Comparison of Computer-Assisted Navigation and Conventional Instrumentation for Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty
Comparison of Computer-Assisted Navigation and Conventional Instrumentation for Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: The Functional Outcome of Mid-Term Follow-up Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Pizi, Taiwan, 613
- Sports Medicine Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- The patients who were scheduled to undergo staged bilateral TKA and randomly assigned to receive CAS TKA in one limb and conventional TKA in the other at the 8-year follow-up.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Computer-Assisted Navigation TKA
the patients who were received CAS TKA in one limb
|
TKAs were performed using the image-free CAS navigation system VectorVision
|
|
Conventional TKA
the patients who were received conventional TKA in one limb
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
International Knee Society (IKS)
Time Frame: up to 8-year follow-up
|
To assess the functional outcome of TKA by self-explanatory questionnaire
|
up to 8-year follow-up
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Radiographic evaluation
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months after operation
|
Standard anteroposterior, lateral radiographs of the knee and standing long-leg radiographs of the lower extremity were obtained pre- and postoperatively.
The lower extremities were fully extended so that the tibial tuberosities were facing forward and the lateral malleoli were 15 cm apart to ensure that the tibia was vertical and facing forward with minimal rotation.
The X-ray beam (20-25 mA/s; 80-85 kV) was centered at the knee joint level at a distance of 120-140 cm.Radiographic data included the mechanical axis angle and the four component alignments described by Ewald: the femoral valgus (FV) angle; tibial valgus angle (TV); femoral flexion (FF) angle; and tibial flexion angle (TF)
|
Baseline and 3 months after operation
|
|
Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, 8-year follow-up
|
To assess the functional outcome of TKA by self-explanatory questionnaire
|
Baseline, 8-year follow-up
|
|
Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
Time Frame: Baseline, 8-year follow-up
|
To assess the functional outcome of TKA by self-explanatory questionnaire
|
Baseline, 8-year follow-up
|
|
Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey
Time Frame: Baseline, 8-year follow-up
|
To assess the functional outcome of TKA by self-explanatory questionnaire
|
Baseline, 8-year follow-up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Robert Wen-Wei HSU, MD, Sports Medicine Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CORPG6G0251
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.