  • Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions.
  • Partial Response (PR): Decrease by ≥ 30% in sum of longest diameter of target lesions.
  • Stable Disease (SD): Not meeting criteria for CR, PR, or PD.
  • Progressive Disease (PD): Increase by ≥ 20% in sum of longest diameter of target lesions or the appearance of one or more new lesions.

The response in non-target lesions is defined as follows:

  • Complete Response (CR): Complete disappearance of all non-target lesions.
  • Stable Disease (SD): Persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s).
  • Progressive Disease (PD): Appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
Up to 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival (OS) - Number of Participants
Time Frame: Duration of time from the start of treatment to date of death, assessed up to 2 years
OS will be estimated using standard Kaplan Meier survival analysis methods.
Duration of time from the start of treatment to date of death, assessed up to 2 years
Overall Survival (OS) - Months
Time Frame: Duration of time from the start of treatment to date of death, assessed up to 2 years
A median value (months) of overall survival will be estimated using standard Kaplan Meier survival analysis methods.
Duration of time from the start of treatment to date of death, assessed up to 2 years
Progression-free Survival (PFS) - Number of Participants
Time Frame: Duration of time from the start of treatment to the time of investigator assessed progression or death, assessed up to 2 years
Progression-free survival will be estimated using standard Kaplan Meier survival analysis methods. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) is defined as the duration of time from the start of treatment to the time of investigator assessed progression or death. Progressive Disease (PD): Increase by ≥ 20% in sum of longest diameter of target lesions or the appearance of one or more new lesions
Duration of time from the start of treatment to the time of investigator assessed progression or death, assessed up to 2 years
Progression-free Survival (PFS) - Months
Time Frame: Duration of time from the start of treatment to the time of investigator assessed progression or death, assessed up to 2 years
A median value (months) of progressive-free survival will be estimated using standard Kaplan Meier survival analysis methods. Progressive Disease (PD): Increase by ≥ 20% in sum of longest diameter of target lesions or the appearance of one or more new lesions
Duration of time from the start of treatment to the time of investigator assessed progression or death, assessed up to 2 years
Number of Adverse Events
Time Frame: Up to 2 years
Toxicity rates will be estimated by responder status and presented overall and by body site per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0
Up to 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Thomas W. Lycan, Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 7, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 7, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 3, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 5, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 5, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 7, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 2, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 26, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB00051024
  • P30CA012197 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • NCI-2018-01803 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))
  • CCCWFU 62418 (Other Identifier: Wake Forest University Health Sciences)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Nivolumab

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings