The Effectiveness of Mini-fluid Challenge in Predicting Fluid Responsiveness During Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Tzu Jung Wei
- Phone Number: +886972653416
- Email: sa46222@gmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: National Taiwan University Hospital
Study Locations
-
-
-
Taipei, Taiwan, 100
- Recruiting
- National Taiwan University Hospital
-
Contact:
- Wu Chun-Yu, Ph.D.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients receiving scheduled video assisted thoracic surgery
- BMI 18.5~30 kg.m-2
Exclusion Criteria:
- age younger then 20 yrs or elder than 80 yrs
- pregnant women
- patients in intensive care units
- patients with the underlying disease including respiratory failure(FEV1/FVC < 70 % and FEV1 < 50%), heart failure(NYHA score =III、IV), kidney failure(eGFR< 60 ml.min-1.1.73m-2), liver failure
- patients with ongoing infection
- patient allergic to voluven
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intubated group
Patient in this group will receive general anesthesia with endotracheal tube intubation to perform one lung ventilation.
Patient will be paralyzed and controlled ventilation will be implied.
|
Mini-fluid challenge with crystalloid 250 ml will be given to patients first.
After observation of hemodynamic parameters, further fluid challenge will be given for response observation.
|
|
Experimental: Non-intubated group
Patient in this group will receive general anesthesia with laryngeal mask insertion.
Patients in this group will not be paralyzed and keep spontaneous breathing to maintain one lung ventilation.
|
Mini-fluid challenge with crystalloid 250 ml will be given to patients first.
After observation of hemodynamic parameters, further fluid challenge will be given for response observation.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change of blood pressure after fluid loading
Time Frame: 3 hours
|
Interpretate the correlation of mini-fluid challenge and conventional fluid challenge
|
3 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change of cardiac index after fluid loading
Time Frame: 3 hours
|
Interpretate the correlation of mini-fluid challenge and conventional fluid challenge
|
3 hours
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
stroke volume variation(SVV)
Time Frame: 3 hours
|
Interpretate the correlation of mini-fluid challenge and conventional fluid challenge
|
3 hours
|
|
stroke volume (SV)
Time Frame: 3 hours
|
Interpretate the correlation of mini-fluid challenge and conventional fluid challenge
|
3 hours
|
|
stroke volume index(SVI)
Time Frame: 3 hours
|
Interpretate the correlation of mini-fluid challenge and conventional fluid challenge
|
3 hours
|
|
plethysmographic variation index(PVI)
Time Frame: 3 hours
|
Interpretate the correlation of mini-fluid challenge and conventional fluid challenge
|
3 hours
|
|
pulse pressure variation(PPV)
Time Frame: 3 hours
|
Interpretate the correlation of mini-fluid challenge and conventional fluid challenge
|
3 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Cavallaro F, Sandroni C, Antonelli M. Functional hemodynamic monitoring and dynamic indices of fluid responsiveness. Minerva Anestesiol. 2008 Apr;74(4):123-35. Epub 2008 Jan 24.
- Evans RG, Naidu B. Does a conservative fluid management strategy in the perioperative management of lung resection patients reduce the risk of acute lung injury? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012 Sep;15(3):498-504. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs175. Epub 2012 May 22.
- Vincent JL. "Let's give some fluid and see what happens" versus the "mini-fluid challenge". Anesthesiology. 2011 Sep;115(3):455-6. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318229a521. No abstract available.
- Wyffels PA, Sergeant P, Wouters PF. The value of pulse pressure and stroke volume variation as predictors of fluid responsiveness during open chest surgery. Anaesthesia. 2010 Jul;65(7):704-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06371.x. Epub 2010 May 6.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 201807009RINC
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.