Comparison of Three Methods for NG Tube Placement (NG)
Comparison of Three Methods for NG Tube Placement in Intubated Patients in the Emergency Department During 2016-2018
Background and Aim: Tubular feeding is used, in patients who cannot take food through their mouths, but the digestive system has the ability to digest food. This method is safe and affordable for the patient and results in maintaining the function of the digestive system and reducing the risk of infection and sepsis. The purpose of this study was to compare the three methods of the NG tube placement in intubated patients in the emergency department of university-affiliated hospitals of Isfahan from2016 to 2018.
Materials and Methods: This study was a randomized and prospective clinical trial. The statistical population of this study was all patients who had been referred to the emergency department of Al-Zahra and Ayatollah Kashani hospitals in Isfahan between2016and2018. The sample size was 25 in each group, and in total 75 subjects. The first group was NG tube insertion by the conventional method, the second group was using brake cable and the third group was embeddedby highwayman's hitch or draw hitch, using a silk thread. For all patients, demographic characteristics and possible complications were recorded. Finally, the data were analyzed using SPSS20 software at two statistical levels of descriptive and inferential.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Isfahan, Iran, Islamic Republic of, 8138938728
- Al-Zahra University Hospital
-
Isfahan, Iran, Islamic Republic of, 8194856781
- Mehdi Nasr Isfahani
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- all intubated patients, referred to the emergency department
Exclusion Criteria:
- the presence of symptoms of skull base fracture,
- bleeding disorders and coagulopathies,
- maxillofacial trauma, which led to deformity and impairment of NG tube,
- upper respiratory tract diseases and anomalies,
- nasal congestion and nostril stenosis,
- esophageal disorder (esophageal stenosis and esophageal varicose vein),
- and a history of head and neck radiotherapy.
- Patients who had been intubated in other centers and being referred to these two centers were also excluded.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Conventional r blinded
the participants were allocated to have NG tube inserted in a conventional or blind method.
|
a feeding tube called naso-gastric or NG tube were inserted through nostril inside the stomach randomly by one of three methods mentioned earlier
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Brake cable
the participants were assigned to have NG tube inserted by use of a bike brake cable as a guide wire.
|
a feeding tube called naso-gastric or NG tube were inserted through nostril inside the stomach randomly by one of three methods mentioned earlier
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: High way man's hitch
they were selected to have NG tube inserted by use of silk thread knot.
|
a feeding tube called naso-gastric or NG tube were inserted through nostril inside the stomach randomly by one of three methods mentioned earlier
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
success rate
Time Frame: Intraoperative (time from entry of the NG tube through nostril til entering inside the stomach or whenever the operator declared.)
|
success rate was defined as successfully inserted NG tube inside the stomach
|
Intraoperative (time from entry of the NG tube through nostril til entering inside the stomach or whenever the operator declared.)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
procedure duration
Time Frame: Intraoperative (from nostril entry til sromach entry or operatoe declaration as the end of procedure)
|
it was measured as the total time from start of the procedure til the entry of the tube inside the stomach.
|
Intraoperative (from nostril entry til sromach entry or operatoe declaration as the end of procedure)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 396780
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.