Serum Calcium to Phosphorous (Ca/P) Ratio in the Diagnosis of Ca-P Metabolism Disorders: a Multicentre Study

February 8, 2021 updated by: Vincenzo Rochira, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena
Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) and Hypoparathyroidism (HP) are two of the most frequent disorder of Calcium-Phosphorus (Ca-P) metabolism. The Ca/P ratio is an accurate tool to differentiate patients with PHPT from healthy subjects, according to a previous single-centre study. The reliability of this index is based on the fact that serum Ca and P are inversely related together either in healthy subjects or in patients with PHPT and HP.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The aim of this study is to investigate the accuracy and diagnostic value of Ca/P ratio in the diagnosis of primary hyperparathyroidism and hypoparathyroidism. The definition of a valid cut-off of serum Ca/P ratio for patients with these disorders will be of help especially in those patients with apparently normal biochemical profile, but suggestive for primary hyperparathyroidism and hypoparathyroidism.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1038

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Italy
      • Modena, Italy, 41124
        • Azienda Ospedaliero - Universitaria di Modena

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Serum Calcium to Phosphorus ratio will be compared among patients with different disorders of calcium-phosphorus metabolism (primary hyperparathyroidism and hypoparathyroidism) and controls.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with diagnosis of primary hyperparathyroidism
  • patients with diagnosis of hypoparathyroidism
  • subjects with normal Calcium-Phosphorus metabolism

Exclusion Criteria for both cases and controls will be:

  • age younger than 18 or older than 90 years
  • severe renal and liver diseases (i.e. glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <30 ml/min)
  • hyperparathyroidism secondary to Vitamin D deficiency
  • active metabolic bone disease (e.g. Paget's disease of the bone, osteomalacia, rickets, etc)
  • any type of cancer
  • malnutrition
  • severe obesity (BMI > 40 kg/m2)
  • a history of gastrointestinal malabsorption
  • sarcoidosis
  • hypercortisolism
  • diabetes insipidus
  • hyperthyroidism
  • pseudohypoparathyroidism
  • familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia (FHH)
  • treatment with steroids, active forms of vitamin D (calcitriol, ergocalciferol, etc), thiazides, phosphate binders, lithium, cinacalcet, bisphosphonates, and denosumab.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Patients with hyperparathyroidism
Patients aged between 18-90 years old with primary hyperparathyroidism. No intervention is provided.
Other: No intervention is provided
No intervention is provided
Patients with hypoparathyroidism

Patients aged between 18-90 years old with diagnosed hypoparathyroidism. No intervention is provided.

.
Other: No intervention is provided
No intervention is provided
Control group

Patients that underwent biochemical examination by primary care physician or by endocrinologist in order to assess their calcium-phosphorus metabolism state with normal results.

No intervention is provided.
Other: No intervention is provided
No intervention is provided

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Serum Calcium to Phosphorus ratio
Time Frame: Assessed only once at the diagnosis (from January 2005 to January 2018)
Calculated formula (serum calcium to serum phosphorus ratio)
Assessed only once at the diagnosis (from January 2005 to January 2018)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Serum Calcium
Time Frame: Assessed only once at the diagnosis (from January 2005 to January 2018)
From blood sample - Unit of measurement: mg/dl
Assessed only once at the diagnosis (from January 2005 to January 2018)
Serum Phosphorus
Time Frame: Assessed only once at the diagnosis (from January 2005 to January 2018)
From blood sample - Unit of measurement: mg/dl
Assessed only once at the diagnosis (from January 2005 to January 2018)
Serum Parathormone
Time Frame: Assessed only once at the diagnosis (from January 2005 to January 2018)
From blood sample - Unit of measurement: pg/ml
Assessed only once at the diagnosis (from January 2005 to January 2018)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 28, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 16, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 19, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 20, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 9, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 8, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 352/17

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings