Study of Rapastinel as Monotherapy in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)

July 10, 2020 updated by: Naurex, Inc, an affiliate of Allergan plc

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study of Rapastinel as Monotherapy in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder

The study will evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of 225 milligrams (mg) and 450 milligrams (mg) of Rapastinel, compared to placebo in participants with major depressive disorder (MDD).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Hungary
      • Gyongyos, Hungary, 3200
        • Bugát Pál Hospital, Clinexpert
  • Japan
      • Ichigayatamachi, Japan, 162-0843
        • Himorogi Psychiatric Institute
      • Kawasaki-shi, Japan, 214-0014
        • Kishiro Mental Clinic
      • Kobe-shi, Japan, 651-0097
        • Tatsuta Clinic
      • Kumamoto-shi, Japan, 861-8002
        • Medical corporation Sato-Kai Yuge Hospital
      • Kyoto-shi, Japan, 616-8421
        • Sagaarashiyama-Tanaka Clinic
      • Meguro-ku, Japan, 152-0012
        • Senzoku Psychosomatic Medicine Clinic
      • Sapporo-shi, Japan, 003-0003
        • Higashi Sapporo Mental Clinic
      • Setagaya-ku, Japan, 154-0004
        • Sangenjaya Neurology- Psychosomatic Clinic
      • Shibuya-ku, Japan, 151-0051
        • Yoyogi Mental Clinic
      • Shibuya-ku, Japan, 151-0053
        • Maynds Tower Mental Clinic
      • Shinagawa-ku, Japan, 141-0032
        • Himeno Tomomi Clinic
      • Shinjuku-ku, Japan, 169-0073
        • Shinjuku Research Park Clinic
      • Toshima-ku, Japan, 170-0002
        • Ohwa Mental Clinic
      • Toyoake-city, Japan, 470-1168
        • Okehazama Hospital Fujita Kokoro Care Center
      • Yokohama-shi, Japan, 231-0015
        • Yokohama Onoecho Clinic
  • Poland
      • Lublin, Poland, 20-109
        • Centrum Medyczne Luxmed Sp.z o.o.
  • Russian Federation
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 115522
        • Federal State Budgetary Research Institution "Mental Health Science Center"
      • Yaroslavl, Russian Federation, 150003
        • Yaroslavl Regional Psychiatric Hospital
  • Slovakia
      • Bratislava, Slovakia, 82007
        • MENTUM, s.r.o.
      • Bratislava, Slovakia, 85101
        • Vavrusova Consulting s.r.o. Neštátna Psychiatrická ambulancia
      • Liptovsky Mikulas, Slovakia, 03123
        • Liptovska Nemocnica S Poliklinikou Mudr. Ivana Stodolu Liptovsky Mikulas
      • Rimavska Sobota, Slovakia, 97901
        • PsychoLine s.r.o.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 71 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria for MDD
  • Current major depressive episode of at least 8 weeks and not exceeding 18 months in duration at Visit 1
  • Treatment naive in the current episode or have inadequate response to 1-3 antidepressant therapies given at adequate dose and duration in the current episode
  • If female of childbearing potential, have a negative serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) pregnancy test

Exclusion Criteria:

  • DSM-5-based diagnosis of any disorder other than MDD that was the primary focus of treatment within 6 months before Visit 1

  • Lifetime history of meeting DSM-5 criteria for:

    1. Schizophrenia spectrum or other psychotic disorder
    2. Bipolar or related disorder
    3. Major neurocognitive disorder
    4. Neurodevelopmental disorder of greater than mild severity or of a severity that impacts the participant's ability to consent, follow study directions, or otherwise safely participate in the study
    5. Dissociative disorder
    6. Posttraumatic stress disorder
    7. MDD with psychotic features
  • Significant suicide risk, as judged by the investigator

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Rapastinel 450mg
Rapastinel (prefilled syringe, weekly intravenous IV administration).
Drug: Rapastinel
Rapastinel (prefilled syringe, weekly intravenous IV administration).
Experimental: Rapastinel 225mg
Rapastinel (prefilled syringe, weekly intravenous IV administration).
Drug: Rapastinel
Rapastinel (prefilled syringe, weekly intravenous IV administration).
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo (prefilled syringe, weekly IV administration).
Drug: Placebo
Placebo (prefilled syringe, weekly IV administration).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline on Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at End of Double-blind Treatment (End of Week 6).
Time Frame: Baseline to end of Week 6
The MADRS is a clinician-rated scale to assess depressive symptomatology during the preceding week. Participants are rated on 10 items (feelings of sadness, lassitude, pessimism, inner tension, suicidality, reduced sleep or appetite, difficulty concentrating, and a lack of interest) each on a 7-point scale from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (symptoms of maximum severity). The total score ranges from 0 to 60 with a higher score indicating more depression. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Baseline to end of Week 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in MADRS Total Score at 1 Day After First Dose of Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline to 1 Day post-first dose
The MADRS is a clinician-rated scale to assess depressive symptomatology during the preceding week. Participants are rated on 10 items (feelings of sadness, lassitude, pessimism, inner tension, suicidality, reduced sleep or appetite, difficulty concentrating, and a lack of interest) each on a 7-point scale from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (symptoms of maximum severity). The total score ranges from 0 to 60 with a higher score indicating more depression. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Baseline to 1 Day post-first dose

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Naurex, Inc, an affiliate of Allergan plc

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 30, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 11, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 11, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 17, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 17, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 18, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 28, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 10, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • RAP-MD-30
  • 2018-000060-29 (EudraCT Number)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings