QoR-9 AS predicTor of postopErative Complications
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Bavaria
-
München, Bavaria, Germany, 81675
- Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
3854 patients undergoing surgery at Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University who have good knowledge of German Language.
Surgical procedures include all departments except cardiac surgery.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- written informed consent
- undergoing non-cardiac surgery
- good knowledge of German language
Exclusion Criteria:
- blind
- out-patient
- pregnant
- psychiatric disturbance that preclude cooperation
- decline to participate
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Postoperative Complications evaluated by Clavien- Dindo Score
Time Frame: Date of Surgery till Discharge from Hospital (approximately 30 days)
|
Nine domains are evaluated: Pulmonary, infectious, renal, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, neurological, wound, haematological and pain.
Each domain is graded between grade I and V (death of a patient).
|
Date of Surgery till Discharge from Hospital (approximately 30 days)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
hospital mortality
Time Frame: Date of Surgery till Discharge from Hospital (approximately 30 days)
|
Rate of Mortality among study patients
|
Date of Surgery till Discharge from Hospital (approximately 30 days)
|
|
6-month mortality
Time Frame: 6 month after date of surgery
|
Mortality among patients 6 months after surgery
|
6 month after date of surgery
|
|
Superiority of QoR-9 questionnaire against common Outcome Score
Time Frame: Date of surgery until 6 month follow-up
|
Comparison of different risk estimates and Outcome Scores
|
Date of surgery until 6 month follow-up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.
- Jammer I, Wickboldt N, Sander M, Smith A, Schultz MJ, Pelosi P, Leva B, Rhodes A, Hoeft A, Walder B, Chew MS, Pearse RM; European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM); European Society of Anaesthesiology; European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Standards for definitions and use of outcome measures for clinical effectiveness research in perioperative medicine: European Perioperative Clinical Outcome (EPCO) definitions: a statement from the ESA-ESICM joint taskforce on perioperative outcome measures. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Feb;32(2):88-105. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000118.
- Anetsberger A, Blobner M, Krautheim V, Umgelter K, Schmid S, Jungwirth B. Self-Reported, Structured Measures of Recovery to Detect Postoperative Morbidity. PLoS One. 2015 Jul 24;10(7):e0133871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133871. eCollection 2015.
- Myles PS, Grocott MP, Boney O, Moonesinghe SR; COMPAC-StEP Group. Standardizing end points in perioperative trials: towards a core and extended outcome set. Br J Anaesth. 2016 May;116(5):586-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew066. No abstract available.
- Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Variation in hospital mortality associated with inpatient surgery. N Engl J Med. 2009 Oct 1;361(14):1368-75. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0903048.
- Regenbogen SE, Ehrenfeld JM, Lipsitz SR, Greenberg CC, Hutter MM, Gawande AA. Utility of the surgical apgar score: validation in 4119 patients. Arch Surg. 2009 Jan;144(1):30-6; discussion 37. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2008.504.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- QoR- ASPECT
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.