Comparison of Quadratus Lumborum Block and Epidural Analgesia Following Kidney Transplant Surgery

October 26, 2020 updated by: Dita Aditianingsih, Indonesia University

Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Quadratus Lumborum Block and Epidural Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Management After Renal Transplantation

Quadratus lumborum block as an alternative for postoperative analgesia compared with epidural block

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Epidural analgesia is the main choice of analgesia following kidney transplant surgery. However, continuous epidural technique had some concerning side effects such as hemodynamic instabilities, urine retention, motor/sensory disturbances/weakness, and mobilisation comfort, it could also cause hypotension which could affect graft success. Quadratus lumborum (QL) block had lesser side effects thus could be an option for postoperative analgesia, however there are no study showing the safety and success rate of QL block techniques for patients who underwent kidney transplant surgery.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Indonesia
    • DKI Jakarta
      • Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia, 10430
        • Rumah Sakit Cipto Mangunkusumo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing elective kidney transplant laparotomy surgery
  • Agrees to participate in research
  • BMI < 30 kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Declines to participate in research
  • Contraindications to intervention procedures (epidural or quadratus lumborum block)
  • History of local anaesthetic allergy
  • Systemic allergic reactions, anaphylactic reaction, cardiac arrest
  • Failure of intervention procedures (epidural or quadratus lumborum block)
  • Intraoperative complications (massive bleeding, hypotension)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Continuous Epidural Analgesia
Continuous epidural analgesia using ropivacaine 0.375% 3 mL boluses followed by ropivacaine 0.2% with rate 6 mL per hour for 24 hours
Procedure: Continuous Epidural analgesia
Continuous Epidural catheter is inserted at the Thoracic 11-T12 level, using Ropivacaine 0.375% 3 mL bolus followed by Ropivacaine 0.2% with rate 6 mL/hour for 24 hours after laparoscopic nephrectomy
Experimental: Bilateral Quadratus Lumborum Block
Bilateral Quadratus lumborum block using ropivacaine 0.2% 20 mL each injection after surgery
Procedure: Bilateral Quadratus Lumborum block
Bilateral anterior Quadratus Lumborum block using Ropivacaine 0.375% 20 mL each injection as postoperative analgesia treatment for 24 hours

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Morphine consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours
Additional analgesia required at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery
24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Intensity
Time Frame: 24 hours
Pain intensity measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery. VAS assessed with horizontal line 0-100 mm for no pain to the worst pain, with range 0-30 mm for none to mild pain, 31-70 mm for moderate pain, 71-100 mm for severe pain.
24 hours
First time morphine required
Time Frame: 24 hours
Total time gap from postoperative analgesia procedure administration to first morphine requirement
24 hours
Total minimum and maximum dose of vasoactive agents
Time Frame: 24 hours
Minimum and maximum dose of norepinephrine and dobutamine as vasoactive agents within 24 hours after surgery
24 hours
Urine output
Time Frame: 24 hours
Urine output (mL/kgBW/hour) after surgery
24 hours
Bromage score
Time Frame: 24 hours

Bromage score at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery to assess lower limb motoric block.

Score for Bromage:

  1. free movement
  2. partial block
  3. almost complete
  4. complete block
24 hours
Ramsay score
Time Frame: 24 hours
Ramsay score at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery to assess patient sedation level.
24 hours
Dermatomal coverage of analgesia procedure
Time Frame: Immediately after anaesthesia completion
dermatome sensory block distribution using cold sensation test
Immediately after anaesthesia completion
Blood ropivacaine level
Time Frame: 24 hours
Arterial blood sample of all subjects will be withdrawn approximately 3 mL from the arterial line at 0, 30, 45, 60 minute, and 2, 4, 6,12,18, 24 hours after designated analgesia procedure, and will be used for ropivacaine blood level measurements using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC), to measure Total plasma ropivacaine concentration (Cstop), maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), time of maximum plasma concentration, area under the curve (AUC)
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Indonesia University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Dita Aditianingsih, M.D., Indonesia University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 10, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 6, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 7, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 11, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 28, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 26, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IndonesiaUAnes030

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings