Implementing Pathways to Improve Pediatric Asthma Care (PIPA)

March 7, 2022 updated by: University of California, San Francisco

The PIPA Study (Pathways for Improving Pediatric Asthma Care): A Cluster Randomized Trial

Background:

Asthma affects nearly 10% of American children, and is a leading cause of pediatric emergency visits and hospitalizations. Clinical pathways are operational versions of practice guidelines aimed at the hospital management of common illnesses. Single-site studies of pediatric asthma pathways have shown significant improvements in quality of care.

Primary Objective:

To evaluate the effectiveness of clinical pathways for improving quality of care for children with asthma in a diverse, national sample of emergency department (ED) and hospital settings.

Primary Endpoints:

  1. Emergency Department: The proportion of eligible children who receive systemic steroids within 60 minutes of ED arrival
  2. Inpatient/Hospital: Mean length of hospital stay

Study Design:

This project will be implemented through an established quality improvement collaborative of hospitals across the United States, the Value in Inpatient Pediatrics Network (part of the American Academy of Pediatrics). A cluster randomized design will be employed. Group 1 hospitals will receive a multifaceted implementation strategy that includes: 1) a pathway implementation toolkit, 2) local multidisciplinary champions in the ED and inpatient settings, 3) audit and feedback, 4) educational seminars, and 5) practice facilitation (via teleconference). Group 2 will receive the same intervention with the addition of a mobile app pathway tool.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

303

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94158
        • University of California

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Participant/Local champion Eligibility Criteria:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Working as a physician at the study site

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Patient/child eligibility criteria:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 2-17 years
  • Primary diagnosis of asthma

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Transferred in from another inpatient facility
  • Presence of a chronic medical condition that precludes pathway use

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pathway Intervention 1
Hospitals randomized to group 1 receive PIPA Intervention Bundle 1.

The PIPA intervention bundle 1 includes:

  1. Pathway Implementation Toolkit
  2. Local Multidisciplinary Champions
  3. Audit and Feedback
  4. Educational Seminars/Webinars
  5. Practice Facilitation
Experimental: Pathway Intervention 2
Hospitals randomized to group 2 receive PIPA Intervention Bundle 2, which adds a mobile app.

The PIPA intervention bundle 2 includes:

  1. Pathway Implementation Toolkit
  2. Local Multidisciplinary Champions
  3. Audit and Feedback
  4. Educational Seminars/Webinars
  5. Practice Facilitation
  6. Mobile App
No Intervention: Control
Hospitals are in the control arm (usual care) after January 2017 until active implementation begins, which includes 3-6 months of implementation preparation (identifying local multidisciplinary champions, educational sessions/webinars for local champions, one teleconference with an external practice facilitator).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Hospital/Inpatient: Mean length of hospital stay
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Emergency Department: Proportion of eligible children who receive systemic steroids within 60 minutes of ED arrival
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Hospital/Inpatient: Proportion of children with administration of bronchodilator via metered-dose inhaler early in hospitalization
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Hospital/Inpatient: Proportion of children screened for secondhand tobacco smoke exposure
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Hospital/Inpatient: Proportion of children who screen positive for secondhand tobacco smoke exposure whose caregivers are referred to smoking cessation resources
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Hospital/Inpatient: Proportion of children prescribed antibiotics at hospital discharge
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Hospital/Inpatient: Proportion of children with emergency department visits or readmissions to the hospital within 7 days
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Hospital/Inpatient: Proportion of children transferred to a higher level of care
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Emergency Department: Proportion of children who get an asthma exacerbation severity assessment at ED triage
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Emergency Department: Proportion of children who have chest radiographs performed
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Emergency Department: Proportion of children admitted to the hospital
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Emergency Department: Proportion of children transferred to a higher level of care
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Emergency Department: Mean length of emergency department stay
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sunitha V Kaiser, MD MSc, University of California, San Francisco

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 7, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 9, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 17 KA 01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.