Measuring Postoperative Mobility, Gait Symmetry and Feedback Following TJA

November 17, 2025 updated by: Christopher Pelt, University of Utah

Measuring Postoperative Mobility, Gait Symmetry and Feedback With New Technology Following Total Joint Arthroplasty

The objectives of this study are:

  1. The investigators plan to evaluate and validate the use of a novel wireless insole device (Loadsol) that provides real-time biofeedback on post-operative mobility and weight bearing following total joint arthroplasty.
  2. The investigators plan to utilize the wireless insole device to determine if biofeedback is sufficient for improving gait symmetry following total joint arthroplasty.
  3. The investigators plan to determine if there is a correlation between patient reported outcomes and measured postoperative weight bearing.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

In orthopaedic and trauma surgery post-operative mobility is very important. Six-month mortality and patient satisfaction has been associated with mobility. Elderly patients may suffer from severe complications caused by immobility due to a high prevalence of comorbidities.

Measuring postoperative mobility has primarily been based on advanced technology and complicated gait laboratories (treadmill, force plate, videoanalysis). The recent introduction of mobile insole force devices, such as the pedoped loadsol® (Novel) may allow for a cost-effective and clinically relevant use of providing biofeedback.

Using video analysis to evaluate the insole device will allow for measurements in realistic situations like walking stairs, stand up from a chair, sit down, turning and walking. The investigators had previously completed this in the lab setting and further the feedback mode of the loadsol will be used for training the patients in terms of symmetry after a total knee replacement.

This study may have an important influence on the aftercare of the investigators patients. Determining the postoperative mobility and evaluating gait analysis in real time will allow the investigators to compare between different operative approaches, operative techniques, Implants and more. If the feedback mode is working as expected the investigators might use it in the close future in the investigators standard aftercare for all patients.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
58

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84108
        • University of Utah Orthopaedic Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who plan or recently underwent (up to 8 weeks postoperatively) primary total joint arthroplasty

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Planned or recently underwent (up to 8 weeks postoperatively) primary total joint arthroplasty
  • Free walking before surgery, no devices needed
  • Age >/=18 years
  • Preoperative outcomes scores (PF CAT, PROMIS Global Health, KOOS JR)
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Index procedure is a revision total joint arthroplasty
  • Total knee or hip arthroplasty on the contralateral side within 1 one year of index procedure
  • Severe medical comorbidity (ASA>/=3)
  • Participant is planning TJA on another joint within next 12 months
  • Significant symptoms on contralateral knee/hip/ankle that could impede performance on study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Peak Vertical Ground Reaction Forces (vGRF)
Time Frame: 6-weeks
Gait analysis of vertical ground reaction forces generated while performing routine exercises
6-weeks
Peak Vertical Ground Reaction Forces (vGRF)
Time Frame: 6-months
Gait analysis of vertical ground reaction forces generated while performing
6-months
Peak Vertical Ground Reaction Forces (vGRF)
Time Frame: 12-months
Gait analysis of vertical ground reaction forces generated while performing
12-months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Utah

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Christopher Pelt, MD, University of Utah

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 5, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 8, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 8, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 12, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 13, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 17, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 20, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 17, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 110935

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings