FAM-CAM Translation and Validation Into German (TRAVAGE-FAM)
Translation and Validation of the Family Confusion Assessment Method (FAM-CAM) Into German for the Detection of Delirium in Critically Ill Patients
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Bavaria
-
Munich, Bavaria, Germany, 81675
- Klinikum rechts der Isar der TUM
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Intensive Care Stay ≥ 48 hours
- Expected RASS ≥ 3
- Communication possible in German (minimum of C1 level of Common European Framework of Reference for Languages)
Exclusion Criteria:
- preexisting psychosis, dementia or depression
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Critical Ill Patients
Critically ill patients with a RASS ≥ 3. FAM-CAM and CAM-ICU will be administered.
|
Family Confusion Assessment Method
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Cohen's Kappa Coefficient
Time Frame: During a family visit which is not the first while treated in intensive care (an median of 10 days)
|
Cohen's Kappa coefficient comparing the Family Confusion Assessment Method and the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Unit
|
During a family visit which is not the first while treated in intensive care (an median of 10 days)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Specificity of FAM-CAM
Time Frame: During a family visit which is not the first while treated in intensive care (an median of 10 days)
|
Specificity of the Family Confusion Assessment Method in critically ill patients to detect Delirium
|
During a family visit which is not the first while treated in intensive care (an median of 10 days)
|
|
Sensitivity of FAM-CAM
Time Frame: During a family visit which is not the first while treated in intensive care (an median of 10 days)
|
Sensitivity of the Family Confusion Assessment Method in critically ill patients to detect Delirium
|
During a family visit which is not the first while treated in intensive care (an median of 10 days)
|
|
NPV of FAM-CAM
Time Frame: During a family visit which is not the first while treated in intensive care (an median of 10 days)
|
Negative Predictive Value of the Family Confusion Assessment Method in critically ill patients to detect Delirium
|
During a family visit which is not the first while treated in intensive care (an median of 10 days)
|
|
PPV of FAM-CAM
Time Frame: During a family visit which is not the first while treated in intensive care (an median of 10 days)
|
Positive Predictive Value of the Family Confusion Assessment Method in critically ill patients to detect Delirium
|
During a family visit which is not the first while treated in intensive care (an median of 10 days)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Stefan J Schaller, MD, Klinikum rechts der Isar der TUM
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Flanagan NM, Spencer G. Informal caregivers and detection of delirium in postacute care: a correlational study of the confusion assessment method (CAM), confusion assessment method-family assessment method (CAM-FAM) and DSM-IV criteria. Int J Older People Nurs. 2016 Sep;11(3):176-83. doi: 10.1111/opn.12106. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
- Aya AGM, Pouchain PH, Thomas H, Ripart J, Cuvillon P. Incidence of postoperative delirium in elderly ambulatory patients: A prospective evaluation using the FAM-CAM instrument. J Clin Anesth. 2019 Mar;53:35-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.09.034. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
- Steis MR, Evans L, Hirschman KB, Hanlon A, Fick DM, Flanagan N, Inouye SK. Screening for delirium using family caregivers: convergent validity of the Family Confusion Assessment Method and interviewer-rated Confusion Assessment Method. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Nov;60(11):2121-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04200.x. Epub 2012 Oct 5.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- TRAVAGE-FAM
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.