Effectiveness of a Robot Assisted Tenodeis-grip Neurorehabilitation
Effectiveness of a Robot Assisted Tenodeis-grip Neurorehabilitation for Upper Extremity Function of Stroke Patients
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Tainan, Taiwan, 704
- National Cheng-Kung University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Clinical diagnosis of stroke with unilateral side involved;
- Stroke at least 7 days before the start of the first assessment session;
- A score of Mini-mental state examination greater than 24 for proving higher mental function;
- Premorbid right-handedness.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Uncontrolled hypertension;
- Major cognitive-perceptual deficit;
- Other brain disease.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Robot-assisted training
The participants will receive 20 minutes of robot assisted tenodesis-grip therapy, followed by 20 minutes of regular motor task specific training in each treatment session.
|
motor task specific training
|
|
Active Comparator: Traditional occupational therapy
The participants will receive 20 minutes of traditional occupational therapy (sensorimotor facilitation techniques, such as: Rood, Bobath and propriocetive-neuromuscular-facilitation), followed by 20 minutes of motor task specific training in each treatment session.
|
motor task specific training
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in the result of Box and blocks test
Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks and 18 weeks
|
The score is the number of blocks carried from one box to the other in one minute.
Higher values represent a better outcome.
|
baseline, 6 weeks and 18 weeks
|
|
Change in the result of Semmes-Weinstein monofilament (SWM) test
Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks and 18 weeks
|
The Semmes-Weinstein monofilamenttest examines the cutaneous pressure threshold, range from 1.65-6.65.
Higher values represent a worse outcome.
|
baseline, 6 weeks and 18 weeks
|
|
Change in the result of Fugl-Meyer assessment for UE motor function
Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks and 18 weeks
|
Each item is rated on a three-point ordinal scale (2 points for the detail being performed completely, 1 point for the detail being performed partially, and 0 for the detail not being performed).
The maximum motor performance score is 66 points for the upper extremity.completely, 1 point for the detail being performed partially, and 0 for the detail not being performed).
The maximum motor performance score is 66 points for the upper extremity.
|
baseline, 6 weeks and 18 weeks
|
|
Change in the result of Modified Ashworth scale (MAS)
Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks and 18 weeks
|
Muscle tone is defined by the resistance of a muscle being stretched without resistance.
|
baseline, 6 weeks and 18 weeks
|
|
Change in the result of Motor Activity Log
Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks and 18 weeks
|
MAL is a structured interview with testing sensitivity used to examine how much (amount of use, AOU) and how well (quality of movement, QOM) the subject uses their more-affected arm.
For the 30 items MAL, each item is scored on a 0-5-ordinal scale.
|
baseline, 6 weeks and 18 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical global impression scale
Time Frame: post-intervention (week 6)
|
Self-reported improvement over the treatment period,.
The scale, rated from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), is as the indicator for determining perceptible change of the patients for assisted tenodeis-grip robot system.
|
post-intervention (week 6)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- B-BR-106-074-T
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.