Video Balance-based Exercise in Persons With Stroke
Effect of Interactive Video Balance-based Exercise in Persons With Stroke
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Taipei, Taiwan
- Taipei Medical University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients present with unilateral hemiplegia caused by a first-ever stroke
- cognitive ability is sufficient to understand the nature of study (Mini-Mental State Examination score>=23)
- medical and psychological condition stable
Exclusion Criteria:
- patients having severe spasticity (Modified Ashworth scale > 3)
- severe hearing or eye problem
- intake of drugs or other medical condition that can affect function or can't tolerate rehabilitation
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Interactive video balance-based exercise
Fifteen participants in group A will undergo 30 minutes a day and 3 days a week interactive video balance-based exercise intervention for four weeks.
|
Interactive video balance-based exercise :10 minutes of warm up exercise, 30 minutes of Interactive video balance-based exercise and 5 minutes of cool down exercise.
|
|
Active Comparator: Conventional physiotherapy
Another 15 participants allocated to the group B will receive 30 minutes a day and 3 days a week conventional rehabilitation for four weeks.
|
conventional physiotherapy: 10 minutes of warm up exercise, 30 minutes conventional physiotherapy and 5 minutes of cool down exercise.
Conventional physiotherapy contains rolling, sitting, balance exercise, standing, overground walking, facilitation of the paretic limbs, and so on.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change of Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Time Frame: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in both groups
|
Participants perform a series of 14 functional balance tasks, such as maintaining a quiet stance, sitting-to-stand, shifting weight and reaching, turning in place, standing on one leg, and maintaining a tandem stance.
|
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in both groups
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change of Time Up Go test (TUG)
Time Frame: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in both groups
|
The TUG test is a quick, reliable, valid, and accurate method commonly used to test dynamic stability and functional mobility.
In the test, participants stand up from a 46-cm-high armchair with back support, walk straight for 3 m, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down as quickly and safely as possible.
|
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in both groups
|
|
Change of Modified Falls Efficacy Scale (MFES)
Time Frame: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in both groups
|
The MFES is a 14-item rating scale questionnaire that contains the original 10-activity Falls Efficacy Scale and 4 additional activities.
It is used to assess confidence of not falling while performing daily activities.
|
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in both groups
|
|
Change of Motricity Index (MI)
Time Frame: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in both groups
|
The MI reflects general muscle strength in persons with stroke.
|
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in both groups
|
|
Change of Functional Ambulation Category (FAC)
Time Frame: Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in both groups
|
The FAC is based on the required level of assistance during walking in individuals with stroke.
|
Measurement before and after intervention ( week 0 and at the end of week 4) in both groups
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- N201708024
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.